1056
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

at this rate Winamp might get more profitable than OpenAI and it is free.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

But isn't OpenAI just burning billions of moneys already? In that case Winamp is already more profitable

[-] ExtraJudgement@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Proprietary frontier LLMs in companies riddled with highly suspect business practices.

My local LLM setup has absolutely been making the equivalence of positive cashflow for me since gemma 4 and qwen 3.8: I need less total time for several groups of annoying (but necessary) tasks, which means my productivity is up and I can use the rest as my own free time.

[-] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 hour ago

I need less total time for several groups of annoying (but necessary) tasks

Such as? Just curious what people use LLMs for.

[-] antiR@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

I handle so many text files in my job and LLMs help make the scripts for me to handle these text files. I know it is important to at least know stuff like regex but I am not a superhuman. It is difficult for me to heavily specialize in scripting while also specialize in the technicalities of my job. To help show why it is difficult to specialize scripting, I work with hardware description languages which have a different syntax from scripting languages. Handling different languages causes confusion on the proper syntax even with a basic if else statement because the syntax is different between languages.

Aside from this, it can also help me automate describing what the sequences I created in the file for easy documentation. I just have to instruct the "patterns" it needs to look for. I just need to proofread the output and do minor fixes.

[-] spacegoat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

My crooked spotted cock is more profitable than OpenAI

[-] affenlehrer@feddit.org 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

I like LLMs and also the research but I think we're at a point where one could make a pause, turn the models into silicon and sell them as hardware for people who are actually interested.

That would solve all privacy problems, eliminate many data centers, subscription fees, internet dependencies and allow for slower and more thoughtful upgrades (hardware isn't updated as often as software). That would be a pretty sovereign solution.

However, from a company perspective they can't force it on everyone anymore, don't get all the juicy data from all the users and can't sell subscriptions any more and change everything on their side.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago

turn the models into silicone

The models are data, and silicone is rubber. So... I don't know what you're proposing here.

[-] affenlehrer@feddit.org 1 points 27 minutes ago

Fixed it. We don't use this silly silicon word here. I picked the wrong one. We call it Silicium Sodium is Natrium, Potassium is Kalium, Aluminum is Aluminum etc.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

I believe he is suggesting we turn them into very large breasts, or in some cases big booties, depending on your preference and what part of the world you're in.

[-] affenlehrer@feddit.org 1 points 23 minutes ago

That is correct. Very comforting

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 3 points 13 hours ago

Might mean "silicon", but might want to bang the LLM. Hard to know.

Words have meaning...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rothe@piefed.social 76 points 1 day ago

Your local grocery store is more profitable than OpenAI. In fact you are more profitable than OpenAI.

OpenAI owes hundreds of billions of dollars, with a revenue a fraction of that. They will never become profitable.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

They will never become profitable.

If you look at OpenAI as a single, independent, private company then they appear unprofitable. But when you look at them as a means of laundering Pentagon money and other federal contracts into straw purchases for NVIDIA and Oracle, they are immensely profitable.

AI is a Loss Leader. It props up the production and sale of hardware, which has been fruitful for its partners, its investors, and the economy as a whole. It is a digital form of induced demand in so far as new construction creates a "virtuous" cycle of increasing consumption, as more and more of the business and public sector is dragged into its orbit.

The end-game for OpenAI is to have a captured market of businesses and government institutions. Whole sectors of the economy devoid of human knowledge workers who are hopelessly addicted to AI Agent processes, because nobody managing the companies actually know what these agents are doing anymore. At this point, Altman and Amodei can charge whatever they damned well please for token traffic, because there's no bureaucracy capable of competing with them.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

Most of the money getting funneled to Nvidia came from them in the first place. That's why they're one of the chatbot's biggest cheerleaders.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] m532@lemmy.ml 10 points 20 hours ago

Capitalists: Noo its bad, see, it doesn't make profit

Communists: Free AI for everyone

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kurt_vonnegut2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So you're saying we should be pumping all our savings and pension money in WinRar?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

“I remember once my father and I were walking down Fifth Avenue and there was a homeless person sitting right outside of Trump Tower and I remember my father pointing to him and saying, ‘You know, that guy has $8 billion more than me,’ because he was in such extreme debt at that point, you know?”

~ Ivanka Trump

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 27 points 23 hours ago

I refuse to believe that Trump is capable of such introspection.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago

Believe it or not, Trump's become dumber with age.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago

They'll reclassify it as a necessary utility like water or power and tax more subsidies for paying billionaires even more from public coffers before admitting it's mostly just search engines & corporate social media eating their own tail.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
1056 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

16258 readers
2136 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS