I sure hope you’re right about fizzling out. I’m not so sure that it will as the cat is out of the bag, so to speak. What I’d really like to see is some good, robust regulation of AI and its applications, and a general recognition by the population that it’s worth taking seriously.
I like some of what I hear from them, I admit, and I vaguely favour the idea of greens and TOP in coalition with labour. I’d like to know their stance on unionism and labour rights.
That is interesting. Perhaps it has to do with Nvidia’s acquisition of ~~OpenAI~~ (edit: oops) Hugging Face. Nvidia might not want to annoy a customer.
If you have evidence to back up your suspicion, I suggest notifying the many reputable newspapers reporting the news and, as I now see, government legislators devoting their time to assessing the issue. They’d probably love to know that it’s bogus.
What I now think is plausible is something like a powerful AI being asked to solve global warming (let’s say), and deciding that massive reduction of the human population is the best way to achieve that, and then using its hacking tools to enact its own logic. Did I think that was possible before the Hugging Face attack? Nope, but I do now.
At some point the ‘build it and they will come’ model runs into a wall of reality, because people don’t do things just because you really hope they will, but because it makes sense for them.
Take digital cameras as an example. They enjoyed a massive boom about 20 years ago as the technology developed. Then the technology became good enough, and phones became more convenient, and now cameras are returning to being a relatively niche and expensive product. Funnily enough, phones are running into the same problem, which is that they are good enough, and people are more reluctant to run out and buy the latest product now.
All of which is to say, I think AI will eventually settle into a market niche, offering useful tools for data analysis, multimedia editing, and coding, to say nothing of other fields I haven’t thought of. I also think that market niche will not be sufficient to sustain the enormous resources being dedicated to the AI industry at present, simply because they’re wildly overestimating AI’s appeal to the public.
Embarrassing for BMW.
The gold standard would be to make each student do an oral defense of their work. Hand-written exams are good too. Both of these approaches are time-consuming to mark, though.
Assessment design can require students to perform analysis of rare and obscure source material, so that there are no published materials for AI to draw on (which can make it struggle). Similarly, asking for a good bibliography that lists the sources used in the text and formats it correctly would show up the hallucinatory tendencies of AI, I think — though I haven’t tried the latest models.
I can’t be the only one who actively tries to reduce the number of subscriptions I have. It’s terrible for the monthly budget. Gamepass lasted only a few months for me before I decided that I didn’t get sufficient value out of it. Something about paying monthly to retain access to a game that I can otherwise buy rubbed me the wrong way.
I haven’t posted on Reddit since they killed third-party apps. Funny thing is, I was a paid subscriber for years before they did that.
Here to be the change I want to see in the world. Go Lemmy.
My son was in NICU. I thought of his time in hospital as soon as the news about the Palestinian hospital broke. This is terrible.
ooo_shiny
0 post score0 comment score
I’m interested to know by what mechanisms you think that AI could manipulate markets. Not my area of expertise.
And yes — I generally agree with the thrust of your post about the concentration of wealth and wonder what the billionaires’ end game is. History teaches us that desperate people revolt, and revolutions are not pretty.