178
submitted 3 days ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

First author Dr. Olivia Bracken (UCL Department of Ageing, Rheumatology and Regenerative Medicine) said: "Our findings reveal a natural pathway that limits harmful immune cell expansion and helps calm inflammation more quickly.

"Targeting this mechanism could lead to safer treatments that restore immune balance without suppressing overall immunity. With chronic inflammation ranked as a major global health threat, this discovery opens a promising avenue for new therapies."

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

Title: Scientists discover hidden switch that shuts down inflammation.

In the article: "The treatment did not, however, significantly change outward signs such as redness or swelling."

Uhh...

[-] ItJustDonn@slrpnk.net 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Blocking sEH increased epoxy-oxylipin levels, helped pain resolve more quickly, and sharply reduced the number of intermediate monocytes found in both the blood and tissue. These immune cells have been linked to persistent inflammation and the progression of inflammatory disease.

redness/swelling aren't the only markers of inflammation in this context, as the cells that kick off the response do more harm than good when they wear out their welcome.

monocytes are white blood cells that develop in bone marrow. i'm curious/interested in whether the same treatment affects mast cells that develop in connective tissue

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

They spent several paragraphs talking about how the test was setup but then said, well, we didn't see anything, so it must be reacting at a deeper level.

Other than an apparent reduction in pain and a reduction in the number of monocytes, there was no mechanism to make the claim that they could switch off inflammation.

I was hoping for a little more than that.

The best claim the article should have made was they found a way to reduce monocytes, which have been shown to be associated with the body's inflammation response

They still don't even understand how the monocyte side of the equation really works either.

I don't disagree that this should lead to more testing, and I also hope that it might lead to better treatments but that title sits firmly in the "clickbait" arena for me.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 3 days ago

Yeah, uh… can I get some of that?

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

First you'll need insurance so they can start laundering the funny money. Oh look! Here it goes! All clean! Right into big pharma's pockets. Healthcare is a business after all. We couldn't run something like that to...cough...benefit humanity. That would be stupid.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I’ve been using a phosphdiesterase inhibitor for the past year and it’s a game changer. Expensive though, unless your insurance covers it.

This is a step further up the chain, which should mean fewer side effects and a more general effect on the entire system. And it’s with an already approved drug.

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Yes please. ASAP. I will even be a test subject.

[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 19 points 3 days ago

I'm willing to bet my life that there is some rich motherfucker salivating to monetize this like they did with insulin.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There was a woman i think 15 ish years ago that made herself the owner of the sun because of a loophole and i think it was that no country can take ownership of a celestial body (not yet anyway) but the rules didn't state that a person cannot take ownership, it didn't last long but it was an interesting exploit.

Nevermind, apparently it's still an ongoing battle,

https://www.gistlover.com/pay-me-for-sunlight-woman-who-registered-the-sun-as-her-own-wants-the-world-to-pay-for-it/

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

What’s the opposite of inflammation? Can it go too far in the other direction?

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 14 points 3 days ago

Bro joined the anti-deflamation league

[-] yestalgia@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes. Studies show that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like Advil and Tylenol can actually supress gains in the gym if taken in excess because the natural muscle breakdown, inflammation, and response mechanism is blunted. Same is true for ice baths. So, sometimes swelling and inflammation can be a good thing that we want to occur.

Also staying on prednisone and other steroids too long to supress inflammation leads to all kinds of issues.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Tylenol is not an NSAID. It doesn't work on inflammation.

Also, there was a study a year or so ago that found evidence that Ibuprofen after working out helped speed recovery times.

[-] yestalgia@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Speeding recovery times has a tradeoff though. It may be negligible but I heard on an exercise science podcast of some kind that it blunts the recovery process so if maximizing muscle growth is your goal, don't overdo nsaids.

However, like you said, if you're an NFL athlete during the season then recovery is the priority over muscle growth and then ice baths and nsaids and inflammation reducing things are worth the trade off.

My mistake on Tylenol being an nsaid. Obvious hindsight. Brain fart.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

This week's UC London miracle cure.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
178 points (97.8% liked)

News

39243 readers
2746 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS