Wild Feed
A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.
-
Be cool to each other. Instance rules apply.
-
All posts should link to a *current, *good quality blog, article, editorial, listicle, research paper, or something that can be considered "journalism."
-
Post title should be the article headline.
-
No misinformation or bigotry.
-
For paywalled media, please provide an archived link in the text body of the post.
-
Commenters who don't read the posted article may receive temporary bans. This is a community for informed discussion.
Tag if needed:
[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.
[D/M/Y] — If the publication is older than a month. You can just tag the year if the article is more than a year old.
[Month and/or year] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.
[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.
[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.
[Archive link in post] — For paywalls and account sign-ins, link the main article in the URL, paste the archive link in the text body.
*Current means the article contains the most up to date publically available information on the subject, within reason. Older publications are welcome as long as they include a date tag.
*Good quality means the source has a good reputation for accurate journalism with a reasonably clean fact checking record.
Check out !Independent_Media@lemmy.today for independent news from around the world or !indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works for Canadian independent publications.
All communities were created with the goal of increasing media literacy and media pluralism.
Sources posted here include:
https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/
apnews.com/
https://www.theguardian.com/international
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/us
Icon image by z0r0z on pixabay, depicting a silhouette of a world map on a paint-splattered background.
Banner image by Lucentius on pixabay, depicting crumpled newpapers.
view the rest of the comments
I mean, they said, "you guys", not "OP", but uh ...
... yeah, I'm all about "dude" and "guys" as gender-neutral, have no idea your pronouns, and don't even remember what the Wild Feed community is supposed to be about just this moment. I'll show myself out. As in, that's the closest I've got to a contribution; I'm not packing my bags like "Surely" promised they are, no matter how much of my life I've spent as an unemployed moocher, and mad about it.
The other users here are well known for our feminism and for pushback from some lemmings because of it.
It shouldn't amuse me as much as it does how they seem to believe they are scoring points by calling out pushback in advance. Looks like a self-own, in my book.
Why are you so afraid to interact with me directly lmfao weirdest users on this site I swear
Yeah I'm getting owned by a bunch of emotional lemmings for sure bro faaak they got me good
Now you're insta downvoting me HAHA fucking emotions off the charts, cry more buddy
Why would I assume you were still here to reply if I did so? Here's me apologizing for taking you at your word, Not.
On a more realistic note, why would I encourage you to discredit yourself further by replying to me replying to you? The fact that you can't understand that would benefit no-one, least-of-all yourself, only confirms I was right to approach things the way I did.
Lastly, I've been a little busy watching Shimoneta, stuffing my face, and washing my laundry over the last 45 minutes to go "insta downvoting". Even your average unemployed dude is apparently too busy with video-games for that level of loser-dom, but since you asked so nicely, I guess I can spare two or three downvotes on my way back to what I was doing.
Hey hold this for me real quick thanks
For the record, mine had been the only up-vote your top-level comment recieved, and mine the only downvotes on Malyca and Velma's replies to it. Ciao!
The only one around here with feelings and not facts is you dude. You cite no sources, and just allow your feelings to create your comments, thereby allowing you to fall into multiple logical fallacies. You're no Spock or Data, no matter what lies you tell yourself.
i cant tell if that guy is defending women, or men.
Maybe because you just announced how much you hate it here?
Nice just replied to the wrong guy here and he insta blocked me XD reply wasn't even meant for him but he took it to heart, sensitive AF I guess
Psh I was being nice to you but oh well.
Have the day you deserve.
Originally dude is gender neutral. A dude is someone that knows nothing about living on a working farm or ranch. Hence the tourist traps called Dude Ranches that were popular in the early to mid 20th century.
Preaching to the choir lol
I made the comment for the young'uns. One of the interesting things I discovered in Debate Club was that people watching the debate are swayed by calm rational arguments, and the crowd will side with the person that makes the most sense to them. In modern times many people have an inherent, though it may be tenuous, sense of logical arguments vs fallacies and deflection. This worked just as well, if not better, when I was accosted by proselytizing Christians on the sidewalk in downtown of multiple cities.
guy/guys is also neutral too.
I originally made it for all the news sources the other major journalism coms kept removing. Now it's just a lax news community.
I mean, "Wild Feed" spells it out nicely in my book, but what's-their-face was just so vehement about "well known bias" or whatever other "obvious" non-sense, the only chill I'm taking for granted is my own lol.
The way they ascribed it to "this site", and pre-emptively denied anyone who might otherwise consider it the option of agreeing with any one of their points, seemed pretty obvious they were just fishing with non-sense to me. Kinda shit I might write if I were the one who secretly hated NEETs.
That was wild. I don't usually get crash-outs over here in the quieter corner of political discourse. I hope they find their way out.