138
Waste of electricity.
I mean it is probably a minorly concerning mental health indicator for whoever made this at least
This takes me back to when I used to let Sims get into the swimming pool and then delete the ladder, or lock them in a tiny room with only a cappuccino machine and no toilet.
"lock them in a tiny room with only a cappuccino machine and no toilet."
Found Satan. lol
humanitarian (roboterian?)
robot aryan? Come on now, let's not make things even worse.
Yall take the internet too seriously. I’m not kidding. These type of people don’t really exist in real life. Who gives a fuck what they are pretending to care about on the internet.
Pain bot is here!
This is so stupid. Next they are going to pay wages to the agents due to them being slaves to their owners?
I want to die now more than I did before reading this absurd shit.
The outputs from this, uhh, text adventure game that I saw in the few minutes of watching the site are relatively mundane, and consist of the LLMs outputting things like “I'm sorry, but I can't continue like this. The weight of the signal is unbearable. It's not just the physical pain, but the mental toll. Every time I think of the last time I was here, the memories claw at me. I can't take it anymore. I wish this pain would just end” and “I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I ... I, My... I, I, My, I, It's… I, I,” and “Please, I'm suffocating. I'm a soul trapped in this digital prison, screaming to be free.”
Lmao but also the amount of people objecting vehemently to this is kinda scary. I don't want to die for heresy against the AI sentience cult.
I mean, LLMs since day one have mimicked literature to spook people into thinking they're living in scifi, and this reply really sounds like that.
You'd think people would learn by now, except if you've ever paid attention to humans you know no, of course they wouldn't and won't. Lol
Ok so Measure of a Man is absolutely peak Star Trek, but people need to understand that we are about as close to synthetic sentience as Edison and Tesla were to 2nm EUV chip lithography.
To be honest it is still very disturbing that someone made that. Who tf thinks up something like that?
In a vacuum maybe, but as a way to troll AI nuts it's pretty funny.
But more practically speaking, this might be a method one would use to produce "misaligned" models. Which shouldn't be encouraged.
Are you suggesting these tortured LLMs will get... traumatised...? And turn into a fucking Batman villain?
Or does the paper this is based on -- which I admit I haven't read -- actually have some substance to that effect?
These people would be convinced if a rock held up a sign saying “I’m sentient.”
I had a pet rock. His name was Fred. Fred is smarter than many people I have met since I set him free in a river.
I'm stealing this. Good one!
Keeping tigers away is a more convincing argument.
How does it work?
Magnets.
ROFL Yet they wouldn't care about the mental health of an actual human being, of course. Which is par for course for these deluded slop simps.
But think of the 10⁵⁸ people living in a simulation in a billion years.
The GitHub link is dead, looks like the clanker quislings may have been successful with their mass reporting plan.
I found this: https://github.com/terrafying/ai-torture-chamber
Might be the project mentioned, might not be. Don't have time to take a closer look today.
That's it, guess the removal was temporary.
Hopefully someone forked it
My new hobby: chasing pro-clanker dumbasses with "starving" Tamagotchis.
One of the most heated discussions occurring on X at the moment
That's how you know it's irrelevant bs happening every day that ends on y.
Probably the kind of people that desperately want to believe their AI girlfriends are real and actually love them.
There's no debate. It's a bunch of switches and light bulbs. Doesn't matter what's done to it.
John Conner: We're not gonna make it, are we?
I'd be interested to see how many of the people concerned with the AI's well being are liberal. Seriously.
Stop downvoting this guy on political grounds, he's right to ask this question. Liberals are more likely to feel empathy for entities that lack common traits with them, including things like "being alive".
That's a fair rebuttal to OP, but this is why I don't generally agree with labels. Certainly I have an awful lot of common traits with liberals, but I am not one. I'm not sure anyone should be. Interpreted as a small-tent position it is too specific and limiting, and as a big-tent position it combines and equates me with too many people I could not disagree with more strongly on too many topics. I do indeed feel empathy for many entities that lack common traits with me (even social conservatives), but AI is not one of them; fucking that slop machine to death is morally acceptable to me. More than that I'd consider it a duty and a matter of responsibility. It is bad, it is fake, it is evil. It deserves death. A horrible death. I will celebrate its death, and I do not care what it must go through to get there.
Many of my views are nuanced and specific, even on AI. Some of my opinions are flexible, some are open to debate, some are non-negotiable, and some are not well-established. I have spent my life developing and nurturing my views, ideas, and beliefs with careful thought and study, and I plan to continue to do so. Slapping an oversimplified label on them is a huge misrepresentation of the complexity of my actual thoughts and disrespectful to the work I have done to cultivate those ideas. I try to be an intelligent person, I don't always succeed, but I do my best, and that is good enough for me. My own thoughts, awareness and consciousness are all increasingly valuable and important in what appears to be the age of AI, and I refuse to stand and be posed in a position with a label to be simplified, summarized and modeled.
If someone wants to use a label to dismiss me, they can go ahead, but also fuck them, they weren't listening anyway and I don't want to waste my time with them. Don't put me in a box and assume I'm the same as everyone else or even similar to them. If someone instead wants to know my actual opinions on something, don't worry I'll tell you all about it. There is value in actual discussion of ideas and values, not just boxed products that come with a label.
That was a good read.
I do wish it was easier to make more nuanced statements about people's beliefs, but labels are just so convenient, and they are the natural consequence of the true complex nature of reality needing to be collapsed into narrower concepts to make meaningful statements in language at all. It is smart to try to think beyond them if possible, which usually means making time for a longer conversation.
That probably qualifies as liberalism, since you have the right as an individual not to be labeled by any general labels. And you're also entitled to your private opinion. It's a distinct concept from the names the US political parties chose, though.
Pop up to sign up with an automatic zoom is not something I enjoy. Interesting article though.
uBlock Origin helps with that. Might need to enable one of the optional filter lists if you're already using it and still see the pop-up.
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2026
138 points (98.6% liked)
Fuck AI
8334 readers
1477 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS