The US military won't eat* my* face.
That sergeant is a trans-master?
the only right type of "American" are the indigenous
I have trans friends and have met a number of trans people through them and I would trust all of them over any MAGAt traitor, any day.
MAGAts hate America. They couldn't make that any more clear than they already have.
If they can do the job, then wth is the problem?
Hate, racism, misogeny and especially the wish to make others suffer more than they do, no matter the cost to themselves or to the nation or whatever. In the core it's self hate, although they will deny it, and say you hate yourself if you confront them.
Fuck US soldiers. The pain that military has exported is known to all. Nope, being trans won’t get a pass from me. Anyone who has joined that military in the last 70 or so years should have known what they were signing up for. Any neo-imperial prospective soldier from Russia to the US to wherever should know.
At least US soldiers got a fucking choice. Brown children with PTSD from the sound of drones never had a choice. Thousands upon thousands of corpses. THAT is the primary legacy of the US military.
All you empire-apologist USians can downvote me and eat my shit, but please leave some for the beloved troops.

This scene raises my heart rate so bad. It's wild knowing that you could show this to some people and have them decide that they want to be in his place.
There's always a chunk of people who want to be the boot. And a chunk of people who are happy to eat boots if they can be the boot sometimes.
She's not a cis white male so people like Hegseth don't want her in the military in the first place. Not sure why a trans person would want to serve in an organization that actively hates them. This is a classic example of leopards eating faces.
I think people haven't read your three sentences, because I think everyone would agree at the start, but most disagree by the end. She's been in for 20 years. That's where you get your pension. She joined and served through bush Obama trump Biden and now trump again. This isn't a leopards eating face thing, considering 20 years ago I'm not sure she was aware she'd be a she yet.
A lot of us join pre realization. It's a way to "man up" both for trans women trying desperately to become enough of a man like they were "supposed to be" and a masculine career that conservative parents approve of for closeted trans men. Then, especially if you're an officer, once you're in and used to it it's a career with great benefits including a full pension after 20 years and the alternative is often a full career change.
Oh also enlisting is a popular "career of last resort" for people struggling to function in society without any known disqualifying disabilities. Incidentally, a lot of trans people's pre realization dysphoria leads to having no idea why you can't just get your shit together and develop discipline. And since the military promises it'll give you discipline it can be attractive, especially when combined with the prior paragraph.
Yeah this was me. I didn't really have any concept of self aside from what my dad was doing and that's what he did. So that's what I was going to do. It paid really well but once I realized that the gig was up I had to leave or else get caught into the political quagmire going on now.
Want to tell that the the African Americans who also went into the military despite being openly hated?
This isn't about leopards eating faces, this is about a brave person fighting for basic human rights, human dignity, and making progress against bullshit bigotry conservatives yet again.
Yes! Why would that be any different?
This is indeed about fighting for basic human rights, human dignity, and making progress against bullshit bigotry.
I think TriCare used to cover surgery.
It did, and even before then there were ways to get the VA to do it, especially for trans men's top surgery.
Fuck anyone who shits on someone who served their country for 20 years. I'm not simping for the military, but public service is still something to be respected IMO.
She served in Epstein's army.
Lol I don't disagree but it's funny to see the votes on Lemmy. Just yesterday someone was getting upvoted for generalising all SAS veterans because of 1 they met + 2 which made the news. But now we're talking about a trans woman so suddenly people agree we need to respect people who served
Winning over the common soldier is an effective an important strategy in war.
Because, as reality would show, the moment people stop giving two craps about you is when you wake up with a primed grenade in your bunk and a pre-written report of your 'valiant death in the line of duty.'
Or if we're going old school, 27 stab wounds from the enemy, despite being kilometers away from the front.
Fucking sad.
I'm happy that in my country of citizenship trans people are excluded from the army. I don't wanna get drafted or something.
Are women excluded from your country's military?
To be fair, the entire western world has been told to be the wrong kind of ally by US. So it's at least consistent.
Well, to my understanding, Hegseth wants extra-Teed up dudes, yes? And she is not an extra-Teed up dude. This is actually gender-affirming.
Bet they'd take a trans dude who's already on T and give him even more.
I've heard some analysis of anti trans types that indicated they're much more upset about men to women transitioners than the reverse because it's an open rejection of the more "powerful" role and how dare you reject your privilege like that.
Can't speak to the veracity of that but it makes sense to me.
yea, rowling was pretty hateful towards MTF, she is silent FTM types. its probably msygoyny in play though. come to think of it, we rarely hear hate/critcism towards FTM, so i think its also pure misogyny.
Maybe she can flourish into a more helpful person now.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.