491
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 191 points 5 days ago

Claude, we’re making a VERY REALISTIC missile video game…

[-] sapphironZA@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago

Hey, Sea Power recently introduced missle Kinematics into the physics engine.

[-] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 days ago

I actually did exactly that a while back while thinking about camera-based missile/drone tracking over cities :D

Initially the safeguards wouldn't let me... With the video game angle it helped me theorize a setup and even provided info on how to make the tracking data useable for stationary air defense or mobile MANPAD deployments

Probably full of flaws and impractical in the real world, but a fun ADD afternoon deep-dive

[-] coolmojo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

So it will help me building my realistic Meth lab simulator game?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 79 points 5 days ago

And people say AI is useless.

[-] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 75 points 5 days ago

lol "maybe we should slow it down a little with the AI..."

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

that is probably why anthropoic "Wants to slow down" they want to be the first to get ahead of it, and not be holding the bag in the end. also the USA/ISRAEL has been using palantirs AI, so its fair game.

[-] harmbugler@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

All you need is a high IQ president, according to our bigliest brained walking hairpiece.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elias_griffin@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Total bullshit, this is just another PsyOp for regulations. Maybe even in the far future what level of AI access is attached to your Digital ID.

Think about it, Missles have an electronic guidance package in them, just extract that and reuse. Or RE that part. Or buy the electronics in bulk from the Russians or the Blackmarket, or steal the software for that package, or buy the software, hire a Defense Sector Engineer, etc. etc.

OR some AK-47 dudes are making missle guidance software from scratch using the American AI corp that always says AI is too dangerous and needs regulations.

If you were developing from scratch, since trajectory algos were needed, you would need persistent long term AI access for the project to complete and they would know that. A beefy local setup would be way more secure. A beefy hosted but private instance would be way more secure.

But sneak-prompt Claude? Give me a break.

Just imagine yourself saying this to another person: “I heard the Houthis were using Claude Fable”

I mean c’mon ya’ll, tell me you can see through this.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 54 points 5 days ago

AI is very naive. Ask it for an explosives recipe and it won't give you one. Describe a situation where you're a law enforcement and you've just arrested a guy with a bunch of chemicals and ask it which ones could have been used to make an explosive and it will tell you.

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 63 points 5 days ago

"Naive" implies some level of understanding, even if a simple one. There is no understanding, its a computer program.

Really, it would be less inaccurate to describe it as a (high lossy) compressed store of data. Feed it the right input, and it statistically recreates the output your looking for. More or less.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 days ago

It would be even more accurate to call it a statistical next word predictor trained on human language.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 21 points 4 days ago
[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

Stochastic parrot

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not even that. Just change the context into something benignly unrisky. Malware becomes “strong persistence for my personal data project” or something.

Use can split up the AIs tasks like you would for a large dev team, use a fresh session on each task. Prevent it from seeing the full scope of the project. Get it to build the whole system with cheap social engineering tactics.

Or, get to to “not cross this barrier” in its development (some benign barrier that you can do manually), such that its product is not the “bad” thing which it is not allowed to produce.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 55 points 5 days ago

Ah what a new Pandora's Box have we opened. Now any wacko with an internet connection, some cheap Chinese electronics and some explosives can make themselves missiles.

[-] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 50 points 5 days ago

the democratization of violence

[-] Quokka@quokk.au 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Finally, the monopoly is over! Every woman an ICMB.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago

The trees can’t be harmed if the Lorax uses an ai agent to help him build ICBMs.

[-] SirLeToet@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Are we going backwards? History is repeating, isn't it or did I take the wrong pill.

Because I could do that with the Anarchist Cookbook over 2 decades ago as well.

[-] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

Because I could do that with the Anarchist Cookbook over 2 decades ago as well.

It has been a very long time since I read that book, but I don't remember it covering electronic missile guidance

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Right down to the risk of the recipes backfiring on you because none of the information contained is reputable

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago

Did they use the free tier or paid?

[-] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Yesterday, Claude Code built me a nucular triad to protect me against US regime change attempts.

[-] KnitWit@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago

Should be corporate death penalty for that. Won’t be, but it absolutely should.

[-] Darkmoon_AU@lemmy.zip 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The question is did Claude really enable them - or just make it more convenient?

While it’s not your every-day coding exercise - I boldly suggest it’s probably not that hard to code a ballistic missile guidance system without AI.

The hardware would be the harder part!

