this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
83 points (98.8% liked)

FediNSFW

1839 readers
3 users here now

Announcements and updates from the Admins

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

There's been a lot of misinformation around this article, but to clarify obviously the whole site is not rape content, but it exists on the site. The moderation team has no way of know what is and is not consensusal when it is posted on this site because they allow just about anything to be posted there.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naughtyalt@fedinsfw.app 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

makes me question my belief that the death penalty shouldn’t exist

Don't know if you're interested in my perspective but here it is anyway. Some people shouldn't ever be allowed to live in society again (Bundy, GSK, BTK) and the death penalty can be the most efficient and effective method of ensuring the they never do. In an ideal world where there is perfect justice the death penalty can be justified. We don't live in an ideal world. In practice governments execute a lot of innocent people. Governments also allow the death penalty to creep (if you can execute serial killers and mass murders then why not someone who's only killed one person, then why not people who tried but failed to kill someone, then chronic violent offenders, then chronic non violent offenders...) Governments don't apply the death penalty evenly or fairly, in particular race and socioeconomic status play a significant role in sentencing decisions. Governments view it as punishment which allows them to justify inhumane execution methods to themselves.

So, in my view, the death penalty can be morally justified but should never exist because governments can't be trusted with it.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

I'm right with you.

My objection is the same. It isn't so much that it's never the right answer, it's making sure it only gets applied in those cases, and making sure there's no way possible that the verdict could have been wrong in the first plans

[–] HornyCascadian@fedinsfw.app 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course, the reason most governments can't be trusted with handling rapists is because they are Capitalist governments, who are of course run by rapists, and then war-profiteers, slave-owners, fascists, and their ilk. In my opinion, tho there is harm reduction to be done as well, the solution is to take after Lenin and Mao and make an organization similar to theirs.

Instances of sexual harassment and violence against women have increased sharply. In Russia, the num­ber of women murdered annually--primarily by husbands and boyfriends--skyrocketed from 5,300 to 15,000 in the first three years of the free-market paradise [used sarcastically]. In 1994, an additional 57,000 women were seriously injured in such assaults. These official figures under­state the level of violence. The Communist party committees that used to intervene in cases of domestic abuse no longer exist.

Women also are being recruited in unprecedented numbers for the booming sex industry that caters to foreign and domestic busi­nessmen. Unable to find employment in the professions for which they originally were trained, many highly educated Russian and Eastern European women go abroad to work as prostitutes.

-- Michael Parenti, Blackshirts And Reds, 1995

[–] HornyCascadian@fedinsfw.app 1 points 2 weeks ago

Actually, considering this quote, a lot is starting to add up with seemingly random countries. Poland was indeed the countries mentioned in Parenti's book that, as he reported, had skyrocketing CSAM trading as well as sex crimes in general. Then, the first country mentioned in the article was a man from Poland.

The one solace I find in this world is that I can piece things together well.