1114
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] bender223@lemmy.today 11 points 1 hour ago

why do these so called captains of industry always sound like whiny little bitches? if they're so smart, come up with a better solution

[-] lemmingsareawesome@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

ai is loading the salution to everything trust me bro jst wait

and maybe give it ur tax dollars and ram and water lol

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 hour ago

Sam Altman has lost the plot.

His own model of LLM isn't sustainable or profitable, where the local software model us.

And the economy isn't there just to make Sam Altman richer.

This is (another) Let them eat cake moment in which another spoiled aristocrat has lost touch with the common people.

[-] coredev@programming.dev 2 points 32 minutes ago

O gooddie a new little fascist boy. Who could have guessed.

[-] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 4 points 55 minutes ago

On contrary, we should run all our models locally.

[-] eicker@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago

Absolutely! 💯

[-] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 41 points 3 hours ago

I hate the idea of Sam Altman not being in prison

[-] DillDough@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 hour ago

Why should we continue allowing him to drain us like the parasite he is? He's okay with ending our species if he's able to generate the most capital and control of any organization in history, why is it so unacceptable that we simply end him instead?

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 18 points 3 hours ago

The problem isn't the AI, the issue is that the elites are trying to horde it and keep it from us little people. If we are to have agency, having personal ownership over local AI, collectively owned AI, and regulations, are all key to ensuring that democracy and egalitarianism is secure.

The elite will not willingly surrender power, especially there is a void that they can colonize. Ordinary people like us should fill the vacuum, to deny the elite from having total control over AI.

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 26 points 3 hours ago

So we'd own a basic terminal, and pay a subscription for our computing needs.

Gosh, who'd'a thunkit? Never saw that one coming.

[-] MrShankles@reddthat.com 7 points 1 hour ago

Especially not when he said how he envisions ai to someday be a utility like water or electricity, that everyone will pay for

Shocked, I tell you. I'm utterly shocked

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

So we'd own a basic terminal, and pay a subscription for our computing needs.

No.

We would rent a proprietary terminal that also needs a paid subscription to a computing service.

[-] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 hours ago

“In this supply-constrained environment, efficiency of centralized control only makes sense!”

“For whom? Also, why is the supply constrained in the first place?”

“Well, we used hype from central bank-level investors to lend us enough to buy up all the supply. We have sooo much debt that we need every penny of efficiency we can get.”

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

“In this supply-constrained environment, efficiency of centralized control only makes sense!”

“For whom?

Makes (financial) sense for the central controller's business model to succeed.

[-] gothmog@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago

But do you think it's a WISE idea?

[-] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

You mean a Wyze idea? 😉

[-] gothmog@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

Actually we both got it wrong. Its Wyse

[-] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Little bitch gnome wants to prevent your digital ai sovereignty

[-] SplitTheUSInFour@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Nope. We're slamming out our software, canceling our accounts, and running things ourselves. Requires a lot less electricity and works faster. Efficiency is king in business. You sir, are inefficient and no one enjoys giving you their money.

This idiot never learned the golden rule: everybody is using everybody. Even him. It's within the customers right to do this themselves. Don't play the game if you can't handle the rules.

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

Most people don't understand just how little compute they actually need to run their lives, a few basic self hosted apps on a 10+ year old laptop sitting in your closet can replace at least 85% of your dependency on big tech. You get a better experience, and your data doesn't ever leave your house.

[-] Luna1020@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago

I just read an article yesterday about a young woman who passed away after following the advice of an AI to stop taking her medication. I simply don’t understand why these capitalists are always so intent on monopolizing the market and controlling people. Are they truly so foolish that they always assume they’re right about everything—as if they were omnipotent?

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago)

The woman explicitly ignored her doctors though. It's unfortunate and I think that model was flawed but it's still a brain dead thing to do. At some point the benefits of helping millions outweigh some rare decisions and I'm not a corporate AI shill, an open source model would be just as susceptible to this scenario.

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I simply don’t understand why these capitalists are always so intent on monopolizing the market and controlling people.

Power and money. They're real life super villains. It's why most people run for politics or become cops. Some want to make the world better, most just want to control others because they've lacked any kind of control at home or through their lives.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Yes, they assume because they have money they are doing everything right and must be the smartest people around. Even average people equate money with intelligence for some reason. It's insane because the majority of people with lots of money inherited it. It's almost impossible to become rich using just intelligence and hard work though. You always have to exploit people and be unethical in some way

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

where is a Mario brother when you need one

[-] berno@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Fuck this guy what a total freak

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Murderous AI should practice on Sam Altman.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Agentic LLMs haven't yet killed anyone, though Anthropic Fable has attempted extortion. OpenAI and Anthopic, the privately owned public benefit corporations, are another story, and while I can't cite examples, I suspect their dedicated data centers are shortening the lifespans of their human neighbors.

It would not surprise me if either of them hired PMCs or PSCs to do their wetwork for them.

[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 18 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah with open models catching up and giving reasonable results in consumer grade setups, they are gonna go full on with "unregulated AI is too dangerous we should only allow hardware gated LLMs".

It is so funny this guy is the CEO of a company called openAI lol.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

And that sentiment will come from the same people that just removed reverse-engineering from the common folk, reserving that power for specific companies and government entities. https://tbreak.com/claude-opus-5-5-reverse-engineering-restricted/

[-] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

So is he gonna redistribute his wealth? Cause ya know? Wealth hoarding is terrible and the people hoarding wealth (Sam Altman) should have to redistribute their wealth because that money could be better used to serve the people, right? In fact all billionaires and trillionaires should be engaging in wealth redistribution, right?

If we're gonna agree from a general consensus agreement POV why not make him give us his money because I mean if people owning computers is hurting the worldwide Ai industry, then clearly the wealth hoarding hurting the global economy can be solved simply by someone telling others to engage in redistribution, right?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 hours ago

The best thing for all of us is to have him in charge of our lives. Sign me up, dickbag.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Who are the people behind the curtains funding these losers? WTF, one cannot be an AI hobbyists.

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago

Well, I absolutely hate the idea of that fuckong gnome consuming the oxygen of this planet. He should just stop using it. Just sayin'

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

subscription models are a scam.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago

"We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity, and people buy it from us on a meter,” - Sam Altman

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Sci-fi has been warning us about exactly this type of maglomaniac and the future they want to control for as long as I can remember.

[-] SlayersFan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I mean I was waiting to see how shitty the apple tv neuromancer adaptation would be next year, but at this rate, I wouldn't be surprised if we end up pushing random Timmys into becoming techies and netrunners. Life imitates art I guess.

[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They just have no concept of people learning and growing they want us all to sit there lobotomized consuming their garbage

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2026
1114 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

89269 readers
4376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS