[-] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 51 minutes ago

People are pretty stupid and uncritically believe the myths about the republican party. Guy I worked with said "the republicans will unlock the economy" so he voted for trump. And then tariffs borked his business, and the war in iran probably killed some of his family. But he still jokes, as an iranian immigrant, about ICE abductions. Some people are just stupid.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 53 minutes ago

That's the heart of conservatism: hierarchy

There are many who would happily lobby to refuse all emergency services, rights, legal protections, healthcare, etc to those who are “undeserving”.

I go on about this a lot, but the book "Dying of Whiteness" has examples of that. One guy literally was dying but still didn't want those people to have free health care, even if it would save his life.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 55 minutes ago

I think part of the problem is that Bethesda doesn't really seem to have a good critical understanding. They like the superficial stuff, like children. Like this meme, I guess.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 57 minutes ago

If you haven't read Eco's essay on ur-fascism, it's a good read: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/umberto-eco-ur-fascism

So we come to my second point. There was only one Nazism. We cannot label Franco’s hyper-Catholic Falangism as Nazism, since Nazism is fundamentally pagan, polytheistic, and anti-Christian. But the fascist game can be played in many forms, and the name of the game does not change. The notion of fascism is not unlike Wittgenstein’s notion of a game. A game can be either competitive or not, it can require some special skill or none, it can or cannot involve money. Games are different activities that display only some “family resemblance,” as Wittgenstein put it. Consider the following sequence:

1___2___3___4

abc bcd cde def

Suppose there is a series of political groups in which group one is characterized by the features abc, group two by the features bcd, and so on. Group two is similar to group one since they have two features in common; for the same reasons three is similar to two and four is similar to three. Notice that three is also similar to one (they have in common the feature c). The most curious case is presented by four, obviously similar to three and two, but with no feature in common with one. However, owing to the uninterrupted series of decreasing similarities between one and four, there remains, by a sort of illusory transitivity, a family resemblance between four and one.

Fascism became an all-purpose term because one can eliminate from a fascist regime one or more features, and it will still be recognizable as fascist. Take away imperialism from fascism and you still have Franco and Salazar. Take away colonialism and you still have the Balkan fascism of the Ustashes. Add to the Italian fascism a radical anti-capitalism (which never much fascinated Mussolini) and you have Ezra Pound. Add a cult of Celtic mythology and the Grail mysticism (completely alien to official fascism) and you have one of the most respected fascist gurus, Julius Evola.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 3 points 1 hour ago

Musk is a sack of shit that doesn't deserve nice things. I hope he, as the saying goes, dies mad about this.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 7 points 1 hour ago

This was Hinge, which is owned by Match Group (who own okcupid and many others). It's the least bad, I found, but that is extremely faint praise.

I used to use OKCupid way back. It used to be better. I'm pretty sure you could search. Like you could just type in "Star Trek" or "Dark Souls" and find people who had that on their profile. Nowadays you just take what the algorithm gives you.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 15 points 2 hours ago

mind you, I cut off my guy best friend irl and a long term gaming buddy I had for him, out of respect.

What the fuck. Why would you do that? Go apologize to your former friend.

Other than that, this guy sucks. You can find better.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 20 points 2 hours ago

Glad I finally am in a position where I'm not on the apps (knock on wood, etc). I was getting dates but I could always tell it was in spite of their best efforts.

And even the person I'm with now, I feel like the app algorithm thought we'd be like an 80%. On paper it doesn't seem like it'd be a long term fit- i have a cat, she has a dog. I like a lot of metal, she likes jam bands. Lot of room for the algorithm to predict we'd have a few dates and then it wouldn't work out.

And as someone else said, most of them are owned by Match group. Even the myths of capitalism require competition for products to be good. Match should be broken up.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 14 hours ago

Fortunately someone already did a lot of the work for you. That’s one of the mods I consider mandatory for every playthrough and lets you freely tweak a tons of rules.

Oh yeah, the last time I replayed the games I used that. I had some sort of dwarf berserker that was pretty strong, until the end game where being angry wasn't enough.

Wonder if getting it to work on linux is trivial.. Someone did a writeup at least: https://moebiusproject.gitlab.io/mods_on_linux

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 16 hours ago

Loved the game as a child. Really struggle with the rule system now.

The combat is kind of shallow. There's a lot of tedious kiting, or just rolling the dice and waiting.

The sense of wonder was pretty top notch though.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 10 points 18 hours ago

A top priority for me is the people who do stuff benefit from that stuff, instead of some removed jerks.

Along side health care, food, shelter, an environment that's sustainable for human life.

I'm not familiar with anarchism's solutions to these things.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 11 points 21 hours ago

Some of these streets are busy with double parked cars and a painted on bike lane. I still believe if someone's parked in the bike lane you should be able to do whatever you want to the car.

There's one spot I've been through a lot, on this list, where they want the bike to merge into the center lane in order to continue. Insane.

24

I'm a simple man. I do a lot of rice and beans with random spices for dinner, and oatmeal with peanut butter and sometimes fruit for lunch.

Sometimes I get fake-burgers, which are tasty and super easy in the air fryer, but aren't nearly as cheap.

There's lots of other stuff out there. What do you like that's the best intersection of fast, easy, cheap?

105

As the title says, how often do you admit you're wrong? Is it different when it's a factual dispute versus something more subjective?

I make an effort to concede early if I'm in error. I think because my mother almost never admits fault. She'll fall back to "that's not what I meant" or similar deflections first, and that's really annoying.

The last big factual error I made was about the distance of walking, and that's where I learned about Taxicab Geometry ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicab_geometry ).

I think some people believe admitting fault is a sign of weakness, but I find it's more of a power move. It takes strength to do it, and people can tell when you're sweating and desperate. Usually it leads to resolving the conflict faster and cheaper, too.

(I expect some people will feel the urge to reply they're never wrong. I'll file that under never admits fault.)

99
submitted 3 months ago by jtrek@startrek.website to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

This is the bad place.

It's fucking toilet paper. I don't need a summary.

Not only are they wasting time, energy, and screen space with this slop, it seems to have come with a bug preventing me from adding anything to my cart. I just get 403s when trying.

I can only assume management demanded engineering maximize their AI usage at the expense of boring things like testing and stability.

I hate this.

view more: next ›

jtrek

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 6 months ago