288

Iconic PlayStation hacker and homebrew developer Andy ‘TheFlow0’ Nguyen has abandoned the ongoing PS5 Linux project due to the rise of AI vibe-coders in open-source spaces.

Nguyen, who famously created the first kernel exploit for the PlayStation Vita, has spent over a decade creating exploits and homebrew for PlayStation systems. As one of the leaders behind the ongoing PS5 Linux project, which brought modern PC gaming to the console, the developer was also bringing the full Linux OS experience to Sony’s PS5 with miraculous results.

In an update on social media, the modder announced that they would be “stepping away from the PS5 scene” as well as ending their work on PS5 Linux. “After pouring my heart and months of my life into it, including plans to finish PS5 Pro support and release in 2027, it’s all down the sink,” they said.

Nguyen, like many other homebrew developers recently, explained that they are ending the project due to the rise of AI vibe-coders in open-source spaces. Recently, brilliant PlayStation 3 emulator RPCS3 announced a ban on vibe coding participants due to the fact that vibe-coders in open-source spaces are submitting code that they do not actually understand.

In Nguyen’s words, “the scene used to be a group of highly talented researchers, but now it is just a bunch of noobs using LLMs and writing hacks they don’t even understand”. Additionally, it seems that vibe-coders, or “slop kiddies” as the modder dubbed them, used AI to detect a bug that they were using to crack consoles, and reported it to Sony for a bounty.

“Slop kiddies found the only hypervisor bug left, which I had also found a while ago, and decided to report to Sony,” the modder said on social media. “I asked them to at least wait for GTA 6 to come out so that people would have the opportunity to legally purchase the game and also enjoy linux. They agreed to wait, but not a day passed and they decided to waste it instead.”

With this in mind, it seems that the progress on PS5 Linux for consoles on newer OS versions may have been ruined by the reporting of this bug. This means that the last version of PS5 Linux to be helmed by the modder is the currently available Version 2.5 which supports PS5 Phat and Slim console running 3.00-7.61 firmwares.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

To save you a click and strip all of the anti-AI circle jerking for people who actually want to understand what happened:

Another user discovered the hypervisor exploit that TheFlow0 was using and turned it in for bounty money. Without a working hypervisor bypass exploit, the project is moot.

[-] sinza@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago

Vibe-coders (actually probably will steal "slop kiddies") ruin a good thing yet again.

I turn to retrocomputing to get away from it all because I would expect people in that world to generally agree this is horrible and there's somehow vibe-coding there too. I'm so tired of this.

[-] Brosplosion@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 hours ago

I've said this many many times, but lowering the skill floor for tasks inevitably drops the average quality down. Mathematically provable even.

There's a reason a lot of the tech made in the 50s/60s/70s/80s was amazing because it was made by the brightest of minds whereas the everday person didn't have the skills to get over the floor. Think moon landing, xerox, and many other analog systems.

There used to be barriers for entry into these spaces that would ensure effort is done to participate, with low effort garbage being filtered by the minimum impetus. Now that writing code can be "effortless" you end up with a lot more garbage there is no filter for. Same for all skillsets impacted by AI. Graphic design being another big one that comes to mind.

[-] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Why the hell would you even search for an report that bug? Surely there are better bug bounties to be had...

That aside, by all means, use AI if you want to, but don't spam FOSS projects with it like wth. If you want to use AI, check the projects policy first, and if they permit it, look at the code you generated, test it and declare that you used AI so the maintainers are aware.

And please don't try to contribute code to anything if you don't know shit about coding. Nobody needs your help to write a prompt. I don't know where people get the idea that anyome needs them to tell an AI what to do. If I could just tell an AI and be done with it, I would fucking be done with it.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I think it’s telling that llama.cpp, the interface engine for LLMs on desktops, has blanket banned vibe coded PRs, as they simply cannot deal with them with the manpower they have.

…An LLM inference project. Banning LLM vibe coding.

I remember a collective groan from the devs when Google’s TurboQuant paper trended on Twitter, and they knew there’d be a flood of Claude PRs to “implement” the feature, even though most of it already existed in the engine.


vllm (the premiere enterprise server inference engine) is quite careful about them too, though they use bots to filter them and have more manpower to cull what slips through.

[-] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

At my job, its extremely clear when someone used an llm to write their code, mainly because they change 250+ lines at a time and the code exists somewhere else in a more efficient form. Honestly most of my code reviews have been rejected with an existing library cited.

I hate AI.

