125
submitted 1 day ago by FirstCircle@lemmy.ml to c/news@lemmy.world

"At the strong request of the United States Military, and for National Security purposes, I have agreed to convert the magnificent Triumphal Arch... into a top grade Military Complex/Triumphal Arch," Trump wrote on the social media platform.

Trump added that the arch near the National Mall will "house, store, and have the rapid ability to use large numbers of drones, plus Snipers, on both the roof and plaza areas, and additionally have and hold large quantities of sniper ammunition in storage."

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 6 points 23 hours ago

That is the plan of an 11-year-old boy.

[-] spacehulk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

What foreign attacks are happening on American soil within range of this arch? None? Oh right, this it to be used against citizens.

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago

Next month it'll be sharks with laser beams glued to their heads.

[-] Aganim@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

With the current state of the economy I'm afraid he'll have to settle for ill-tempered sea bass.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

And they will guard the reflection pool from Aunt Tifa

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

If we did more social programs and less snipers and drones, we'd be a much better country. And we'd have fewer enemies abroad as well.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Because he has noticed that courts seem to be giving the President deference for things needed for "national security", so he thinks those are magic words that will make accountability go away.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It's working far too often.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

for “national security”, so he thinks those are magic words that will make accountability go away.

Is he wrong?

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Even from the "national security" standpoint, doesn't a predefined sniper's nest kind of defeat the point?

Not if the point is lethal surveillance of those coming and going in DC.

The fear they instill is part of the package.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I was already assuming that everything around the white House is covered by snipers anyway.

Yes, but pretty soon it's going to be the whole country.

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago

Same reason he's pretending to build military facilities under the ballroom: it's just a pretense to be allowed to build what he wants.

Otherwise it's just a dictator's vanity project with zero justification for the wasted taxpayer's money, and the courts can shut it down. But when there's military-anything involved, it becomes a defense project.

[-] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Because they expect a civil war, or some sort of massive uprising. And I'm not naive, I don't expect this to be some glorious, organized revolution of the shining proletariat. It will be chaotic, disjointed, and without goal (at least at first). Whether it'll be armed or not, peaceful or not (at least to start with), doesn't matter. They know DC will be a hot zone.

The same reason he's building a nuclear proof bunker. The same reason he released, and has normalized, the national guard around DC. Whether he knows this, or his handlers, I don't really think it matters. They know that something will break eventually. Yes, I know we all call out Americans' apathy and make doomer jokes about them never rising up. But there IS another great depression coming (not recession, depression), gas will almost certainly go past $6 or $7 a gallon nationwide, food will become completely unaffordable, I suspect over 40% of people will be unemployed. And unlike the first Great Depression, we have mass surveillance, AI, a world MUCH MUCH more dependent on central supply chains, and so much more shit.

They know something is coming. Yes, USians suck and are so fucking apathetic, but that will crack eventually.

[-] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

Drumpfuck is also delusional.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

'National security reasons' can these days be used for anything really and people seem to just accept that that's how it is...

For national security reasons you can no longer eat bananas 🤷‍♂️

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

of course not, bananas are radioactive.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Roman triumphal arch was used to commemorate victorious generals or significant public events such as the founding of new colonies, the construction of a road or bridge, the death of a member of the imperial family or the accession of a new emperor.

Oh wait so he wants an oversized purpose built triumphal arch that has those meanings and has function? It will need to be huge. I wonder if there was another famous fascist that had the same goal.

Schwerbelastungskörper... was one component of a plan to redesign the center of Berlin as an imposing, monumental capital reflecting the spirit of Nazi Germany as envisioned by Hitler.

😒

Is this the same arch with gaps filled with spray foam?

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

And gold leaf. Can't forget the gold leaf. Did I mention it'll be covered in gold leaf? Gold leaf.

Can we put him in the bunker already

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Hitler personally designed German flak towers which he seemed fascinated by, so I’m not surprised to see yet another poor imitation from Don.

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I look forward to that stupid waste of OUR TAX MONEY gets taken down

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago

Those golden eagles can have laser eyes to shoot down any incoming missiles (or bags of drugs catapulted over the border by MS-13, for that matter).

The incoming missiles to justify this can be provided by the fact that there’s now a prominent structure packed with ammunition standing at the centre of the US capital, a target too good to pass up.

[-] FluidBeef@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

Will there be a hanger for flying cars and a walk-in wardrobe where Trump can change into crime fighting costumes for all sorts of different environments?

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

In other words, nobody is funding it for him, so he's come up with an excuse to use military funds to build it.

[-] BC_viper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I cant help but be reminded by civil war that came out in 2024. How the Whitehouse was so defended. Guess this would be the start of that buildup.

[-] Monument@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

So he’s identifying useful targets, if someone wanted to stage an actual violent attack?

By virtue of having said that, you could almost be assured that the military would not use it for such purpose, except to serve as a visible threat against peaceful protestors.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
125 points (97.0% liked)

News

39262 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS