689
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 7 points 3 hours ago

I thought they were performative and unnecessary, their removal shows I was wrong.

These were the canary in the coal mine, as long as they stayed up it was safe for us.

In the future, I'll continue to see them as performative and unrepresentative of whether the institutions will actually support us. However, I will never again dismiss them as unnecessary.

[-] TaterTot@piefed.social 57 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This mindset always frustrates me.

Of course it was performative, all public art is performative. This is no different than tv promoting the "traditional american family", or statues "honoring the troops", or memorials, or any other art promoting propagandized values.

But life imitates art. Even if the intent was insincere pandering, it still has an effect on how people perceive their society. We should want our propaganda to reflect our values. We should want statues of MLK and Harvey Milk instead of Robert E Lee and Jefferson Davis. We should want rainbow streets and pride flags in public spaces. We should want their agenda to match our values. We should want the next generation growing up in a society that shows its support for marginalized people, instead of nationalism.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago

It took me a long time to get that, but I really feel it. Like, don't get me wrong, putting up a rainbow crosswalk doesn't mean much if the government that does it is v coding trans prisoners, but the statement "these people had to fight for their rights, and we're glad to call them our neighbors" is still important.

And hell stuff like this adds to the vibes in the same way having a bunch of Chinese aesthetic in Chinatown does. Yeah, you should make the gayborhood feel like it. And while you're at it hire black artists to help beautify the blacker parts of town. I actually used to live in a neighborhood with a ton of black art and it absolutely made it a nicer place to live, even as a white person.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 24 points 15 hours ago

Sometimes the point of a protest is to put yourself in a position to get knocked down.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Much of the civil rights movement was based on this premise, that when the police or regime paramilitaries come and engage in brutality, it makes sympathists of bystanders, activists of sympathists and militants of activists. This is COIN 101.

(In the case of counter insurgency, the model reminds the state not to let their police be brutal with the protesters, but putting down the resistance is through hearts and minds. But authoritarian states don't usually listen to counter-insurgency experts, and in fact, enjoy seeing their troopers stomp on heads.)

To be fair, another part of the Civil Rights strategy was then to take police departments to court, and get their municipalities to pay for damages. That way, it hurt the institution, and the administrators would feel it and turn to discipline the police department.

But now we're in an age of ubiquitous phone cameras and an internet where video can be directly streamed. And that amplifies the recruitment effect when police get brutal on video. In fact, I think this is why the various nations are trying to lock down the internet through age verification (de-anonymizing) and saturation with slop. Seeing people on the ground get hurt is visceral and develops support for social movements from across the world.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 44 points 18 hours ago

In my country people, especially teenage boys, try to avoid walking over the rainbow crossings. Since they don’t want to be seen as gay, because other boys will call them gay if they walk on the rainbow. My country is the Netherlands btw.

Yes they might be pandering but they also reveal how people in society still have ingrained bigoted views. You can only really tackle these shortcomings in society if they reveal themselves.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 10 points 14 hours ago

Damn that's surprising, I always thought the Dutch were some of the most tolerant people around. Y'all do have some crazy right wing politicians thought.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 16 hours ago

Daniella Mestyanek Young, aka Knitting Cult Lady observes authoritarian movemens hate color and seek to deface all public art and expression that doesn't specifically belong to or represent the movement.

I've always seen the Thin Blue Line flag as the diametric opposite of the Pride flag.

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 59 points 20 hours ago

For me the LGBTQ colours displayed by the city are meaningful. It feels safer gay kissing in a square painted with rainbows, sitting on pink benches. It made it easier to ease into my own self. It’s like a big sign saying "IT’S OK".

[-] tmyakal@infosec.pub 31 points 19 hours ago

My city put a rainbow-themed art installation in the most heavily trafficked park in the city back in 2019. It was supposed to be there for one year, as a temporary memorial to the 50th anniversary of the Stonewall riots. It's been there for 7 years now, and half the city would lose their minds if someone tried to take it down now.

[-] Malgas@beehaw.org 12 points 15 hours ago

It's neat how "temporary" installations can become part of the identity of a place. The Eiffel tower was also supposed to be temporary.

[-] Micromot@piefed.social 156 points 23 hours ago

They are just like rainbow capitalism. They don't improve the rights of anyone but they are an indicator of the acceptance.

