823

Some 92 percent have delayed or abandoned medical care because of costs, according to a survey of 1,507 U.S.adults by financial services firm JG Wentworth.

High prices at the doctor’s office, urgent care, emergency room and more have led to 85 percent of Americans having medical debt. Collectively, American consumers have $220 billion in medical debt, according to a February poll from KFF - that’s around $958.61 per adult with medical debt.

Nearly one in five adults said their health got worse because they skipped a doctor’s visit. That problem is more acute for those 64 and younger - 42 percent say their health got worse after putting off a medical visit.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Sylaran@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I only go to the doctor once a year, and only because they hold my prescriptions hostage until I comply.

Its 250 dollars for 15 minutes of asking how I was doing and if I had any issues, before sending in my refills.

I have an ongoing issue thats causing me physical disability and probable permanent damage, my doctor told me to go to a specialist.

I called 10 specialists, 9 refused to accept an uninsured/self pay patient. the other one was willing to see an uninsured/self pay patient.. but only if I paid a 800 new patient fee, in addition to the regular office visit cost.

This is why I dont go to the doctor.

[-] laranis@lemmy.zip 17 points 22 hours ago

"Shocking"

Fuck you. Literally everyone in the US absolutely makes this decision for themselves and their families regularly. It isn't "shocking". It is the reality we're all dealing with.

What would be shocking is if anyone in charge gave a fuck about the people instead of their donors and moved to do something about it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago
[-] hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I didn't expect it to be this high, because I remember the debates around Obamacare. People would say "but I like my insurance", and I don't know if there has been a massive change since then, or if people are holding these contradictory ideas in their heads.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

There is definitely a section that can't afford to use their insurance and also is terrified they will lose it.

[-] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I went to urgent care, waited for 20 - 30 minutes, they called back to the back room, spent 10 minutes in the back before they said they couldn’t help me. Go to a specialist. $275 bill

[-] BrickEater@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago
[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Insurers love people who pay their work plan's monthly premium without ever visiting a doctor. It's free money!

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago

Its why the invented copay!

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Its too expensive and most of the time you don't get any help.

The last few times I have gone to a doctor, its basically been shrugged shoulders and a bunch of surprise bills for the next few months.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stopforgettingit@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

I had cancer 3 years ago. I will be paying off my treatment costs for the next 10 years, like I will be fully in remission for over 5 years from cancer and still paying off my treatment. So maybe that is why.

[-] jambudz@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

Guys, did you know if you put water on something, it becomes wet?

[-] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Among those 92% there have to be people who vote Republican. Is it really more important for them "to own the libs" than having affordable/universal healthcare?

[-] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

I just (last year) got a fantastic new job with great pay and benefits. Which means I am only responsible for the first 5000. It's been 12 years since I have seen a doctor. I'm in one of the worst health care states in the union. Just lucky so far. This is the state of healthcare in the usa.

[-] tmyakal@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago

I've had "good" insurance for almost a decade now, but I could never find a doctor that was in-network, taking new patients, and less than 50 miles away. I was calling around locally every three months, like clockwork, for years.

I finally got lucky this week, so I've got an appointment in October. The receptionist asked me when my last physical was, and I said 2004. She said, "Oh, so not in the last year then?"

[-] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Yep, the insurance companies want us dead. They are trying to thin our those who are "weak" when it was thier fault that we are physically weak in the first place. They just want to kill people as far as I can tell. Helping is secondary.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

The “92% of Americans aren’t going to the doctor because it’s too expensive” claim is misleading.

The 92% figure comes from a survey of just 1,507 U.S. adults conducted for financial-services company JG Wentworth. It reportedly found that 92% had delayed or abandoned some form of medical care because of cost. That is very different from saying that 92% of Americans don't go to the doctor, or that only 8% of Americans “attend to their health.”

There is much better independent data showing that cost really is a major problem, but the numbers are nowhere near 92%. KFF's 2025 national polling found that 36% of adults said they had skipped or postponed needed health care during the previous year because of cost. KFF also found that 37% of insured adults reported doing so, so having insurance clearly doesn't eliminate the problem.

Even better, an analysis using National Health Interview Survey data, rather than a private company's survey, found that about 17% of U.S. adults delayed or did not get health care because of cost in 2024.

