267
So by typical GOP posturing, Nancy Mace is a trans female. Every accusation/action is an admission.
Marginalizing out groups and grifting is all the GOP seems to be able to do.
That's all conservatives have done for decades - punch down, and destroy shit that others have built.
So the lady is delusional and should be barred from holding any office.
At least any office that requires a clearance and mental health screening. (/s - kick her ass to the curb)
What a cunt.
This is the stupid bitch that acted like having a homosexual ask her questions about town halls in a store meant she was being attacked or something, right?
The gays once spoke to her. She never got over it
...and yet somehow a dick as well.
And also an asshole...
Dicks also fuck assholes
I still remember a "friend" who I'm considering making an ex-friend, try to tell me that she wasn't transphobic, she just had trauma.
No she's transphobic, and I'm tired of pretending TERFs have legitimate grievances with trans women.
Jim Crow was built because it was "common sense" that white women's safety demanded the exclusion of black men and women from society. Segregated washrooms existed because white women "didn't feel comfortable" sharing restrooms with black women.
Honestly, she's probably a closeted FtM who is overcompensating.
I heard mace opened a youtube channel where she is thirst trapping (dressing very provokatively) all the geriatrics with her big fake tits and such. She is one lost election away from opening an only fans account.
As a reminder of her character, she did a stand up routine at some congressional kind of roasting thing on Matt Gaetz about him sleeping with underage girls. Meanwhile she has been protected epstein and his associates.
A cynical operator to the core.
I don't know anything about her, but you're telling me this bitch has had gender affirming care, but wants to stop other people from doing the same‽ Ok, I'm not actually that surprised. That's typical Republican behavior.
If the jobs require mental health screenings, and trans people are supposedly mentally ill... surely they'll just fail, and there's no need for an additional ban. Surely, right?
Or are we about to hear that the radical left has somehow infiltrated all mental health screenings?
Mace to the face.
Ideally the very spicy and burning variety.
Or the big metal ball with spikes kind.
I don't like her.
Terfs 🤢
Nancy Mace is not a radical feminist by any definition. She's vocally anti-abortion, she portrays LGBTQ+ people as child predators, and she was part of Trump's 2016 campaign even after the "grab 'em by the pussy" hot mic incident.
New acronym then: TEPOS
She’s also going around talking about UFOs. Not a serious person.
To be fair, the UAP things are real. We have them on camera, with reliable witnesses. It defies explanation, I reject aliens just because of the unfathomably large distances between solar systems and my belief that warp speed is not a real thing.
If I had to guess, I would go for some kind of hologram technology. That is the most logical explanation I can think of.
That said, she is not a serious person, she opened a youtube channel where she is showing off her fake boobs and such very provokatively, enticing all the geriatrics running the party and business I presume.
"reliable witness" here are pilots, many years after the events took place. Sure, I expect them to be good at flying, and identifying enemy aircraft while flying, but they also make mistakes. Do you know how many doctors have falsely identified things in a body? They're trained a lot more, and a body is significantly more consistent than literally everything in the air.
From what I've seen, basically all of the recordings are consistent with an object moving slowly in the air closer than what the pilot thinks. This makes small movements, or just the aircraft movements, appear faster. Hologram technology is not a logical explanation.
It is well documented, there are multiple multiple instances, caught on camera verified by pilots, and a great number of witnesses.
Your explanation doesn't fit, at all, and you haven't read the evidence closely enough clearly.
Sorry, but I have. There's no need for extraordinary explanations. Every one of the events can be explained by ordinary means. People just want it to be something else.
If you're interested Mick West is a great resource.
There’s no need for extraordinary explanations.
Do the Gimbal video and Commander David Fravor's tic tac, which were released by the DoD as part of its UAP stuff, have no need for extraordinary?
Nope! (Un)Surprisingly, there are perfectly mundane possible explanations! We can't say for sure what it is, but there's no need for anything extraordinary.
(There are more videos on the subject on his channel if you want to see more.)
People in the current administration are pandering to people like yourself trying to gather supporters. That’s all she is doing, along with others like Tim Burchett.
None of this invalidates UFOs.
Well, since rules don't matter anymore, maybe the next dem led gov (if it ever comes) should ignore them all, too.
Yes, let's worry about an issue effecting like .01% of most people's lives rather than healthcare, political corruption, government surveillance, inflation, or 1,000 other critical problems. Outstanding candidate.
The goal is always to be evil. Why would they be helping the average people when they can be evil to a minority to the point where there's a visible uptick of suicides in the wake of the policies they make?
On the subject of focusing on the wrong thing, affecting.
Well akshually it's estimated that 1% of Americans identify as trans.
I guess getting those tattoos wasn't enough to fix her
Timely
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
267 points (98.9% liked)
politics
31107 readers
1885 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS