227
submitted 11 hours ago by Tudsamfa@lemmy.world to c/me_irl@lemmy.world
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

If one views them as discussions instead of arguments, they tend to turn out better.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Only if both sides do it.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 6 hours ago

On the other hand, one thing an internet argument (or other forms of public debate) can do is change the audience's minds, or bring them to your cause if they're uncommitted. Lenin became the effective Russian head of state in part by being good at debates.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 39 points 10 hours ago

On the other hand, there are times when I have written paragraphs of well sourced text on my phone, and just before pressing "Post" I realize that I don't care about it.

[-] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 9 points 8 hours ago

I've deleted more than I've posted here.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 19 points 9 hours ago

Sometimes it's more about convincing the random lurkers reading everything than convincing the person you're arguing against.

(Also, people rarely admit losing an argument and changing their mind in the moment. But later on, in private, they might change their views because of the argument.)

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

Hard agree, being down with lurk-gang for so long helped me flesh out a ton of opinions I'd otherwise be a chud about.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 24 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I generally never enter an online debate with the intention of convincing the other person of my point of view. I enter a debate to provide a (hopefully) strong counter argument for the benefit of the lurkers reading.

As an example, I am extremely unlikely to convince a tankie that the USSR's authoritarianism is a bad thing, but my arguments may help a less politically savy reader not become duped by a tankie's propaganda, and that's worthwhile to try for.

[-] Pratai@piefed.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

This is exactly what I do. I’m pretty much the unpopular opinion in most threads, but the point is to offer a nuanced take. Only, the problem is- nuance is frowned upon a lot nowadays.

[-] Zarobi@aussie.zone 3 points 7 hours ago

I do it to explore and solidify my own thoughts and beliefs. Otherwise they kind of just float around half-formed and

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

*recieves hundreds of downclicks for my long ass rant*

FUCK ALL YALL I'M RIIIIIIIGH

[-] CubitOom@infosec.pub 11 points 10 hours ago

Sometimes it's about clarifying your own thoughts.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 8 points 9 hours ago

Those arguments are for the onlookers.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

It's not about changing minds, it's about being right. 😎

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

According to this it's more about being homogenous and tuned into the platform hive-mind.

[-] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Good thing that argument fizzled out in a chase for internet points and nothing was taken out on the streets.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
227 points (99.1% liked)

me_irl

8357 readers
793 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS