47
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Edit: I intentionally put "bad people" in the title in order to provoke. 😊

If you don't know what I'm talking about:

Death Note

Black Mirror - Hated in the Nation

I'm not sure how to limit the scope of this discussion, since it touches upon so many areas of morale:

  • the value of life
  • the right to kill
  • vengeance/revenge
  • crime
  • good and evil

So I encourage you to be articulate and to follow some structure: "what(thesis) - why(evidence) - what (thesis)". Other easy to follow variations, such as "why(background + evidence) - what(thesis)" or "what - why - what - by the way(discussion)" or just a simple "what" are of course good too. I'm not trying exclude comments, and I won't, just encouraging an easy to read discussion. As for me:

I would not kill using a Death Note, unless for some utterly personal vendetta. I would also not kill those that did, if we were talking about some sort of society wide phenomenon. I believe that taking action against human life on the macro scale, such as a nation state against another or such as one confined justice system against one of its subjects (state versus an individual, for instance) or in the fictive case of the above mentioned media, is wrong. This is because I don't believe it right to through politics or legislation qualify or quantify the value of a human life, such as is done in jurisdictions that allow capital punishment. While I'm against such "marco actions" on human life, I for some reason have less of a problem empathizing with the individual victims involved, which is to say, I don't think I'd rage against, say, a grieving mother avenging her murdered child by killing the murderer. But then again, not all individuals have the ability or the capacity to exact revenge and maybe they have to rely on their nation state for some kind of restitution? My opinion is probably logical mess, full of contradictions, but there it is. Feel free to poke holes, in a kind manner!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've already thought about all the names of specific leaders and billionaires I'd write down in that book, close it up and go to sleep with a smile on my face.

[-] insanemantis@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Killing is the morally correct thing to do in acts of self defense

Billionaires, just by hoarding the wealth that they have and using it to run this system, are an everyday threat to the lives of the most vulnerable people in society

They are above the law. Nothing will happen to them if I don't do something. That's who I would go for without hesitation

None of that ego bullshit, no Kira nonsense. Just do what has to be done in whatever accidental or coincidental method

[-] jpreston1986@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I mean if I had a magic gun that, when fired, put a bullet into the brain of every trump supporter, I'd empty the clip.

So... yeah, I'd use the death note.

plus on billionaires. hoarding ill-gotten capital while buying politicians to ensure you remain at the top is violence. Dismantling institutions for the poor, crafting an america with income inequality at it's worse since the great depression, 70,000 americans die every year due to lack of access to health care. That is violence, perpetrated against us all, by republicans, and by corporate capitalists. They let you rot and melingure in poverty, dying in shame for having nothing, that's akin to torture. A swift death via death note is almost too kind for them.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago

I would use it. But I wouldn't use it against regular people who are in jail, they are serving their time for their actions.

I would use it against those who have the resources to avoid jail time.

[-] HeHoXa@lemmy.zip 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Then I would use you to kill my business rivals by publicizing convincing but fabricated evidence against them and making it look like they boight their way out of consequences when courts rightly shot the case down.

(For what it's worth, I feel the same and would probably make the same call. Just for the philosophy of it, there are reasonable arguments against the stance.)

[-] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are many people who contribute or cause people's deaths who should have their ability to cause harm removed from society, but who continue to roam free as a result of their disproportionate influence and the corruption of the system (which they often contribute to). Given the lack of alternate means, I would choose to remove them in the most expedient way possible while also minimizing the opportunity for recidivism. I view this as the most utilitarian approach to maximize life, liberty, or even general happiness.

[-] red_tomato@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

I know of some powerful people I would want to write the name of. I’m not sure if it will end the wars and suffering they’ve caused, but I believe the world would be a better place without them.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I would absolutely use it. Billionaires, war criminals, fascists, they'd all be targets.

Once handed the death note, I'd give it a test run on a singular target, with very specific means of death. Just to make sure I'm not wasting my time.

Once it's confirmed as functional, I'd set a date roughly six months in advance. Then I'd hop on Tor and do fuck loads of research for about 5 months, setting the date of death for those billionaires, war criminals, fascists, all for the same day. I'd try to make sure it's a global thing, not just centered within "western" countries.

The world would go into a bit of a panick, as fuck loads of very powerful people would overnight be gone. The status quo of the world wouldn't change too much I wouldn't think, but the rich and powerful would have a wake up call. Some of them would be missed, some of them would have estates going to children. I wouldn't target minors, but adult children who retain that lovecraftian wealth would themselves become targets for round two.

Round two would be significantly harder to implement. The rich and powerful that slipped through the cracks in the first round would be taking big steps to hide their presence. The research to find these traitors of humanity would get significantly harder. But just as before I'd set a date about 6 months out, and do 5 months of adding names with the date.

I'd like to hope that the second round would be the straw that breaks the camel's back, and gets the currently rising tide of fascism to stop, wealth to become unwanted, etc. It will have hopefully established a pattern which makes those with the opportunity to become billionaires, war criminals, or prominent fascists to not go down that path.

Twice a year every year the process would continue, and every year it would get harder and harder to discover targets. But I think it would be the safest way for an individual to use the death note to move the world to the right track.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] missingno@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago

From a strict utilitarian perspective, it's easy to look at this as a trolley problem. I can easily think of a few monsters at the very top whose deaths would definitely save far more lives in exchange.

But the harder question I'd struggle with is, where to stop? I can start with the most obvious targets and feel no remorse, but how long do I keep going down the list for? What would really keep me up at night is wondering what's worse: using it too much or not using it enough?

[-] remon@ani.social 27 points 2 days ago

Oh yes, I'd probably end up with carpal tunnel syndrome from using it too much. Politicians, billionaires, CEOs, celebrities and that guys that parks his huge ass truck in a way that the hood is intruding on the sidewalk.

Also I'd try to do it in funny ways while they are on live-TV when possible, like the priest that got hit by the falling cross.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[-] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Gaia has spoken. Noice.

[-] probable_possum@leminal.space 20 points 2 days ago

I usually go with:

Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.

-- Gandalf when asked about killing Gollum

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

yeah but he stays strangely silent on sauron.

[-] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Being a maia, Sauron cannot be killed, so Gandalf was categorically not talking about Sauron.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

wait! so what happened after the ring was destroyed??? Is sauron still alive! Will he kill me for not capitilizing his name!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

That thing would be full in like, a few hours

[-] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 11 points 2 days ago

I'd make Thanos look like a pacifist.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago

If you asked me this years ago I would have said no. Today though it would seem like such an opportunity to mitigate the effects of climate change and pollution and greed.

[-] wizbiz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

I'd write down every wealthy persons name I could find

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

Kill all the billionaires. No exceptions.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago

I'd simply write 1 entry:

  • Every billionaire. Spontaneous combustion.
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago

No. I'm against death penalty and I extend that to also apply to the people I don't like.

I'm not even going to read the other responses but I'll make an educated guess that this is a minority view here.

[-] missingno@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

I oppose the death penalty because once someone has been caught and sentenced by the justice system, killing them should not be necessary. If they're a violent threat, they can be safely imprisoned. Or if they're only dangerous because of the power they wield, strip them of that power.

But the real question being asked here is about the kinds of people who seem to be above the law and may never be brought to justice through any other means, and are continuing to do active harm for as long as they are free. I would prefer to imprison them or strip them of power nonviolently, but if that's not going to happen...

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] zoltanshields@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Feel like I could just get away with killing people who are like clinically brain dead and can't be allowed to die due to religious or legal reasons.

I can barely be trusted with that, but I feel like that's a limit I could stick to and spend the rest of my time just making sure the book doesn't get into the wrong hands.

There's still moral implications to being an angel of death and it could go wrong really easily but it feels much less tricky than deciding some dude fits my personal criteria of evil and thus deserves death.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

I have thought about if I had a Death Note and the one thing that I would be deeply fascinated by is if it could cause things like people suddenly having Song of Saya style meat vision. If it could do things like that, then I'd probably be a little sadistic by making a few billionaires become "cursed" as a warning from "God" to get rid of their greed by getting rid of their wealth. That's also presuming I would be also allowed to basically plant voices in their heads as well.

[-] CombatWombat@feddit.online 6 points 2 days ago

I have no idea what I would do, but I know it would destroy me, either from guilt due to inaction or guilt due to action.

[-] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

killing the top 1% wealthiest would solve like 99% of issues

load more comments (7 replies)

I feel like I would kind of have to, the potential upside is just way too big

[-] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Yes.

However, in the long run the DeathNote would make me a corrupt PoS. I genuinely believe no one should have such power (DeathNote, Geass, Makima’s Control etc).

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2026
47 points (82.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

41984 readers
1559 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS