I'm not seeing any actual AI use in the linked commit. There are some instructions for how contributors should use AI (which is honestly a good idea for every project, even if you just say "don't," as it can reduce the amount of low-quality nonsense that comes in), but no actual evidence that the person who pushed the commit is using AI.
I really wish people would learn what actual AI usage looks like before they called "AI" on something like this. It weakens the case when people call out actual AI usage and abuse.
dansup may be an awful person, but if he is this isn't why.