251
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
251 points (97.0% liked)
Privacy
6051 readers
9 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Great, now do that a hundred more times, as quickly as possible... for every book in an entire palette of books. This week.
And then you can't ever sell the books, or give them away, or lend them out, because then your scans are not "backup copies." It's just piracy.
I have been explaining this to people for an entire year, and this stupid fucking story still gets rehashed every week.
And I've also been explaining to people that destroying the book means losing the rights to the contents of said book for an entire year. Yet, here we are
You have been lying to people.
Please explain
If you have a backup - and the original gets destroyed - you still own the backup.
That's what makes it... a backup.
Yes, the backup still exists. What is also true is that you gave your original away or destroyed it intentionally, as it is in this case, so you lose the right to the backup.
Giving it away means there's two copies owned by different people. That's why you have to delete your backups.
Destroying it, accidentally or otherwise, means there's still one copy owned by whoever bought it. That's why you get to keep your backups. What the fuck else do you think a backup is?
A backup is not treated as meaningfully different from the original copy. That's why you're allowed to make one, at all. That's also why you can keep the backup - you still own that copy. Even if you've transferred formats. Which is also explicitly allowed.
A backup is a "break in case of emergency or unforeseen circumstance," a plan-b if you will. The last time I checked, destroying something on purpose is neither accidental nor unforseen.
Legal relevance: nil.
I wasn't aware that I was talking to a lawyer, apologies
Ah, you're the sort who thinks everyone else has an accent.
The fuck do you think you've been yapping about?
If you destroy the book ya don't fucken own it, nimrod.
Yes... you do. That's why it's a backup copy.
If you think copyright law shouldn't work this way, great. We should should really change it to remove any incentive to hoard these scans - obviously these purchases aren't making the authors any more money. But right this second, this is the law, and that's what following it looks like.
Try that argument with a dvd, or a music cd, or pretty much anything and see how fast you get busted for "piracy"
You mean like ripping a CD to MP3s? Which is obviously legal?
Or backing up a DVD to VHS, which is supposed to be explicitly protected, and created a legal argument for DeCSS defeating anti-copying measures?
Why cant they just warehouse the books until the copyright expires, then? Why don't they go slower? Because they don't want to and don't care about the damage.
Don't stick up for them, they aren't gunna pay you for that year you spent trying to hold water for them. Nobody is cuz we don't want that either way.
Yeah why don't they just spend an order of magnitude more effort and money to maintain an unusable forest of dead trees until *checks notes* forever minus a day?
I fucking hate bad arguments, for my own sake. I hate misinformation going round and round, with shrill comparisons to the fucking Nazis, because someone dared to buy and privately preserve a copy of a book that nobody else was likely to ever purchase.
Relax copyright if you want this to go better. The idiots inflating the bubble are doing this because our stupid laws say they kinda have to. It's an asinine legal situation that leads to crap like this, and no amount of well-they-oughtta is gonna change crap like this.