this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
211 points (88.6% liked)

Technology

59774 readers
3092 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 106 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

Younger generations are using other platforms to gather information.

What's not being talked about here is that young people don't seem to give a damn if the information they research is accurate or not, it's whether or not it's peddled by their preferred streamer. Those "other platforms" are apparently Tiktok and Netflix, not exactly places known for speaking truth to power.

I've spent twenty years trying to believe that the children will be the saviors of the future, but I think maybe the conservatives actually succeeded in murdering education in it's crib. I am now nearly fully on team "You know, maybe these kids actually are a bunch of dumb fucks who won't save us after all."

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It’s not so much that they don’t give a damn, but that they can’t tell. I taught some basic English courses with a research component (most students in their first college semester), and I’d drag them to the library each semester for a boring day on how to generate topics, how to discern scholarly sources, then use databases like EBSCO or JSTOR to find articles to support arguments in the essays they’d be writing for the next couple years. Inevitably, I’d get back papers with so-and-so’s blog cited, PraegerU, Wikipedia, or Google’s own search results. Here’s where a lot of the problem lies: discerning sources, and knowing how to use syntax in searches, which is itself becoming irrelevant on Google etc. but NOT academic databases. So why take the time to give the “and” and “or” and “after: 1980” and “type: peer-reviewed” when you can just write a natural-language question into a search engine and get an answer right away that seems legit in the snippet? I’d argue the tech is the problem because it encourages a certain type of inquiry and quick answers that are plausible, but more often than not, lacking in any credibility.

[–] Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

Is it the tech? Or is it media literacy?

I've messed around with AI on a lark, but would never dream of using it on anything important. I feel like it's pretty common knowledge that AI will just make shit up if it wants to, so even when I'm just playing around with it I take everything it says with a heavy grain of salt.

I think ease of use is definitely a component of it, but in reading your message I can't help but wonder if the problem instead lies in critical engagement. Can they read something and actively discern whether the source is to be trusted? Or are they simply reading what is put in front of them then turning around to you and saying "well, this is what the magic box says. I don't know what to tell you.".

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

No, they also dont give a shit.

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think my kid is gonna be just fine. He rarely believes anything i tell em without follow up evidence....He's 5.

But Ive always focused on critical thinking skills from as early as possible.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You must understand that you are part of an infinitesimal minority.

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago

It makes me sad as I observe the wider population 😭

[–] Fizz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Youre gonna have to write fully cited and sourced academic papers to convince him to clean his room.

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Heh, it's been a struggle of complying with authority on simple/mundane task. But slowly its getting away from it

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

"I've heard of RFK Jr. and he says vaccines are bad. He's more famous than scientists, so I believe him for exposing their corruption. "

I can't wait for humanity to go extinct.

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee 25 points 4 days ago

This isn't a young person problem and it isn't new, it's just getting worse. See Fox news on Trump 8 years ago or more through now

[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is the big problem. Kids are trusting search results from a Chinese propaganda platform, and they don't give a shit.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Its the older folks who muddled the walls between editorial and factual reporting, and now thats come home to roost. There are no facts anymore, and very little real journalism anymore. Theres no truth, justice, democracy, or human dignity either. Its not tiktok or youtube who led us where we are, its the double-be-damned boomers and centrists.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This implies TikTok would have some incentive to propagandize their users that Google wouldn’t also have. Google does corporate American propaganda, which many Americans have been acclimated to and thus don’t perceive as propaganda.

[–] Fizz -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You could argue a state has a right to propagandize its own citizens to counter foreign adversarial influence. I'm not saying it does but a state should have its populations best interests in mind compared to a foreign adversary.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

States don’t have rights, people have rights.

at least it's not American propaganda

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I can see your point when talking about broader topics that people tend to absorb over time (politics, social dilemmas, economical condition) but this is more about users intentionally searching narrower topics. What's wrong with my code, how do I fix my car, what computer should I buy, what's the best way to get rid of termites - those kinds of things.

I unashamedly call myself an expert about exactly one car. I learned everything from it's most popular forum from 2010-2015. I admin a Facebook group for it. When I started just on the dedicated forum, we'd get basic questions all the time about super common issues but a few links to good threads and recommendations about using Google with site:thisforum added helped avoid "repeat customers" in the future. That's gone. The forum is forgotten because original owners have sold and new owners don't know about it. No one wants to make an account on a site for just one topic these days when Facebook and reddit are so easy to use. Shitty answer sites following in the footsteps of Yahoo Answers (such as quora, fixya, and justanswer) have dominated normal Google searches. Google often suggests appending "reddit" to searches which is an improvement over those sites, but still atrocious for unpopular niche topics such as my forgotten car, in comparison to the forum. Having an existing account on reddit or Facebook promotes joining a relevant group/sub, not even knowing how to vet them for accuracy, and just blind-firing questions into the void. Google can sparse reddit, but the internal reddit search is rough. Facebook is locked down and the search is even worse. As I've joined other groups for cars I know less about, I can't beleive the abysmal quality of answers I've gotten myself. People act as if I personally sent them a letter requesting information and I get answers that are overly generic, downright useless as they say they don't know, or tell me to try something I said in my main post I already tried. This is the state of the world. None of these platforms value solutions, they value interaction for the sake of user volume. Wanna know why FB Marketplace is continually awful to sift through? Because every minute spent groaning about irrelevant listings and ignoring search parameters is another minute not given to Craigslist, kajiji, or any other classifieds. They don't need you to win, they need the competition to lose.

I don't want to hear anyone's bullshit about ditching reddit and meta. We're a microscopic niche of the internet, here on the fediverse. Our little bubble is not swaying half the fucking planet off meta. Do not act smug and say just go back to the original forums when they're dead/devoid/deactivated because a handful of corporations socially engineered the ideal content streaming platforms.

Blaming kids for being dumb is a cop out. You have niche knowledge from your era about vetting content and avoiding scams/misinformation. You're saying new kids are dumb in those regards. I bet you think older people are dumb in those regards too. Please realize both of those groups have their own niches and think you're dumb, too, in some other topic. You are the peak of a decade, not a century. I don't know your age, you don't know mine, but consider this quote:

“Our youth now love luxury, they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders, and they love to chatter instead of exercise. Children are now tyrants not servants of their household. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up their food and tyrannize their teachers.”

Sound accurate? Look up who said it.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

There's a big difference between "all kids are terrible today" and "some people have very successfully dismantled the education system, and it's impacting our youth to a point where we can't trust their levels of education can protect them against capitalism run amok."

To be clearer: failure to educate is squarely on adults not on children.

where we can’t trust their levels of education can protect them against capitalism run amok

I've been dealing with more zoomer-and-younger kids and uh, it's less that we can't trust that their education level will protect them from the evils of capitalism, but more that we can't even trust that their levels of education are sufficient for them to be able to both read and write, nevermind more complicated things like determining the accuracy of factual data and be able to make a reasonable decision based on you know, critical thinking and analysis.

It's shockingly dire in a lot of places, and it's unlikely to improve, at least in the US, since nobody values education and nobody wants to fund education, and we just elected a pile of geriatric rich white people that think we don't need to do anything but add more Jesus.

And yeah, as adults we've absolutely failed the two most recent generations, and are going to epically, epically fuck up the next one too.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

That's not what I see in your parent comment. "young people don't seem to give a damn" and "I'm nearly fully on team 'young people are dumb fucks and won't save us after all'"

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 7 points 4 days ago

Kids are as smart as we used to be. And we didn't save the then-future, now-present. Same deal with boomers.

Names will change, corporations will change, investors will stay the same. For us things won't get meaningfully better or worse than they are.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago

People of all ages have great people and awful people in them. Always has been so and always will be.