Liquid assets
Tomorrow_Farewell
Incorrect. Most of Eurasia is fine with Russia, including most of its neighbours.
You must be thinking of the invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan as not trusting Russia.
Also, it is telling that you recognise that the vast majority of the countries that share planet with said invaders do not trust them. Must have something to do with the constant invasions and other atrocities.
How is loyalty to Trump treason to the genocidal white supremacist state of the US?
You are either claiming that the USSR's liberation of Europe both was and wasn't occupation, or you are claiming that the USSR preventing fascists from coming into power on those countries was 'occupation', while the US putting fascists into power there and also doing things like what has been done to Greece and Ukraine is somehow not such.
Then you are contradicting yourself.
Do you think we support either part of the USian uniparty in general?
If you want to claim that the USSR liberating Europe from the original nazis and stopping the Lebensraum and the Holocaust was "occupation", you have to also concede that those parts of Europe are currently occupied by NATO.
Nobody can trust Russia.
You are implying that somebody can trust the invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Also, most of the world very much does seem to be able to trust Russia just fine.
The elephant in the room are the military expenses to protect against Russia.
Probably shouldn't have been invading Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Iran, and elsewhere, and shouldn't have been pushing for war with Russia all these decades, then.
So, what you are saying is that it is not possible, under capitalism, to provide a solution for the problem that planned economy solves, and that, under capitalism, people will necessarily be tortured by being denied basic necessities like that. If so, I would argue that you are, indeed, correct.
People who say what you say have fundamental misunderstandings about how governments work and about how private companies ("businesses") work.
Ah, I misread what you meant, in that case.