So the underlying story is absolutely legitimate: healthcare costs are causing millions of Americans to delay or forgo care. But presenting a JG Wentworth survey's 92% figure as though it means “only 8% of Americans seek medical care” is a pretty substantial distortion of what the survey actually measured.

The more defensible takeaway is: American healthcare is expensive enough that a significant minority of Americans are delaying needed care because they cannot afford it. That's bad enough without turning the statistic into something it doesn't actually say.

[-] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

92% of the time I should go to the doctor I don't because I can't afford to.

The other 8% I'm unconscious or need to be literally put back together beyond what super glue and electrical tape can handle.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

So you're basically a 40k dreadnought. 😂

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 3 points 22 hours ago

Every report like this uses a small sample size to represent the entire population. Do you think they're surveying 400 million people?

The question is, how did they get these 1500 people, and can it be repeated? If so, then the data is valid.

But basically, a lot hangs on how random their sample size was. Did they stick to one area? Did they stick to one age group, sex, etc. All in all, if the sample group is random, 1500 people is a valid measure for this data.

After this, there needs to be peer review. Other institutions need to be able to repeat the results with their own random groups.

But, 1500 is a great sample size. Just need to make sure it's random and repeatable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, like I could afford a regular visit but I worked in healthcare and I've seen the bills people get hit with because things are coded wrong or denied by their insurance or whatever. I'm not rolling the dice on that unless something's really wrong with me.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

I mean I'm working at a fortune 500 company and with my stupid high deductible plan even I don't want to go unless it's something that pretty urgent. I mean I already pay 10K+ a year for my family and then it's another 10K to meet the deductible and every doctor's appointment that's not the annual checkup is two to three hundred dollars and urgent care is even more expensive so yeah, it's basically unless there's something absolutely wrong, it's avoid the doctor and only go when things are basically unbearable even knowing I could afford to go.

US heathcare is a joke and unpopular opinion but the ACA, aka, Federal Romneycare, needs to be ripped out and actual universal healthcare needs to be enacted.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 23 hours ago

America complains about Canadians paying more taxes but I guarantee you I have never paid $10k a year in taxes that would just go towards our free healthcare.

[-] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Universal healthcare will happen in the USA once my fellow Americans figure out that paying $8K a year in premiums is more than $2K a year in taxes. So. It could take awhile.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just read the stories about how things were in Britain when the National Health Service was created.

One of the things which was pretty common before the NHS was created was this kind of thing - most people would only ever go to the doctor when they were already very sick for a while and their health just kept getting worse.

After the National Health Service was created overall healthcare costs actually went down because people were actually going to the doctor much earlier and less sick, plus under Universal Healthcare "Preventive Medicine" makes sense even just from an economic point of view because it reduces the costs of the whole system.

[-] Alexfire@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

This is true, better health and lower costs, but all the proof in the world won't change the maga team to support it. Some of them have what they think is "good insurance" and think they're special and don't want it for all. Lots of selfishness rather than raise all boats, it's part of the cowboy lore they like to pretend they are lol.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago

The core value of both MAGA politicians and MAGA supporters is "what's in it for me", not what's better for people in general.

In fact, the same applies to most Democrat politicians and possibly even most Democrat supporters.

Selfish Individualism is kinda the thing which is extra extra in the US compared to, say, Europe were there either a large minority or maybe even a majority still hold at least some pro-social principles

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Who could have seen this happening?

[-] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

financial services firm JG Wentworth.

I never considered that company a "financial services firm" - financial rip off firm is more like it.

Sad thing is, I can easily see this being true.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 19 hours ago

well yeah 64 and younger because you can get medicare at 65. of course that actually only pays 80%.

[-] spacegoat@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Yeah but we can’t change it because republicans love dying

[-] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago

They love other people dying. They're just willing to guarantee their own death to make that a reality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not shocking when you have no universal health care and even if you do have insurance it doesn't cover crap. I just paid $200 for labs because "insurance" only covered half the cost. The entire system is a racket.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

Doesn't sound all that shocking in a system that would rather you just die cheaply somewhere.

[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 150 points 1 day ago

This is by design. The government wants this for us.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 day ago

The shocking thing is the propaganda in the headline saying this is "shocking".

Where is the call for violent overthrow of the regime?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kukukese@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Well, Trump says if Republicans win Midterms, he has $5000 to give every American Adult.

[-] acchariya@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

The problem is my doctor doesn't accept trump coins

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
823 points (98.9% liked)

News

39162 readers
2280 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS