251
Rare Books Shipment Tracked to Amazon AI Facility Where Books Are Allegedly Scanned and Destroyed (www.ibtimes.co.uk)
submitted 6 days ago by A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Amazon is facing fresh scrutiny over the use of physical books for artificial intelligence training after an investigation reportedly tracked a shipment of hard-to-find titles to a company facility in Las Vegas, where workers allegedly cut the bindings from books before scanning their pages and eventually destroying them.

The investigation, reported by 404 Media, involved placing a tracking device inside a book from a large order and following its journey across the United States. The shipment ultimately reached an Amazon facility associated with an operation known as VGT3.

The discovery has raised concerns among booksellers, librarians and readers about what happens to physical books once they are acquired as potential sources of AI training data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Why cant they just warehouse the books until the copyright expires, then? Why don't they go slower? Because they don't want to and don't care about the damage.

Don't stick up for them, they aren't gunna pay you for that year you spent trying to hold water for them. Nobody is cuz we don't want that either way.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah why don't they just spend an order of magnitude more effort and money to maintain an unusable forest of dead trees until *checks notes* forever minus a day?

I fucking hate bad arguments, for my own sake. I hate misinformation going round and round, with shrill comparisons to the fucking Nazis, because someone dared to buy and privately preserve a copy of a book that nobody else was likely to ever purchase.

Relax copyright if you want this to go better. The idiots inflating the bubble are doing this because our stupid laws say they kinda have to. It's an asinine legal situation that leads to crap like this, and no amount of well-they-oughtta is gonna change crap like this.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
251 points (97.0% liked)

Privacy

6051 readers
9 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com