this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
71 points (94.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9669 readers
23 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am new to FuckCars, and personally, I feel very much aligned to this ideology. Particularly, the amout of environmental damage the fuel consumption causes, concerns me.

However, sometimes, I feel like I am a hypocrite, because I drive a motorcycle, which again, causes pollution. But, in my defense, I always try to use my bicycle if I can, and use my motorbike only when necessary, because public transportation system isn't great in my city. Also, the amount of pollutants my bike releases is way less when compared to a car, or even a small hatchback.

The bike in question is only 160cc, and does 30-40 km/litre (~18-25 miles/litre).

So, what is your opinion on all this, and how can I improve my situation?

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 51 points 8 months ago

I think that sound pollution regulations should be enrforced fiercely.
Want to drive around on a motorcycle? Go right ahead. Want to mod the exhaust and create a multi km wide disturbance? Get your license revoked, get your vehicle taken away, get a mandatory rehabilitation course and community service.
I don't understand why we tolerate the morons that think it's okay to just straight up blast deafening noise at everyone and everything they happen to pass by

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There was a study that "found that if 10 percent of all private cars were replaced by motorcycles in the traffic flow of the test area, total time losses for all vehicles decreased by 40 percent and total emissions reduced by 6 percent (1 percent from the different traffic composition of more emission-reduced motorcycles and 5 percent from avoided traffic congestion). A 25 percent modal shift from cars to motorcycles was found to eliminate congestion entirely."

It's way better than a car for most situations. I commuted on a motorcycle for over a decade. I was in California where lane splitting and filtering is legal, which made traffic almost disappear from my perspective.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Your comment ignores the safety problems, but otherwise good info.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

I suspect the safety problem is mainly a car problem.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's all or something, not all or nothing. You do the best you can. Use as much public transport or eco-friendly modes of transport. Walk, if you cant walk, bike/scoot, if you cant bike or scoot, bus/tram, if not that, motorcycle.

You get the idea, sounds like you're already approaching this the right way, doing what you can. Be safe, driving motorcycles is dangerous, especially in the US.

[–] homoludens@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago

And fight for political change.

[–] Jomn@jlai.lu 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They usually are much noisier than cars which can be very annoying. But a big part of it is due to the type of people who ride them in my city, they usually really don't care about others.

But if the motorbike is chosen and used correctly, they are better than most cars.

[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

There's definitely a tier list, and motorcycles are overall better imo. They're smaller and generally get better gas mileage. I can't say for certain, but if I had to guess people driving a motorcycle are also paying more attention to the road and less likely to hit pedestrians.

My biggest complaint with them is the noise and the emissions. Ideally they will be replaced by electric alternatives in the future and that will resolve both issues.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 21 points 8 months ago

It's less pollution but you'd never see me on one in America. I used to be a daily rider in college and shit was so incredibly dangerous. Americans drive with abandon and cars are so huge now even with $1k+ in gear you won't really be safe. I'll take surviving an accident over a small change to emissions and size. You still need a space to park most of the time unless you want to flirt with tickets and curb parking.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago
  1. Don't feel bad for using motorized vehicles, be it a car or a motorcycle. Do what is the most you can do personally. Of course, if you're one of those big truck ppl then u'r a problem. Unfortunately, we don't have infrastructure suitable for non motorized vehicles everywhere. Shifting the blame from governments to individuals in this case is comparable to the individual carbon footprint bs.
  2. While motorcycles are much better than cars, they're still bad. They cause air and sound pollution. Because of their ability to go higher speeds, they make cities unsafe for pedestrians and bicyclists (basically humans). Essentially, they do all the bad things that cars do, but just with a lower magnitude.
[–] hips_and_nips@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

While the pollutant volume is smaller, the exhaust is typically worse that a car/truck: https://gearjunkie.com/motors/motorcycle-vs-vehicle-emissions

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I only barely survived an unavoidable and unpredictable crash on a road bicycle with 2 cars. I've had 6 crashes with 7 cars in 170k miles on the bike since 2009. Only 2 of those crashes were bad. However I only barely survived crashing at 30mph where the weight of the bike was insignificant. I wouldn't have survived that same crash on anything more significant or at any higher speed. I had the critical damage of C1 and a fracture at the base of my skull. I was told if I hadn't been knocked out completely, I would have died if I had moved before the swelling could keep everything together.

I wouldn't recommend motorcycles until humans decide to replace driver's side airbag covers with daggers. People drive like fools and since their incompetence is nonlethal to them, the culture of incompetence is unavoidable.

You likely think you can avoid anything by just being careful. This is not the case. I was ultra cautious and went out of my way to avoid hazardous areas. Most of my hits were from illegal U-turns. If you can predict a random vehicle parallel parked on the side of the road will try and make an illegal U-turn suddenly without warning, directly in front of a large SUV that is passing them, you can avoid the crash that almost killed me. That is the level of stupid that finally got me even on a road bicycle.

The human body is not capable of handling the forces of collision. It doesn't matter what kind of armored jacket you wear, it will never compare to a car's tolerance. I've seen a lot of people die on bicycles including 3 people I knew. My cousin died on a motorcycle last month.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Man everything you wrote here sucks and I'm sorry you've had to experience all that. Riding isn't a "if" you crash, its a "when" you crash thing.

Even still, I find it preferable to being in a box isolated from the environment. Then it's just more detached television. Being a part of the environment helps me feel alive.

[–] rudyharrelson@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Glad you made it out relatively unscathed. My old man got killed when a negligent driver crashed into him while he was riding his bike at night. Motorcycles are death traps and I'm always uncomfortable when I'm on the road and one gets near my car.

I like that they're more fuel efficient than cars, and they're a thrill for the rider, but the inevitable incompetence of other drivers, or just plain bad luck like blowing a tire, has such a high mortality rate for bikers.

One of my dad's old biker buddies got hit by a teenage driver who'd just gotten their license. I'm not gonna harp on the kid too badly cause when you're a new driver, you're gonna make mistakes. Just sucks that one little mistake can cost someone so dearly. Dad's friend survived, but he's never been the same due to brain damage sustained in the crash. He wasn't wearing a DoT approved helmet at the time, though, so it's partially on him. His fake helmet snapped in half like a twig.

Biker culture (at least in the US) also has the unfortunate undercurrent of macho shit like "I don't wanna wear a helmet cause that's for sissies. I'll just die like a man." Helmets are mandatory in my state, but it's seldom enforced.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

Biker culture (at least in the US) also has the unfortunate undercurrent of macho shit like “I don’t wanna wear a helmet cause that’s for sissies. I’ll just die like a man.”

This is parts extra odd to me because the heavy leather jackets and clothing that are also part of that same culture are actually meant to be a form of light armor should you find yourself in a crash

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Grandpa told me: if you ride it isn't if you have a crash, but when and how bad

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Better than a car, worse than a bike.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Better than cars for sure. An electric bike is even better.

[–] atmur@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Better than ICE cars. Way more efficient and doesn't take up as much space on the road. As long as it's not one of those deafeningly loud ones, I wouldn't worry about it. If you're using your bicycle when you can, you're already doing more than most people. If money's no object, you could get an EV motorcycle, but don't feel like you need to change. I am personally in the same boat as Neato though, I'd never ride one in the US, but that doesn't really matter for your question.

Personally, I live in suburban hell. Public transit sucks here, there's nothing in walking distance, and incredibly narrow bike lines (if any at all) to get anywhere useful. I switched to an EV (car) because there's literally no other way to commute where I live.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Better than ICE cars. Way more efficient

Not necessarily.

Just compare fuel consumption figures, and bizarrely a small car can consume less fuel than a relatively modest bike. Especially if you factor in hybrids or diesels.

And that's for a car that hopefully transports passengers at least some of the time.

