https://ivehaditpodcast.com/ - in case one were curious, here's the link.
couple of interesting points:
- no idea what this podcast is, so this "backlash" is actually promoting the podcast
- maybe confirmation bias on my part, but it seems like this sort of bullshit backlash is towards women for the most part
- they should definitely dig him up and do it again
- they didnt even write the joke, just laughed at it, definitely some manufactured outrage
In 2026 this is literally how you advertise a political podcast.
Podcast is I've Had It, run by Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan. Known for being left wing and supporting Hasan Piker and Kyle Kulinski.
They're reasonably large. Enough to cross over with other really big left leaning podcasts. Also I'm kind of surprised anyone who would fret about a conservative backlash would advertise on it. I feel like they've called conservatives just straight out evil before. They're not like, leftist, but they're not sanitized centrism. What did Chewy think they were getting themselves into?
Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan read social media posts reacting to Tuesday’s midterm election — in which Democrats took control of the House and Senate and won key governors’ races — on Thursday’s episode of their I’ve Had It podcast.
They both cracked up to a post that read, “We’re digging up Charlie Kirk and doing it again.”
The clip has since been cut from the episode, and the two apologized for laughing at the joke. But the damage has already been done.
They didn't even make a joke, they just laughed at one?
Conservatives: The left hates comedy and are snowflakes, and also don't you dare laugh at the mere implication of something that upsets us.
I saw it. And I laughed at it. Because it was funny.
Fuck Charlie Kirk, and these butthurt GOP hypocrites who regularly spew hate and bile and vitriol every time they open their mouths. They can dish it out, but they sure can’t take it.
edit: here is their response:
I didn't watch this, but saw someone (one of the night show hosts) bring up how conservative podcasters kept bringing up that post made by an anonymous twitter account with an anime profile pic...
People laughed at how ridiculous it was, and the only reason anyone saw it, was Republicans bitching about it.
Actually it might have been that podcast that Cody Johnson from oldschool Cracked that I saw it.
Either way, the original tweet was something rightwingers latched onto immediately, it's just a dumb twitter joke, literally what the right said was totally cool and Elon explicitly said was why he bought twitter, "to make comedy legal"
Always rely on crowdfunding over sponsors
fuck kirk
I generally don't approve of necrophilia, but on the other hand, I am kind of curious what it would feel like to fuck a neck-hole...
Charlie Kirk said worse things
“Whatever our political differences, there is nothing funny about gun violence. We’ve long supported common-sense gun safety reform,” the hosts said. “To that end, we’ve made a donation to Everytown for Gun Safety, the largest gun violence prevention organization in America. We’ll keep using our platforms to fight for the safety of all Americans.”
I will say, this donation is a much funnier joke than the one that got their sponsers pissed. Kirk thought regular deaths were just the tragic consequence we face for our freedoms. He was specifically against gun restrictions.
The team has also successfully defended and helped defend many state and local gun safety laws against Second Amendment and preemption challenges.
It's really insensitive of them to spit on Kirk's grave by opposing his life's work in support of gun violence. It's the very last cause he supported and that deserves some respect.
The pod cast is "I've had it"
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News