[-] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 14 hours ago

Public symbols matter. If they didn't, the right wouldn't feel the need to target them. You dismiss public symbols of acceptance as if they're not vitally important. I imagine if the symbols that represent you, your background, and your beliefs were targeted, suddenly you wouldn't be dismissing them as irrelevant.

Public symbols and rights are not disconnected. There's a reason they advance or retreat in lockstep.

[-] Micromot@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

But they... Represent me. And I think they are important. But I know they wouldn't be displayed or used by governments or companies when the public opinion wasn't already mostly positive.

Symbols used by individuals or groups outside of government or companies are different because they serve as identification.

As an example, in germany we have a lot of pride symbols but the government still puts trans people that change their name on a list. Symbols used by companies/government react to change and don't cause it

[-] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 55 points 21 hours ago

Right? Easy to overstate the value of it as we see now, but it sure was nice being a demographic worth pandering to, especially when that meant that the homophobes weren't worth appeasing.

[-] Micromot@piefed.social 21 points 21 hours ago

It was a good feeling but always had the aftertaste of instantly disappearing when the political wind changes. We will sadly never truly be free under capitalism

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] AmyAye@nord.pub 27 points 20 hours ago

Exactly. People are all "TaRgEt jUsT waNtS yOuR mOnEy."

Well, yeah, but also it just shows an overall acceptance. It makes people more at ease in general. It lets non queer people also feel more open to showing support. It's about the overall mindset of society.

[-] SpikedIguana@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

But target literally played both sides

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, having it and taking it away is worse than never having it at all.

[-] Zagorath@quokk.au 79 points 22 hours ago

Both can be true. The installation can be a bit naff, but the choice to remove it is an act of deliberate hatred.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Did they actually pour colored concrete and not just paint? Awesome if so, makes them work for their performative hatred at least when removing.

Closeted cowards.

Being phobes does not mean they're closeted. It just means that the ones who are closeted are uncomfortably repressed, while the rest are sexually frustrated in other ways

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah, Brennan isn't closeted, he just looks at grindr every day to find cool tattoo ideas.

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago

pandering was always pandering,

But pandering is a great canary

[-] rarbg@lemmy.zip 8 points 15 hours ago

Is this a state roadway? If not, crazy that the state has the authority to do this.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

TXDoT is responsible for a LOT of roads within cities - especially those with heavier traffic.

The (much smaller) city I work for only has like 2 intersections with enough traffic to require a signal that don't involve a TXDoT road.

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

This is how I find out that my city has/had a pridewalk?!

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago

They did this to Houston, but they did an extremely half-assed job. It was one thin layer of additional asphalt covering over the whole intersection. But you can still see the pride crosswalk peeking out from underneath at the edges.

I'm still very upset.

Especially now that the sidewalks have been defaced with hate messages, which were then blacked out with spray paint. Is there a way to get the spray paint off the concrete and go back to chalk?

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They have us fighting over crosswalks while our house burns down.

E: that’s not cool my comment was pulled for “minimizing queer struggles”. I don’t know how anyone got that out of what I said. I specifically want to make the point that there’s a shitload of bad stuff happening, that bad stuff includes LGBTQ people as victims, but the fact that news coversge goes to arguing over crosswalks instead of the dumpsterfire hppening is ridiculous. We’re in this shitshow together. A crosswalk removed is the symptom, not the actual problem.

[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 18 hours ago

As if the queer people they've marginalized in the work force even have houses. As if more kids won't be bullied because it's official government policy to hate gays. As if a generation of queer people will struggle to discover themselves, never seeing themselves represented because we are forced to hide ourselves from view.

It's not about the crosswalk, it's just one particular facet of fascist oppression. It isn't a distraction and it doesn't invalidate any of the other harm they caused.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 23 points 22 hours ago

Threatened by some colors - truly pathetic

[-] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

TBF I'd feel rather threatened if they start doing swastika sidewalks, and that's just some lines in the shape of an Indian peace symbol.

Or black-white-red stripes (German Imperium, popular with Nazis here because the actual Nazi flag is forbidden).

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
689 points (99.6% liked)

196

6835 readers
3310 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS