hcbxzz

joined 1 year ago
[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If you have 100+ apps you're going to need either a ton of organization or a search tool. Some people will meticulously organize their apps into folders, while others go for the search

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

And this is exactly why emojis suck and should never have been invented

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Tracking ads is also a problem, just a different one. The whole point of ads is to manipulate your behavior. There's plenty of reason to not want to make that more effective

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The entire goal is to use money to change your behavior. They're inherently manipulative by definition. It's literally weaponized mass manipulation. There's no way to spin that as a positive effect.

If you think about it in terms of it's effects, advertising is the closest thing we have to mind control: companies are paying money to change the behavior of millions of people. Even without any concrete examples, you can easily see how dystopic it really is when you just think about the intention alone

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

You're talking about Thunderbird, a project they basically abandoned to the community. Thunderbird survives in spite of Mozilla, not because of it. Meanwhile their main product Firefox is still bleeding users down into the single digit percentages while receiving half a billion a year from Google. It takes a lot of skill to run such a company so deep into the ground.

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Firefox actually had tab groups way back, but Mozilla, in their infinite wisdom, removed it because apparently their main mission now is to antagonize all their loyal power users.

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think the car manufacturer is getting that data, but iirc the part of Android Auto that runs on the head unit does collect data when disconnected, then send it to Google when the phone is connected.

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've been using DavMail, which is FOSS. It works as a local proxy to translate IMAP to Exchange API.

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's not going to get you Thunderbolt, mate

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pull up resistors have solved the same problem much more simply for decades. Even with ICs, manufacturers can still make weak cables that lie about their capacity then burst into flames. The IC is not what making the cable safe, it's the manufacturer. And if all else fails, the host can still directly measure cable resistance with some help from the client.

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not a big fan of Apple, but the lightning connector is just better, physically. It’s way more durable in practice since it’s just a solid piece. I wish USB-C was designed that way instead of what we actually got.

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

In theory, USB-C should be better, but in practice, the quality control is all over the place.

All of my micro USB cables and ports have lasted just fine. I used one daily with my phone for 10+ years with no issues, and I've only had maybe two cables ever actually fail. Meanwhile, I've already had at least 5 USB-C cables or dongles that have fully failed, and plus the primary USB-C charging port on a laptop just completely die. I wish it was better, but it just isn't.

Also if USB-C was just replacing just micro USB I'd be ok with that. But the problem is they're also replacing USB-A, and Type C is not nearly as durable as Type A since it's so small, it's just physically impossible. I wish they made a larger version of the Type C port. Same shape, same pins, just bigger in every dimension. As large as Type A, for durability.

I'm not a big fan of Apple, but the lightning connector is just better, physically. It's way more durable in practice since it's just a solid piece. I wish USB-C was designed that way instead of what we actually got.

view more: next ›