381
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 55 points 3 weeks ago

Let's just fucken split already and let them have their backwater country. Its not even worth it anymore. You cannot help these people. There is no cognitive function left to save.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly a civil war would be much more plausible if it was geographically based. However majority of the skew is urban vs rural which makes it a lot messier and less likely.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

So a post-apocalyptic fantasy rural frontier/urban civilization center split is fully within the realm of.possibility.

With US cities and states beibg pretty autonomous most things considered (for now at leas), it could easily happen without the US splitting as far as the world map goes.

[-] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

In reality it's gonna look like random mass shootings.

[-] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago

They're a threat together and a greater threat apart.

[-] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

How so?

Wouldn't red states economies collapse if they were no longer subsidized/financed by the federal government and blue states?

[-] Sibilantjoe@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

And then, what? They sit there and quietly starve to death?

[-] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 14 points 3 weeks ago

They would naturally come to terms with the practical limitations of their ideology and change accordingly. Or scapegoat their neighbors and go on a murderous rampage.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Wouldn't red states economies collapse

Yes, and they'd presumably lash out against the "blue haired woke liberals" in neighboring states. They'd be a raid-based society by the end of year one.

They would become violent almost immediately

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

They’ll always be good for cheap labor and no regulations. Think how we spent the last half century outsourcing everything to China or India, it’ll be even better outsourcing to a third world hellhole close to home

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Individual US states cant leave peacefully, or the US west coast would have long ago. Our federal laws wont allow it-- its basically declaring war. Except for texas, they made a deal when they joined that they can leave when they want to.
If Canada/Britain or Mexico would agree to take the defecting states on they'd stand a snowballs chance, but otherwise not so much.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 2 points 3 weeks ago

Its all good, kinda feels like collapse is coming anyway. Can't leave what doesn't exist anymore.

[-] newton@feddit.online 1 points 3 weeks ago

Too Mutch inbreed !

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
381 points (99.7% liked)

politics

30941 readers
3790 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS