63
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 2 points 12 hours ago

This document contains a lot of great stuff. I have a tremendous level of respect, both personal and professional, for Amazon's Principal Engineering community; I'm led to understand that that respect may not be reciprocated, but that's okay. I am, by their standards, a lapsed engineer who ran away to join the circus as one of its lesser clowns.

was there really a need to grovel

[-] rhamph@awful.systems 27 points 1 day ago

There's a ridiculously simple test you can use to figure out whether AI mandates at a given company are well-considered, or are being shoved out the door by out-of-touch buffoons: What happens when an engineer documents that AI made a task worse? Are they taken seriously, or are they marginalized and eventually managed out?

Even easier test: is it an AI mandate?

[-] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 5 points 1 day ago

If AI makes a task easier i find that engineers will use it. Engineers are lazy. We want to automate stuff so ee dont have to do it.

[-] schnoopy@awful.systems 3 points 9 hours ago

Engineers are a formally certified thing, you don't get to call yourself an engineer because you make digital machines.

One of the certification requirements is ethical standards and education.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 2 points 20 hours ago

you're the kind of programmer your colleagues hate having to deal with

[-] dandi8@fedia.io 1 points 20 hours ago

This article reads like it was AI generated.

[-] ebu@awful.systems 1 points 16 hours ago
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2026
63 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2773 readers
406 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS