this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
8 points (83.3% liked)

NZ Politics

563 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A very long and very qualified list of people who think this is a bad idea.

Also, the infamous Jaffa cake lawsuit.

Just one example of working out edge cases costing a fortune.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rangelus 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet many countries remove VAT from produce without any issues at all. I wonder why it is such a catastrophe here.

[–] Ilovethebomb 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do they though? Are there any countries who do this, and haven't had court cases over weird edge cases?

[–] Rangelus 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well a quick search turns up nothing, but I think a better source his this 2019 review from AU Law Review which found the benefits of zero-rating produce outweigh any potential problems. It even mentions that is is successfully done in many other countries.

[–] Ilovethebomb -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a big step back from "no issues at all", isn't it?

[–] BalpeenHammer 3 points 1 year ago

Did they have court cases and if so did the court cases somehow harm the economy or the population in some way? I find it odd that you would oppose any law because somebody might file a court case. That seems batshit crazy to me. Virtually every law is eventually tested in the courts.

What a bizarre statement.

[–] Rangelus 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I stand by my statement. To the best of my knowledge this exists in many countries without problems.

Of course there have been issues in some countries, but notice I did not say all countries did I?

Further, I see you completely ignored the article and instead chose to pick on semantics.

[–] Ilovethebomb -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To the best of my knowledge this exists in many countries without problems.

Which countries, then? Where has this been implemented where it hasn't cost them an absolute fortune in legal fees and added admin costs?

Or are you just making shit up?

[–] Rangelus 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Canada.

Since you only provides a single example I only need to do the same. Or are you making shit up?

[–] Ilovethebomb -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Rangelus 3 points 1 year ago

None of those have anything to do with food exemptions. We have been specifically talking about zero-rating produce. No-one is arguing that we should start zero-rating other things, or that certain jurisdictions have complex tax code.

You, and others, are trying to argue that GST exempt produce will be frought with troubles, but the only example you have provided is that one court case in the UK.

[–] eagleeyedtiger 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think there is anyone who has compiled a list of specifically those that have removed it from produce, however if you look at this table on Wikipedia: List of countries by tax rate, you'll see that many of them have variable or reduced rates in the "VAT or GST or Sales Tax" column. You'd have to look into each country to see what their reduced rate applies to.

So quite a few countries have managed to make it work it would seem