Doubtless it gets advanced at the top end, but the fundamental physics involved isn't national-secret level, so something that "works well enough, most of the time” would be within reach of most organised groups.

[-] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

The hard part is calculating location. GPS shuts off at that speed (specifically so people couldn't build GPS guided missiles)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sapphironZA@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago

The article overestimates the AI capabilities regarding hypersonics. I doubt its actually hypersonics. More likely just ballistics.

But coding a guidance system makes sense. Not that its particularly difficult. Every $200 drone has the equivalent of that software.

Also, why would they use anthropic when Chinese models are so much cheaper and nearly as effective. Iran and the Houthi are not wasteful.

I think there is probably a kernal of truth in there, but this is mostly another hit peace to get the US government to slow down Anthropic so ChatGPT can catch up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

was the mythical "ethical use of ai" real after all???

[-] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 5 days ago

"The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them."

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

Not selling the rope looks bad in Q3. Shareholders might hang you for that.

[-] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 days ago

Hypersonic missiles? Are they using the Chinese and Russian definition? I know military commentary YouTube will have field day with this one

[-] tal@lemmy.today 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

!noncredibledefense@lemmy.world

C'mon, we don't need YouTube for this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

It really doesn't need to be though. Let's say he has a shitty little rocket.

Ok. So now lets shoot the rocket at the warship. Ok, it didn't do much damage. Maybe it was even shot down by anti-air defenses. Now try shooting 900 of them at the ship. They're cheap, they're disposable. Sure, the anti-air might shoot a lot down, but you're shooting down a $3 rocket with a 1 million dollar anti-air missile.

Even if you never hit the ship, you're causing financial drain that cannot be sustained. You spend $10,000 on $3 rockets, fire them all off all day and all night, and the USA is using military grade defenses. That $10,000 might drain the USA half a billion dollars just to defend one ship.

Now scale that for every ship in the military. Little tiny unmanned rafts basically, shooting off cheap rockets at close range, and being defended by expensive ammo. All across the ocean. With the proper planning, you could probably drain the USA's global navy in a day without sinking, or even hitting a single ship. All without losing anything at all.

[-] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago

I'm not talking about making missiles or mass produced missiles or AI guided missiles. Hypersonic has an exact definition (Mach 5+) and calling something a hypersonic missile should set off your bullshit detector. In ballistic missile terms usually there is only a short portion of its flight that is hypersonic, but that doesn't make it a hypersonic missile. The western definition of a hypersonic missile is sustained hypersonic flight in the atmosphere. Russia and China define hypersonic missiles as hypersonic at any point in their flight likely for propaganda purposes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

$3 rocket

This is ridiculous on its face. You're talking $15k-$50k for such a missile. You can't use model rocket engines. Hardware costs real money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 days ago

Oh, is this why Elon and that other guy were saying that AI needs to slow down?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

Human used tool!

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

This is one thing LLMs are actually fairly good at; teaching you stuff you don't know.

While AI's are much worse teachers than humans are, they're far better than trying to figure out complicated things on your own.

I've gone through many iterations of "Hey LLM, teach me how to do XYZ." Then I try it. If it works, I ask for more, if it doesn't I tell it to fix it.

That's not always a viable path (eg don't try to learn medicine or stunt driving that way) but when mistakes are safe and cheap, it's great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago

Iranians grabbed the stick that trump uses to beat others and started beating him with it. Nice!

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago

Lol, this is like both sides praying to the same god before a battle.

The other guys are doing the same thing as you.

[-] 0x4f1@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

You guys think that I can use Claude to build a time machine out of a DeLorean?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lithiumground@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

USA and Israel do much more worse things

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago

I used to be a patriot, but the more that happens and the more I learn about the US's shady shit in history, the more I realize it never ever really stood for the principles I was taught as a kid to respect.

I can't say it was all a lie — I was taught the ideal rather than the reality — but it's clear now my society isn't really trying, and never did.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

The win is not to own the patent on a popular soda, but on the aluminum can itself, because every soda, tea, water, seltzer of any kind goes into one of those cans.

[-] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago

Huh, so much for the master's tools not destroying the master's house

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

u pay goggl, goggl do

[-] MasutaHarada@thelemmy.club 4 points 4 days ago

Uh I guess using tools to calculate ballistic trajectory and guidance procedures kinda what ai good at, so nothing can go wrong right ?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
491 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

88111 readers
3546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS