I’ll be the first to throw my country under the bus instead of trying to defend it if it does bad stuff just because I was born there.

I think you're confused. That's the position I'm arguing for. I already said that my home state is a reactionary cesspool, in the same way that Israel is. Because the country is so shit, I believe we should denounce it and throw it under the bus by correctly labelling it with the term "Zionist." You are arguing against that position, and, rather than throwing the country under the bus, are throwing a race under the bus.

As I’ve explained plenty below it’s also dangerous to keep denying the very strong links between Judaism and Zionism because Zionists are able to use their Jewish institutions like Synagogues to sell stolen Palestinian land and then get defended by “anti-Zionists” who will tell you there is no link between Judaism and Zionism.

A chud will see some evil corporation doing pinkwashing and conclude from that they need to hate queer people, this is the same mentality. Zionists use Judaism as a cover, and sometimes they are able to get away with it, and in cases where there's ambiguity it may be unwise to force the issue from the perspective of optics.

But by equating them, you're just playing straight into their rhetoric and giving them exactly what they want. Again, for no reason other than wanting to sound edgy.

Furthermore anti-Zionist Jews have directly massively damaged the Palestine movement by going on witch-hunts against prominent voices such as Jeremy Corbyn

When did "anti-Zionist Jews" go on a witch-hunt against Corbyn? Because I distinctly remember Zionists, Jewish and otherwise, conducting said witch-hunt. Corbyn was quite clear on distinguishing his criticism for the Israeli state from Jews in general, so the people who had a problem with that were Zionists almost by definition.

Placing their attempt to save the Jewish reputation

Who on earth said anything about "saving the Jewish reputation?" What I'm concerned about is subverting and coopting a movement by taking it completely off-message from the very clearly correct position of "The state of Israel is bad because it's doing genocide" into this racial bullshit for, again, no fucking reason except that being in the position of the good guy apparently makes you uncomfortable somehow. And I'm just saying, tough shit, get it together.

It's so dumb from every perspective. First off it's just factually inaccurate, but it's also just horrendous optics, it goes against any ideology we'd want to build a movement around, it legitimizes the rhetoric of both fascists and Zionists, and again, it's a completely unforced error on your part that serves no actual purpose.

Hmm. My impression on Oct 7 was that there was some schadenfreude going on. Which isn't excuse for anything. More of a sign that diplomacy should be pursued whenever possible.

I dunno, I recall the interview with Joe Sacco, who was way more outspoken in criticizing Israel. Then no positioning through media. Maybe I'm being unfair and he just doesn't get the spotlight when his stance is more critical.

At the surface level, that's just fallacious. Feminism is used as a stick to hit Muslims. Your reasoning structure (as explained by you from further down the thread) dictates "taking that weapon away" because of western imperialist crimes in Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. There is no logic in this. Just because someone disingenuously turns something into a stick does not mean that the thing was a stick to begin with. If I start using PC keyboards as paddleboards, that doesn't mean that PC keyboards are paddleboards.

At the deeper level, it's worse. It's buying into the dishonest weaponization of antisemitism that zionists perform. That's just accepting the basic structure of zionism as unavoidable. Same as with the feminist example, a program of "taking away the feminism weapon" just buys into the structure of Huntingtonian war of civilizations, and reinforces it as its dialectical counter-tension. Conflating Jews with Israel is Zionism at its most basic "zionishness". How can you even begin to imagine building any kind of antizionism on zionism itself? It's just as silly as trying to base antiracist politics on racist stereotypes about black people being more physical than intelligent: "proper antiracist praxis is to deemphasize intellectualism because black people aren't intellectual" and "proper antizionist praxis is to deemphasize antisemitism because the majority of Jews are supporting zionism"; this is just madness and folly.

Your arguments are deeply deeply misguided. But the proof is in the pudding. Like I asked elsewhere in the thread: what is the ask here, what are the specific kinds of tasks you are envisioning antizionists to undertake?

This is true. But is there any advantage to criticising all Jews, compared to criticising Zionism?

My country was once part of the British Empire. Was the problem the existence of British people, or the ideology of colonial supremacy? We still have the grandchildren of British officers around, and they're people, just like everyone else. What matters is creating a democratic system, with equality for all people. Then even those who have racist views will be forced to live alongside others.

why not?

As an antizionist Jew who grew up in the Midwest

I presume you mean the united states midwest. Can I ask you some questions? Ill put behind spoiler.