UraniumBlazer

joined 1 year ago
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Dayum, could you please pass me some of what you're having? I bet it's really good.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I don't understand why the knee jerk reaction for everything is just "ban it".

You want to reduce the exposure of children to predators? Moderate the platforms. We can agree that Reddit n Lemmy's moderation is a lot better than Instagram's moderation. Why don't we start with that???

The biggest way predators do their predatoring is by sliding into ur DMs. You could restrict this by requiring approval for all such new DMs by a parent's account or something. There r just so many ways that social media can be made safer for kids.

Social media is a digital townsquare. Sure, there r some malicious actors lurking about. Does that mean that kids should just be banned from this townsquare? No. The townsquare should be made safer for kids. There must be some hand-holding for kids in the beginning so that they can learn how to make the best use of this infrastructure in the future.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Governmental overreach. Good luck trying to enforce this shit.

Social media isn't bad inherently. Addictive algorithms, violation of user privacy, etc. is bad.

Kids should be taught how to make use of social media for good. I was bullied quite a lot as a kid. Social media is what kinda brought me out of it.

Social media told 13 year old me, that it is alright to be gay. Social media is what made me interested in politics. A huge part of who I am today is because of the nice people I met online. Fuck the government for trying to take it away from others like me.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Competition is always good! I don't care who builds them first. I just want them fast lmao.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

So did they smoke him or no?

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

U forgot the great nation of Iran.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

An LLM powered troubleshooting tool would be absolutely op!

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Is this real? If yes, then congrats!!!

If it's what the image says, then I'm sorry...

(Sorry, I'm just confused if you got into college or into a mental institution)

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ok, good luck on your project. We'll talk when any given peertube project (based on the donation based funding model alone) reaches break even.

I swear I've reviewed the finances about this a million times over. Funding models in their current form just don't work. Content creators getting free hosting from YouTube with huge audiences are struggling to keep themselves afloat. But whatever, good luck on your project I suppose. We really need YouTube's monopoly to end, so ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Sure! Remember though, that you are funding this project using your own money. How much does your server cost? How much does the electricity to run your server cost? You would need Gbps speed internet. How much does that cost?

You would be funding this out of your own pocket. Thank you for doing that! Would there be a thousand more people willing to do this? What happens if you lose your job? What happens to the server?

As you can see, this is not a technological issue, but a funding one. If you can generate funding for this somehow, you have a very viable model! IF you can find the funding.

I am saying that funding this would be difficult. I see people just yapping about FOSS, but not funding it when the time comes.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so you just ignore the reports and continue to coast on feels over reals. Cool.

I didn't. I went through your links. Your links however, pointed at a problem with the environment our LLMs are in instead of the LLMs themselves. The code one, where the LLM invents package names is not the LLMs fault. Can you accurately come up with package names just from memory? No. Neither can the LLM. Give the LLM the functionality to look up npm's database. Give it the functionality to read the docs and then look at what it can do. I have done this myself (manually giving it this information), and it has been a beast.

As for the link in the reply, it's a blog post about anecdotal evidence. Come on now... I literally have personal anecdotal evidence to parry this.

But whatever, you're always going to go "AI bad AI bad AI bad" till it takes your job. I really don't understand why AI denialism is so prevalent on lemmy, a leftist platform, where we should be discussing about seizing the new means of production instead of denying its existence.

Regardless, I won't contribute to this thread any further, because I believe I've made my point.

view more: ‹ prev next ›