495
Wow! Six!
And bipartisan! Surely this will send a message
Literally it was a message they sent. Next I suppose they're going to do something about it.
Look I get it, but for the moment let’s be glad these six are doing something.. a lot more than the absolute nothing - or bootlicking - the others are doing.
I'm skeptical of any republican that has had the opportunity to keep Trump in check, but has not. This feels like an attempt to make them look better before rhe midterms.
load more comments
(1 replies)
let’s be glad these six are doing something
No. This is LITERALLY the least they can do apart from nothing. And 94 senators aren't even doing THAT much.
That's as worthy of celebration as Mitch McConnell completing a sentence without having a stroke or Hakeem Jeffries neglecting to call a common sense progressive candidate with more popular policy positions than himself "dangerous" or "extreme left".
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
There are (half) dozens of us!
load more comments
(1 replies)
I sure hope it was strongly worded.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It’s time to bring up the Epstein files again.
Oh oh. trump is going to be in big trouble for not consulting congress. This is the one thing that they absolutely will not stand for. /s
Imagine if he just struck a real deal with Iran. This crisis, of Trump's own making would resolve itself.
Susan Collins is very concerned. She might write a letter.
"He learned his lesson"...
Did she furrow her brow yet? Clutch any pearls?
Alternative headline:
94 senators in favor of or indifferent towards heavily sponsoring the war crimes of a geopolitical adversary.
It's not as snappy but more relevant to the state of things
94 senators in favor of or indifferent towards heavily sponsoring the war crimes of a geopolitical adversary.
94? Dems hold 47 seats and their actions have been carte blanche in favor of Ukraine. So, their position is well known. Its 49 Republican senators that act indifferent.
their position is well known
Yet their silence amidst the most blatant act of favoritism of the second Trump infestation is deafening.
You think the message will have more of an effect if it's signed by 46 Dems and 4 Republicans?
There's a calculated weight to assuring that the Republican signatures outweigh Democrat ones
six ? that's... disappointing
Trump (Krasnov) can't unsuck Putin's dick.
I love Russian cream! 🫲🍊🫱
That's an emoji I can't unsee. I'm in shock and vomiting at the same time.....
Use it wisely my friend.
Syphilitic old shitstain betrayed the U.S., E.U and Ukraine in a single phone call.
It's performative. Russia doesn't produce nearly enough disel to satisfy US needs.
This is so that when Ukraine inevitably blows up more Russian refineries Trump can withdraw whatever support is left for Ukraine.
“These 6 senators don’t want you to have cheap gas!”
—MAGA
Here is my thing. How in the world is JD Vance not quietly building support for the 25th? Like that might be the only thing that could save them in the election.
But even if they still plan on cheating, Trump is literally nothing more than a liability at this point.
I mean, if we knew he was doing it, it wouldn't be so quiet. Too much of his cabinet (which would need to vote for it) are unwavering Trump sycophants, but maybe there are enough not-Pete-Hegseths that he could pull it off.
But for Vance's own sake, he may be best off waiting until after midterms/inauguration in case he needs to cut any deals with the next Congress.
Plus if he gets in after midterms he can serve two more terms (theoretically).
Probably because Vance has to be one of the most unpopular people ever. Seriously, they're hanging on because of the cult like devotion to trump. Nix him and go to Vance? Their support drops from high 20s to sub 10s
If Vance was plotting this, the 25th is not the way to go. He would need to get half the Cabinet on board, and then when Trump inevitably challenges it it would take 2/3 vote in both houses to toss Trump out.
It would be much better if Vance simply built up support for an impeachment vote. Trump is doing a ton of things that would have gotten anyone else booted by now. And then all that's needed of a simple majority in the House with no Cabinet input. Still 2/3 of the Senate, but that might end up being only about 15 Republicans after the elections.
Wouldn't doing that with less than half a term left mean that he could then only be elected for one term? So to maximize his own (and Thiel's) potential power, he'd want to do it right after January 20th. IANAL and obviously IADNACL.
300k tonnes of diesel isn't that much in the grand scheme of things.
In 2025, distillate (or diesel) fuel consumption (excluding biodiesel and renewable diesel) by the U.S. transportation sector was about 2.94 million barrels per day, or about 123 million gallons per day.
123,000,000 gallons per day. Diesel weighs 7 pounds per gallon so 861,000,000 pounds or 430,500 tons per day.
This first shipment will not cover 1 days fuel cost. But what it will do is give a big pile of money to Putin.
Just bought the midterms with taxpayer money.
Wait that means...
Thats about $500m of diesel purchase.
Essentially that's a transfer of $500m cash to Putin. Putin is collecting dues.
But it's enough for them to blame the Dems when things aren't magically fixed after they win in the Midterms. The idiots eat that shit up because they have absolutely no idea how a national economy works. Republican economic policies are consistently bad for everyone that's not in the 1% and yet they vote for them all the time because they're told told policies are good for them, regardless of the reality they deal with daily.
I feel like that's the worst part of this: he's undermined what had been a reasonably unified international campaign for what, like 2 days of diesel?
Not even a single day's worth. It's less than the transportation sector uses in a day.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Seems like a better idea to try undo the damage you caused yourself in the first place
load more comments
(1 replies)
Tuesday
I am pretty sure trump will listen /s
Six!? Why, that’s almost seven senators! That will surely get his attention.
You cant argue with cancer.
What?
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
495 points (100.0% liked)
politics
31382 readers
2174 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS