562

This website made me reconsider if 99.9999% SLA and always online is really that important for lots of websites. I used to self-host my own server in my own apartment, but gave up on that after my internet provider had their first major outage that lasted almost a week. Also I didn't want to worry about the fire hazard, or the server going down when I was traveling etc.

But a solar powered server seems interesting, if the batteries could be made fire safe.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago

I have never been a fan of anything above 3 nines of uptime even in a business situation.

Your business will not collapse because of 10 min of downtime a week, and if it does that is not technologies fault.

I don't even bother to track my home setup.

[-] djdarren@piefed.social 95 points 1 week ago

My home server is 100% up, because I never check it and that's how it works, right?

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago

I didn't turn it down, so it's obviously up.

[-] Koenig2005@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago

Schrödingers home server

[-] hanke@feddit.nu 12 points 1 week ago

My home server is 100% up, because I run the checks from the same machine

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 24 points 1 week ago

Your business will not collapse because of 10 min of downtime a week, and if it does that is not technologies fault.

Hospitals? Air traffic control? Power grid operators? Like these are exceptional businesses, but they're out there.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

I agree, but the number of business that have actual need for extreme uptime is insignificant compared to the number of businesses that don't but think for some stupid reason they do.

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 15 points 1 week ago

Many airports are closed at night.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My brother is an air traffic controller at one of the world's busiest international airports and I can assure your their system uptime is no where close to 3 9s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app 9 points 1 week ago

I found the GitHub employee! 😉

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ice@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

There are plentiful scenarios where 10 minutes of sequential downtime would be a critical issue. Say you're a telecoms or internet provider - even a one minute delay to a life-saving message can be enough for someone to die.

Furthermore, lots of things are interconnected now. Your business might be able to handle 10 minutes of downtime, but lets say my business relies on 12 different service providers like you, who each have 10 minutes of downtime during a week using your rationale. That could up being 2hrs of downtime each week.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

I don't even bother to track my home setup

I host home assistant and if anything goes down I'll notice pretty fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ATPA9@feddit.org 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The uptime looks better than GitHubs...

[-] Gekkonen@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 week ago

I know this is a typo, but I'm sad Guthub isn't a food delivery company.

[-] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 34 points 1 week ago

gut pull sandwich.com

gut commit -m "ate too much"
gut push

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

Companies claiming 99.9999 uptime is an absurd goal for a SLA, and wouldn’t even survive a small internet outage like a DDoS attack or Akamai outage. I remember in the 90s selling the idea of 5 9’s - 99.999% on my resume until some manager who Interviewed me asked me to state the expected downtime. I stopped claiming that number because it’s impossible without full active redundancy in different locations and not dependent on external providers like cloudflare ever going down.

And please don’t argue maintenance windows “cover it” because that’s not how they work in the real world today.

Downtime per year:

  • 99% ~3.65 days (5,256 min)
  • 99.9% ~8.77 hours (526 min)
  • 99.99% ~52.6 min
  • 99.999% ~5.26 min
  • 99.9999% ~31.5 seconds

For my home lab I’m happy my stuff is online and content I hardly lose access when there’s a power outage thanks to my ups. But if I tracked I’d be closer to 95%. Good enough but I can’t wait till I just don’t care to run anything.

[-] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I worked for a "99.999%" up time facility. No one talks about the exceptions that don't effect that number. Some are out of our hands like weather or a knob w/ a backhoe.

Others are just made up by upper management to hit the numbers for their bonuses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 week ago

100% uptime since the last time we turned it on!

[-] weps@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

works every time half of the time!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flandish@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

doesn’t every website go down when there is no power? ;)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's a nifty project on Mastodon where someone is running an instance entirely on solar (and I think a battery?). They've been tinkering with some of the code to do things like optimise images for reduced weight or CPU cost.

The project is called @solaradmin@solarcene.community and the account for the person running it is on a separate instance, presumably so people can message them about problems: @smallsolar@techhub.social.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

1000004480

congrats guys! we killed it!

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago

I used to work on the website for a utility company that insisted on ridiculous uptime. Our major deployments risked taking the system down for a few seconds, though in practice that never happened.