Obviously, I am talking as someone who lives in Europe. While I assume they still sell plenty of small, underpowered and very efficient cars in Asia, I suspect there's less market for those in the Americas.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 months ago

I think overall they are better than cars but still have issues. They are smaller and less dangerous to other people (though far more dangerous to you). However, many models can be quite polluting in spite of their fuel efficiency because of lesser emissions controls. And they are often extremely loud. This one makes me the most angry because lots of riders tend to be really dismissive of the real harm that their noise imposes on the community.

But if your motorcycle is clean and quiet then I think it’s relatively fine. Even if it’s not, an awareness of the harms you are causing and active efforts to minimize them and transition to other modes of transit is all we ask. I still drive a car when I need to. It may not be the maximally ethical decision but I think some people underestimate the difficulty of the total transformation our society will need to undergo. I applaud anyone who is taking large and serious steps in the right direction even if they are not all the way there yet.

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I had scooters, powerful scooters, motorcycles and very powerful motorcycles.

In the end I gave up that noise of transport

I love the front when being on two wheels, but there's no way I can continue doing that in America.

Its just ridiculously dangerous with the way drivers in the US are

[–] superweeniehutjrs@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I am in a city where a car is almost mandatory. I can still push for change, while having to drive daily to pay the bills and such. I think your thinking is logical for your situation. Similarly, I chose what is, to me, the least bad option - a small, affordable EV. Over 50% of the time I have a passenger. I try to work from home. I charge on my home solar as much as I can. Fuck cars. Fuck unsafe drivers

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

I bought an Ebike so I can drive my car less

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

They should be more common since they're smaller and lighter, especially for individual travel when public transport or bicycles aren't feasible. However, as everyone who rides one knows, it's drivers that make them dangerous.

With larger electric bicycles overlapping with scooters for city travel they really have so much potential.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I love the concept. Cutting down on all the unnecessary extra weight of a car when most trips are single passenger anyway.

But most customers and manufacturers see them a lot differently. Meant for thrill seekers, speed chasers, and projecting more obnoxious masculinity. They need to be loud, smoky, and dangerously fast. They should have been first in line for electrification but instead they're lagging behind cars.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They should have been first in line for electrification but instead they're lagging behind cars.

Depends on where you live. Asia and Europe there are plenty, although they're often scooters or slower speed bikes. Not that you need much more in an urban environment.

There's also the whole electric bike thing. Depending on where you live, at least some electric bikes are actually closer to motorbikes. And if they're not, the electric bike is often subject to less stringent legislation and regulation than an electric motorbike. That can mean the difference between having to get a license or not.

e: relevant FortNine video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2zlYpy6QCM

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

It may have changed but my understanding is emissions regulations on motorcycles tends to be much more lax than in cars.

Engine size often time changing the emissions standards, smaller engines often having less requirements.

From that perspective motorcycles are worse.

From the perspective of mass transit being the best option, motorcycles are worse.

Motorcycles fill the same role as cars, just less efficiently (saving on size).

The fossil fuel motor is the primary issue.

[–] Copperhead@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

I currently own and use my fully electric Zero SR motorcycle for daily commuting. It's obviously much quieter and somewhat cleaner than a traditional ICE motorcycle but I would think motorcycles in general are cleaner than traditional vehicles (SUVs, Pickup Trucks, etc.). Just like any motorized vehicle however, you still deal with brake dust, tire dust/shavings, emissions, and other vehicle waste (like tire disposal or motor oil disposal) but on a smaller scale I think.

I reside in the US, specifically in a southeastern state, where public transportation as well as pedestrian infrastructure is absolutely abysmal and/or non-existent, in my opinion. I try to make the best of the situation by limiting my method of travel to my electric motorcycle where possible. I would prefer to walk to places if I could, but in most cases, I just think it isn't feasible or safe where I reside due to the vehicle-centric civil design of where I reside.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago

Imagine this in your city.

Manila