[-] verily@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 hours ago

I've heard some variety of "programmers like writing code more than reading it"

I can only imagine what it's like to remove the former and pile on heaps more of the latter

[-] kurwa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It sucks ass. I barely even want to / care to read my coworkers code. It used to be nice to read the way one person writes their code, having their own way about things. Now it's all the same shit.

[-] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 106 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

“used AI to detect a bug that they were using to crack consoles, and reported it to Sony for a bounty.”

Wow, what a fucking loser. This was probably the kid who reminded the teacher that they forgot to assign homework.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 9 hours ago

“used AI to detect a bug that they were using to crack consoles, and reported it to Sony for a bounty.”

Wow, that's literally "McDonalds burger flipper who narc'd on Luigi" level of stupid. And they are likely about to obtain the same amount of prize...

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 hours ago

plot twist: some of the slop kiddies are sony employees that infiltrated the project.

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 41 points 9 hours ago

The problem is that AI empowers the biggest idiots

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 13 points 6 hours ago

And the smallest idiots too

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

And the medium sized idiots.

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 78 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I've abandoned all my open-source projects too. I've gotten a lot of PRs lately, and each time I look, it's bad AI-generated code that I never want to merge.

That and I don't even see the point of maintaining finely-crafted handmade code in that sea of mediocre fast-paced slop. It's just not fun and I'm not interested anymore.

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 39 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Ive had some luck running on codeberg. Reduces the AI slop on some of my popular libraries by a huge percentage. I also have a mirror on my own server but thats more for my own usage.

[-] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 10 hours ago

That's totally understandable. I still write software for myself, but for now I don't put it on Github anymore. It's just for me, to learn new tools, improve myself and have fun.

I don't want to deal will all this nonsense. My contributions to OSS projects have extremely gone down, largely due to lack of motivation.

I'll still write public code here and there, but only if there's no sign of AI. For example, I contributed to Tracky this year, which is a PHP application for tracking movies and TV shows.

[-] dil@piefed.zip 6 points 8 hours ago

If I have ai fix something I just make a bug report telling them what I had ai fix for myself, I don't push it for anyone else and update to the actual version when they fix the bug correctly

[-] jahtnamas@slrpnk.net 41 points 10 hours ago

these idiots think they're helping (or rather, they want recognition without doing any work) but they're basically just creating virtual asbestos. turning in that bug bounty was especially heinous.

i was considering getting a PS5 purely for the linux stuff but i guess not now. not that i had PS5 money anyway, even gently used...

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 22 points 9 hours ago

turning in that bug bounty was especially heinous.

witnessing that would've been the end of the project for me, too.

[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, I can't imagine being an open source developer for a popular program these days. They get absolutely flooded with slop, constantly. I wouldn't be surprised if it somehow makes open source die, or at least go into the shadows.

[-] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 15 points 8 hours ago

I wouldn't be surprised if that's the goal.

To be honest though, it's not gonna happen. It may kill GitHub eventually, but AI slop isn't really much of a problem on platforms that don't actively promote and sell it (e.g. Codeberg/Forgejo).

Devs will just migrate their projects off of GH; some already have. FOSS is too strong a movement to be killed by the corporate bullshit machine.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Don’t forget they’re also taking our hardware and making it so expensive that the only viable option for most people will be a tablet with 4GB ram and 128GB storage.

“Don’t worry! You can save all your important documents and play all your favorite games on the cloud! Just look at our security certified App Store!”

They don’t ever want us to see source code again.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

There's the other side too, though.

People who never had the time to maintain the projects they created ages ago, because the projects make little to no money in donations so they have full time jobs. Some of them have resorted to LLMs because nobody else is stepping up (and can you even trust randos to take over stewardship of your project? Remember Jia Tan!) and now catch hate for that, when previously they caught hate for not getting enough done.

I previously never made any of my projects open source because I just wouldn't have time to maintain them anyway. Now I could ease the workload with AI, but I'd rather not deal with either end of the AI issue: I don't want people sending random ass pull requests and bug reports that clearly haven't been reviewed by a human that knows what's up, and I don't want to catch a bunch of hate for using LLMs myself. Not a big loss for the open source community either way, the things I've created are fairly niche tools that you can just pay to get proprietary alternatives that would usually work better, having been in development for longer, by larger teams. Most people won't need them at all though.

[-] spring_cedar_dust@reddthat.com 8 points 9 hours ago

There are bots running round that are trying to generate revenue to pay for their token expenditure. I wonder if it was something like that flooding the bug bounties

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
288 points (98.6% liked)

Linux

19115 readers
868 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS