695
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by PhoenixDog@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

Because an entire race of Blue Polysexual Mono-Gender females only able to birth other females didn't seem to click very well with the Saudis.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That is the gayest shit I heard men who are homophobic do. ITS A SPECIES OF FEMALE ONLY BEINGS , THAT HAPPEN TO LOOK LIKE SEXY BLUE WOMEN. THEY NEED TO FIND MATES FOR GENETIC CONTRIBUTIONS. In the words of zap branagan "what are ya queer or something?"

[-] Knoxer@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

We live in a world where people with money can buy and do anything as they want without having to deal with any consequences.. shouldn't we do something about it? And I mean 10 years ago at least

[-] LitRomney@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Its insane. Billionaires are ruining absolutely everything and monopolizing everything and turning everything into a propaganda arm for fascism which obviously is exactly what they want (to increase the power and wealth gap between themselves and everyone else). This is why people should be aggressively against censorship because the only way to defeat them is by allowing as many outside voices in as many possible areas as possible without giving the billionaires abilities and tools to silence them.

[-] obvs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Sure.

Stop seeing their money as valuable, and convince others to do the same.

Don't accept money for anything outside of work. Only accept things of value. And when possible, don't offer money for things. Offer things of value, or work, or trades.

Because the money's not actually valuable. They're intentionally devaluing it so that they can be the only ones with enough left to have anything considered wealth.

If the population devalues the currency, that creates all kinds of problems.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 149 points 2 days ago

Why would inclusivity cause offense to any rational person?

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 128 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

See, the problem is that none of these people are rational.

What I can't get over is the idea of "You can do homosexuality in Mass Effect!?" when to have any romantic affair in the game you need to try and do it. If you're against Homosexuality and you are a male Shepard and you have sex with a male NPC, you had to fucking try to have sex with a male NPC. You spent hours seducing him.

Edit: I totally forgot Garrus is the only NPC who doesn't have a homosexual romance option.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 64 points 2 days ago

but we were just very close platonic friends!! And I accidentally hit the buttsex button!

[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

Then its halal.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

"I tripped and fell on my keyboard and mouse and while they were in there they accidentally progressed the dialogue trees that make you have gay sex."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 days ago

To be honest, something like this can actually happen!

In Baldur’s Gate 3, I accidentally had very gay sex with an incubus by selecting a wrong option by mistake…
To be fair, that particular demon could change their sex at will, so maybe it’s not a great comparison.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago

Party members are always throwing themselves at you in Baldur's Gate 3.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

In Lae'zel's case, literally.

Romancing Shadowheart was really difficult. But very rewarding. Out of all the romance options, though, I had the most fun with Karlach's romance plot. It was emotionally healing, especially if you're playing as Wyll.

[-] pory@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Romancing Shadowheart was difficult

Unless you played during launch... Month? Basically any friendship threshold above "hates your guts" (which is easy to achieve because she "Approves" of a lot of no-brainer "good default" options) had Shart wanting to bone you at the earliest possible romance opportunity. I think Gale similarly got patched to be less eager.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ms_lane@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The amount of people that got up in arms about KCD2 having a totally optional gay romance options, that gives you multiple, explicit options to abort (which doesn't happen with some of the hetero flings...) but it was too much for them.

Worse there are ghouls arguing that Boltgun 2 is 'woke' since it has an optional female protagonist.

I certainly hope the pendulum starts swinging back soon, this is all getting out of hand.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Holy shit, there's a boltgun 2? And you can play as a sororitas?? Sign me the fuck up, thank you for mentioning it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] biofaust@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

They are religious people. Why do you call them rational?

[-] OnyxRex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's Saudi Arabia. They're basically in the dark ages with the oil money to buy modern infrastructure. It's an absolute monarchy, You get the death penalty for being any flavor of queer, It's a surveillance state. They literally sent a kill squad into a foreign nation to (successfully) brutally murder a journalist. We don't hear it much because of all the other constant noise in the digital world but they're not good people. Everyone turns a blind eye because they have that sweet sweet oil and since like the 70s the US has been on it's knees for them.

Don't get me wrong here. It's a very nice looking place but it's built on some of the most terrible human rights abuses you can name.

They have almost open slavery. It's not a good place. The fact that they were allowed to buy EA at all is a problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 132 points 2 days ago

Toning down inclusivity offfends me.

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I want more optional homosexual romance in my games, not less!

If these people think Homosexuality is a choice, then let people choose to have a straight relationship or a gay relationship. If they're so hellbent on sexuality being a choice, they'll just intentionally avoid all the homosexual romance options throughout the game, right....?

Right...?

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

Do you have a shitload of money? Then they don't care.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nadram@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Man EA is a given to boycott. No peer-pressure or 10/10 reviews is going to change that for me. Since the days of the endless yearly sports games in the 90s it was clear they're c🤘nts

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago

No alcohol. No exposed ankles. No gays.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Is it ok to dismember journalists while they're still alive though?

[-] pory@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hilariously, one of the parts of Mass Effect that hasn't aged super well is a running joke across all three games where you (a decorated military figure) can punch out a news reporter for trying to make you look bad on the news. To the point where if you do it in 1 and 2, she dodges in 3 but you can react to a prompt to headbutt her and walk away with her slumped against a wall.

The paragon options for dealing with her include responding to her goading question about military losses caused by your decision by being a good brave little soldier and listing the names of the ships lost in the action.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Ok sure, but beating the reporter is the bad option in those scenes, just to be clear.

[-] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago

Only if you keep the dismembered ankles covered up.

[-] LitRomney@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

natural allies of western civilization somehow

[-] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

No smoking, no swearing and no ALIEN SEX!

[-] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 75 points 2 days ago

I think its for the best that it was cancelled. The first two Mass Effect games are some of my favourites and I would rather have no new game in the series than whatever EA would produce today.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 35 points 2 days ago

But we're missing out on an alien race of traders that will only accept Mass Effect Funbucks, and sell you a range of cosmetic items that change weekly!

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I loved Mass Effect 3's multi-player despite expecting it to be horrible, but it was also the first game I really enjoyed that had such horrid lootbox mechanics.

ME3's single-player was a masterpiece until the last hour. I didn't even necessarily hate the endings. I just hated that in the end no matter what had happened, it came down to "pick the ending". I would have been much more satisfied if your actions throughout the trilogy had determined the ending you got - especially since they had done so much tying together loose ends from the previous games.

I loved that you could actually save both the Geth and the Quarians, but only if you'd made the correct decisions in Mass Effect 2 AND 3. That same kind of logic could have been used to pick the ending.

[-] Linken@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Isn't this exactly the kind of thing conservatives were always worried about happening to them?

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 2 days ago

Projection is a psychological defense mechanism that involves attributing one’s undesirable traits, feelings, or impulses to other people.

https://www.simplypsychology.org/psychological-projection-defense-mechanism.html

[-] Goforce5@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Its always projection

[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 18 points 2 days ago

Well, I doubt most reasonable people strictly needed more reasons to want EA and everything associated with it to stop existing, but here is one anyway.

[-] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Don't offend the people you're including

[-] TheMadIrishman@sh.itjust.works 58 points 2 days ago

But, I WANT offense. I WANT those people uncomfortable. So let’s do more not less, kthx.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Offense to whom? Just like in real life, you can reject advances from those you aren’t interested in…

[-] MrMobius@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 days ago

Reminds me of the Wukong scandal where the devs forbade sponsored influencers to talk about feminism among other "too political" subjects.

This really puts me off purchasing a game from people capable of that kind of censorship.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 9 points 2 days ago

You don't fucking say

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
695 points (98.7% liked)

Games

51531 readers
792 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS