Can someone explain to an outsider why this guy kept getting heralded as the next great Democrat leader? Every single thing I've read about him has been "Newsom deploys extra orphan crushing machines" and other nakedly Republican policies. Does he just have a huge bot farm working for him or something?
Because he meme’d back at trump.
That’s all.
He's good at trash-talking Trump, that's all I see good about him.
Cause he wants it so bad and he’s been auditioning for it for awhile
He is charismatic and good looking and not poor or middle class, he makes richer, older people (ie. voters) feel good about themselves, and is a Democrat in California.
None of those things are indicators of any kind of ethics or morality, but are all you need to become a politician.
Fuck this guy.
If he joined Trumps cabinet tomorrow I would not be surprised in the least.
He is at the head of the Donorcrat party, because that lets him have a sustainable career. The Turdpublicans are the roman candle of conservative politics, burning brightly and burnt out swiftly.
He basically wants to do this for the rest of his life:

And there are still people thinking this corrupt asshole would be a good US President.
he was gaining unnatural amount of msm boosting. noticed how he stopped railing on trump after a few months, it was hurting him, but his billionaire donors told him to stop.
he's really cashing out at the end of his career isnt he. What a traitorous arsehole. People like him are why the democratic party is on the rocks.
He may call himself a democrat but he's a republican on the inside.
As are most of them these days.
It's not the end. I'd eat a random street hat if he doesn't run for president. Pretty sure ego and ambition are secreted from his scalp and create his natural hair gel.
Yep. I'm prepared to fight like hell in the primary, if we get one, to make sure he doesn't make it on the ballot. If we don't topple establishment leadership at the DNC this election though, they will force Newsom through regardless of what the primary shows, like with Bernie. The bigger fight is now.
Who would you like to see as the candidate in 2028? A lot of people like AOC but I'm not sure she runs in '28.
I think it's too soon for her, I think she should take Chuck's Senate seat first, then run later. I don't know who, I feel like you can't trust anybody these days. If no one better is nominatted, she might have to run now, rather than later.
Kimberly Guilfoyle’s ex is a piece of shit too? Surprised it didn’t work out between them.
I wish he was at the end of his career, but establishment shitheads keep pushing him like the reactionaries they are
He’s been a sleeve ball his whole career. Fucking that guy
I'm never fucking voting for this man. Look at me neolibs, never. If you want to lose the next election pick this fucker. It'll be your fucking choice.
He really doesn't give a shit about pretending anymore. He knows his patrons have already financed his DNC nomination.
sadly he was the only choice in cali or a republican. and there will be another corporate stooge becoming the governer again.
Nice try couch fucker
Just another corpo cuck who grandstands about "the good fight" or whatever on socials
So, he basically signs a bunch of new laws protecting private data, but because he did not sign one particular proposition, evil incarnate? People realize that this "vetoed" law is not one that existed, but a proposition for a law ... right? You should still have control of how your data is shared.
It's not ideal, but seriously, man it's so easy to make people on Lemmy shoot themselves on the foot. People here will jump at anything to demonize if you even think of voting against Trump here even though he clearly is literally open corruption and the complete corrosion of the rule of law. Anything that diverts from the complete ideal is an excuse for the most corrupt administration to continue in power.
Based on what we know currently it is unlikely he is going to be running against Trump. Though not impossible he is running against a Trump proxy/someone who will later pull some maneuvers to get Trump the presidency again. And I guess the tiniest chance Trump directly runs again.
Newsom, in his veto letter to the legislature, said he was supportive of “protecting sensitive personal information of Californians,” but that a “categorical ban on sharing that information goes a step too far.”
The governor pointed to existing state laws that require businesses to give consumers the option to limit sharing their information and budget constraints that would hinder implementing and enforcing the law.
Newsom also signed a handful of other bills strengthening the state’s privacy rules:
- SB 923 expands the scope of the California Consumer Privacy Act to require businesses to delete all personal information they have on a consumer upon request, not just data collected directly from the consumer. Online-only businesses will be required to provide a webform or portal for deletion requests.
- AB 883 shortens the time with which data brokers must comply with a data deletion request from 45 to 30 days. It requires elected officials and judges receive information on how to access the deletion mechanism, known as DROP, to protect their information.
Other data privacy laws still awaiting Newsom’s signature or veto include:
- SB 690 would remove the private right to action for alleged violations under a wiretapping law, allowing just the state attorney general to pursue such legal challenges.
- AB 2561 would prohibit an operating system or application from re-adjusting a user’s privacy setting without consent.
So they now must delete data when requested. Except if they SOLD THAT DATA then it can’t be deleted because it’s already out there. 30 days is fucking plenty of time.
Fucking slimey piece of shit.
but that a “categorical ban on sharing that information goes a step too far.”
Why?
Not as bad as a Republican can still be reay fucking bad.
Scumbag, loser, pathetic.
Gruesome Newsom strikes again
Scum
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.