this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
83 points (98.8% liked)
FediNSFW
1835 readers
1 users here now
Announcements and updates from the Admins
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's some fucked up shit right there.
Like, I don't kink shame, but there's a line. That line is where consent occurs, period. Someone that's drugged can't consent, and of equal importance, can't withdraw consent. So there's really no good way to explore that kink except by role play alone. Even that, you damn well don't do it without a shit ton of check ins.
But those shitstains? Like it or not, a partnership comes with a default assumption that you have each other's backs. You don't betray that, ever. Rape is bad enough. Drugging and raping your partner is stacking horror on horror in a way that makes me question my belief that the death penalty shouldn't exist. Some things are just so vile that anyone doing them can not be trusted to be anything other than vile in all ways.
Don't know if you're interested in my perspective but here it is anyway. Some people shouldn't ever be allowed to live in society again (Bundy, GSK, BTK) and the death penalty can be the most efficient and effective method of ensuring the they never do. In an ideal world where there is perfect justice the death penalty can be justified. We don't live in an ideal world. In practice governments execute a lot of innocent people. Governments also allow the death penalty to creep (if you can execute serial killers and mass murders then why not someone who's only killed one person, then why not people who tried but failed to kill someone, then chronic violent offenders, then chronic non violent offenders...) Governments don't apply the death penalty evenly or fairly, in particular race and socioeconomic status play a significant role in sentencing decisions. Governments view it as punishment which allows them to justify inhumane execution methods to themselves.
So, in my view, the death penalty can be morally justified but should never exist because governments can't be trusted with it.
I'm right with you.
My objection is the same. It isn't so much that it's never the right answer, it's making sure it only gets applied in those cases, and making sure there's no way possible that the verdict could have been wrong in the first plans
Of course, the reason most governments can't be trusted with handling rapists is because they are Capitalist governments, who are of course run by rapists, and then war-profiteers, slave-owners, fascists, and their ilk. In my opinion, tho there is harm reduction to be done as well, the solution is to take after Lenin and Mao and make an organization similar to theirs.
-- Michael Parenti, Blackshirts And Reds, 1995
Actually, considering this quote, a lot is starting to add up with seemingly random countries. Poland was indeed the countries mentioned in Parenti's book that, as he reported, had skyrocketing CSAM trading as well as sex crimes in general. Then, the first country mentioned in the article was a man from Poland.
The one solace I find in this world is that I can piece things together well.
Can't agree enough with you on that one!
Rapists absolutely deserve to be killed. In a revolution this would be done for certain. Unfortunately, governments run by Capitalists will not enforce this rule; even if they list out in a legal code that someone who sexually assaults a woman should be punished with death, rich financiers will find ways to fool people, or evade laws, or get light sentences.
-- Alexander Kollontai, Prostitution and ways of fighting it, 1921