19
submitted 3 hours ago by xc2215x@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 7 points 1 hour ago

https://ivehaditpodcast.com/ - in case one were curious, here's the link.

[-] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

couple of interesting points:

  1. no idea what this podcast is, so this "backlash" is actually promoting the podcast
  2. maybe confirmation bias on my part, but it seems like this sort of bullshit backlash is towards women for the most part
  3. they should definitely dig him up and do it again
  4. they didnt even write the joke, just laughed at it, definitely some manufactured outrage
[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 hour ago

In 2026 this is literally how you advertise a political podcast.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Podcast is I've Had It, run by Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan. Known for being left wing and supporting Hasan Piker and Kyle Kulinski.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 37 minutes ago

They're reasonably large. Enough to cross over with other really big left leaning podcasts. Also I'm kind of surprised anyone who would fret about a conservative backlash would advertise on it. I feel like they've called conservatives just straight out evil before. They're not like, leftist, but they're not sanitized centrism. What did Chewy think they were getting themselves into?

[-] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 28 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan read social media posts reacting to Tuesday’s midterm election — in which Democrats took control of the House and Senate and won key governors’ races — on Thursday’s episode of their I’ve Had It podcast.

They both cracked up to a post that read, “We’re digging up Charlie Kirk and doing it again.”

The clip has since been cut from the episode, and the two apologized for laughing at the joke. But the damage has already been done.

They didn't even make a joke, they just laughed at one?

Conservatives: The left hates comedy and are snowflakes, and also don't you dare laugh at the mere implication of something that upsets us.

[-] cruseo@piefed.world 12 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I saw it. And I laughed at it. Because it was funny.

Fuck Charlie Kirk, and these butthurt GOP hypocrites who regularly spew hate and bile and vitriol every time they open their mouths. They can dish it out, but they sure can’t take it.

edit: here is their response:

https://youtu.be/VNZ__YWT0uU

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

I didn't watch this, but saw someone (one of the night show hosts) bring up how conservative podcasters kept bringing up that post made by an anonymous twitter account with an anime profile pic...

People laughed at how ridiculous it was, and the only reason anyone saw it, was Republicans bitching about it.

Actually it might have been that podcast that Cody Johnson from oldschool Cracked that I saw it.

Either way, the original tweet was something rightwingers latched onto immediately, it's just a dumb twitter joke, literally what the right said was totally cool and Elon explicitly said was why he bought twitter, "to make comedy legal"

[-] rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 hours ago

Always rely on crowdfunding over sponsors

[-] dektep@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago
[-] 2ndDegreeOWO@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

I generally don't approve of necrophilia, but on the other hand, I am kind of curious what it would feel like to fuck a neck-hole...

[-] crandall@lemmy.today 18 points 2 hours ago

Charlie Kirk said worse things

[-] celeste@kbin.earth 23 points 3 hours ago

“Whatever our political differences, there is nothing funny about gun violence. We’ve long supported common-sense gun safety reform,” the hosts said. “To that end, we’ve made a donation to Everytown for Gun Safety, the largest gun violence prevention organization in America. We’ll keep using our platforms to fight for the safety of all Americans.”

I will say, this donation is a much funnier joke than the one that got their sponsers pissed. Kirk thought regular deaths were just the tragic consequence we face for our freedoms. He was specifically against gun restrictions.

https://everytownlaw.org/

The team has also successfully defended and helped defend many state and local gun safety laws against Second Amendment and preemption challenges.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 25 minutes ago

It's really insensitive of them to spit on Kirk's grave by opposing his life's work in support of gun violence. It's the very last cause he supported and that deserves some respect.

[-] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

The pod cast is "I've had it"

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
19 points (82.8% liked)

politics

31810 readers
5495 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS