this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
39 points (89.8% liked)
FediLore + Fedidrama
2362 readers
3 users here now
Rules
- Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
- When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse
Partners:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So there's a couple things. Inevitably hosting a video site is expensive as hell, not to mention getting brands to use something requires more than just users. For the former, recurring donations can take the pain away and is in the spirit of the Fediverse as we know it. But with advertising, you have a guarantee and as things develop, brands will go crazy to target their desired demographics. Which is something that the Fediverse isn't really on board with from a fundamental point of view. All in all, it's easy to say it was only a joke. That would be far more believable if not for the vindictive actions that followed. It's not the first questionable thing Dansup has done and it won't be the last. In this case I think he could've just posed the question and had an open discussion about it.
I'm glad that the community is supporting Hazycora for taking a moral stand.
Can you explain more about what are these questionable things?
I'd prefer not to as I don't want to smear the man. He does some fantastic things with the majority of his time.
You already did smear the man. That's why I'm asking about the details, because I suspect that you have none and are smearing him unfairly.
What in the weirdo behaviour is this?
'He's skeezy but I won't go into details.'
Do.
'No man you're being weird.'
Sounds like I got my answer. Usually, if someone makes vague insinuations against someone, it's fair to ask for details. Making snide remarks to smear someone, but then refusing to elaborate with details that could be verified, is weird.
If someone said that I'd done something questionable, I really hope someone like you doesn't pipe up to try and make a mountain out of a molehill.
Sounds more like you are delusional and making things up.
What, you mean when I said, "It’s not the first questionable thing DeadPand has done and it won’t be the last," and then got quiet when asked what I'm even talking about?