As a result, they made us do deployments starting at 3:00 in the morning since that was the least active time on the site. Fuuuuuuuuck that place.

[-] eyekaytee@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This was cool 5 years ago, now you can get solar panels and a home battery big enough to power this thing 24x7 without an issue, even if the sun was fully blacked out for a week

edit: a 40kwh battery would last with the power draw:

Power usage 2.62W

like over a year

[-] Gekkonen@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 week ago

There's a lot of articles about supply based usage vs demand based energy production on that website. The idea that it turns off every now and then is sort of part of the authors' intention of showing "we can live with some outages".

This article in particular is a good one: https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2017/09/how-not-to-run-a-modern-society-on-solar-and-wind-power-alone/

[-] son_of_darkness@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I think you entirelly missed the point then

[-] morto@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Now they can get better hardware, but should they? They take seriously the low tech part, and part of being low tech is fighting against consumerism culture and keeping with what they have, which is wotking fine

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

garage is a software project made for communal home hosting. Tech literates will talk about its S3 API but that's the least interesting part: the most interesting is that it has been purposely built to be hosted on (actual) commodity hardware like second-hand nucs, running on flaky home power and internet and linked together through usual isps. Nodes may come up and down but the cluster withstands all of that.

Garage would be a pretty nice project to run a solar-powered mini-cluster. If sufficiently far from each other, you could even run without polluting batteries !

https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Over a period of roughly one year (351 days, from 12 December 2018 to 28 November 2019) the server was up for 95.26% of the time. This means that we were offline for 399 hours (which corresponds to 16.64 days).

Not bad at all really, at least for non-mission critical sites. I have solar and I really like it. Solar power on two barns, and a lot of my security cams run on solar. I'm not sure if it's the formatting of this site, or the grainy pictures, but it oddly reminds me of the Trojan Room coffee pot.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 13 points 1 week ago

Lead-acid batteries work if you don't care about weight and lithium-iron phosphate if you do

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago

You're better off with the LiFePO4 batteries even if you don't care about weight. A lead acid battery will wear out quickly when you cycle it daily. Lithium also has a higher charging efficiency, so you get more usable power from the solar panel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

"Hey look everyone! We never heard of grid scale batteries!"

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] markstos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I host my personal site at home with a 15-min battery backup. After that, I accept the downtime. Rarely happens and I haven’t had a single complaint when it does.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 10 points 1 week ago

It's honestly impressive what you can do with under 3W of power these days

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bismyth@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

This is actually great!
Social media sites should do this. There's never a good reason to be on [Insert Corporate Slop Social Media Website here] at 3AM.

[-] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago

Never a good reason, like different timezones, different working/sleeping hours. Theres no better or worse hour for every single person.

[-] Chaf@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

It's not like those major social media sites don't have some kind of data center (or rent one) in every "major" (population wise) timezone they operate in. Your other arguments still hold true, but I think even then it would be better for all of us if those websites went down every now and then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Appreciate the website itself, with it's dithered low-colour PNG illustrations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Use a gell cell lead acid battery (the kind that go in regular UPSs). No fire hazzard, ans bonus, they can survive freezing temperatures just fine if outdoors. Downside is replacing a cheap battery every 3 years.

[-] cloudshouter@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Having everything open, on and available 24/7/365 sounds nice until you realize the human toll for things which aren’t that necessary and can be planned around. Down time is a good thing.

[-] Kirk@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago

I love Low Tech magazine! I have been reading them for years.

[-] mapleseedfall@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

i love this website. The articles they wrote is always interesting

[-] lemuria@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

The 1% of the time it's down, there's always the Internet Archive or reading your own downloaded copy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nyvios@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Current uptime of over 23 weeks, not bad

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] phil@openmic.social 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Interesting concept. I haven't seen lowtechmagazine before, going to have to definitely check it out.

I spin down our development environments when they have sit idle for a period of time, not at all the same but makes me think deeper about the entire concept.

Update: This is a really cool website. I see some fun projects here too that I could have my kids work on!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] remon@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

All websites go offline when there is no power ...

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

This actually cool.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
562 points (99.1% liked)

Selfhosted

61770 readers
473 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS