But surely anyone's nose will appear more hooked when widely grinning like that because it'll slightly raise the points where your nose attaches to your face.
Most of the people explaining this still make it more complicated than it needs to be, imo.
I just think the symbol "%" algebraically means 0.01
I just read through your history...
Cringe behaviour. Touch grass
Well obviously the most moral thing would be to live in it themselves or give it away to someone who actually wants to live in it. I accept that practically nobody is gonna be virtuous enough to just give away a free apartment to a homeless person, but selling it for a (at least somewhat) reasonable price is probably what I'd realistically do (assuming no close friend or family member wanted it).
Renting it out is still inherently exploiting the person living there.
Also consider that no "good person" simply owns a residential property that they don't live in.
I know I'm not who you're replying to and other people might disagree with parts of this, but can anyone seriously not agree that all landlords are scum?
I don't think many people are gonna have "hot takes" based on a vaguely titled article behind a paywall.
Also "scandals" to do with the Chinese military have little to do with someone saying that Taiwanese military badges don't prove anything about the situation in China.
Delta accomplishes this pricing through a partnership with Fetcherr, a six-year-old Israeli company that also counts Azul, WestJet, Virgin Atlantic, and VivaAerobus as clients. And it has its sights set beyond flying. “Once we will be established in the airline industry, we will move to hospitality, car rentals, cruises, whatever,” cofounder Robby Nissan said at a travel conference in 2022.
So soon even more AI will decide you have to pay more, and that extra money will be going to Israel, no doubt helping to fund their genocide
"Hard truth realized as a CEO"
I'm in this picture kinda (i have been castrated) 😔
Just because it's low compared to other CEOs doesn't make it reasonable and justified. Also, Wikipedia isn't a "high-profile firm". It's (at least supposed to be) a non-profit that takes donations to keep the site running and free.
That seems like a completely nihilistic and empty view of politics. What do you even actually think a society that isn't "corrupt" (or at least is less corrupt) could look like? How can you blame the people with no power at all just as much as the president?
Blaming everyone for everything is basically the same as blaming nobody for anything.
It's fine to think that the vast majority of people believe in propaganda or are worried about things that don't matter.
My main problem really is with you saying "any talk of politics is pointless". It's just complete doomerism.
Not necessarily. The windows could be a requirement for the car moving, but not sufficient on their own. Maybe the car moves because it has both windows and an engine, but it wouldn't move if either the engine was removed or all the windows were.