Guess it's nice I run graphene and can just block that, man that sucks though. I'm tired of Mozilla being only slightly better than the competition

...right...I can't view this meme LMAO...I don't have IPv4 on my network 🤣

That would be nice but I do wonder how much the Graphene project is going to be involved in hardware decisions if it is a major OEM. Sounds like it'll be more just a phone where the OEM provides support of bootloader unlocks and installation of graphene

The reason for initramfs is because if you build your block or filesystem drivers as modules the kernel can't boot without loading the modules and can't load the modules without said modules and therefore causing a chicken and egg problem. Reading a folder without all necessary boot drivers just isn't possible. That's why the bootloader is responsible for loading initramfs into system memory, the kernel can read it with 0 drivers required. Getting rid of it can be done but ALL of your boot drivers need to be statically linked into the kernel image so that the kernel doesn't need any modules to get the rootfs mounted. Ironically EFI can be used to obsolete initramfs in theory since the kernel can read data from the ESP without any drivers being required so putting modules in a folder on the ESP would work for EFI enabled systems

This isn't a rust issue...this is a canonical using a less than ideal license issue on their rust code.

You aren't though. In most languages that use the latter declaration you would prefix the declaration with final or const or the like to specify it won't be updated.

But it's still not a guarantee

Let's not forget the sending unity search results to Amazon fiasco

Is a crash "completion"? If that's what we call complete that makes my life a lot easier on some projects 😅

While you aren't wrong I think you're kinda missing the spirit of the joke.

How are fedora or SUSE valid alternatives "from the same repos"? They're not even based on Debian or Debian repos?

From a development perspective it certainly sounds easier to have one global timezone with DST than a bunch of smaller ones without it. Would that make sense in reality? Probably not but I definitely think timezones take more work to compensate for properly.