Hard disagree... I think this is exactly how the government wants you to think.
A really weird thing about civil rights litigation is that is usually involves the absolute worst people you know, like say 4chan or the KKK because the government specifically targets people who are rightfully hated when building their case to eventually limit civil rights for all of us.
Now where have we learned about this from history... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_They_Came
Imagine not developing a controversial emulator anonymously...
there are plenty, you just don't happen to use them
you can't because it's explicitly against the whole point of having endless choices. when everyone works on something different, the quality spreads out to where it's mostly just mediocre stuff across the board.
hardware compatibility is also a huge problem. for everyone that says "it works fine for me" there are a thousand others for whom it does not.
She has her hand in too many strategic places, unlike Telegram.
employed at Google for 13 years
speaker at the 2018 World Summit
written for the American Civil Liberties Union
advised the White House, the FCC, the FTC, the City of New York, the European Parliament, and many other governments and civil society organizations
I'm very disappointed there was no praise for dad at the end of all that.
there is no way to verify they don't actually log anything
I can't believe stock wine is still so bad with so many games. GTA5 is still unplayable with a keyboard, it just freezes for 5 seconds with every single keypress.
When you say "app" do you mean something that will let you view remotely through a residential NAT connection with no port forwarding or hole punching? Because 99.9% of those options are inherently not private.
If you only need the camera itself to have a local feed i.e. you already have some kind of VPN/tunnel/etc. into your home network, then something like a cheap Amcrest works fine and does not require Internet access for the camera itself.
several times I have searched for a problem and found my own stackoverflow question with no replies.
Only if your OPSEC was already bad... LLMs aren't magical, they're just piecing together information you already gave away freely.
Also the authors of this paper refuse to show their work "for safety."