383
EV Charging Doesn't Need to Be as Fast as Gas, Ionna CEO Says
(www.thedrive.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
383 points (95.5% liked)
Technology
88627 readers
3453 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The fact that so many people don't think about this or are unaware shows how well the propaganda worked.
Here is a car that is by far the easiest car you'll ever own, the power to run it is the cheapest you'll ever see, and 99% of your trips will be within one charge/tank meaning you'll never need to worry about range ever - but the propaganda convinced them all that that's a deal breaker.
As an EV owner the road trips we take are the vast minority of driving anymore. When we do there are options.
I can't help but feel if EVs were invented first, convincing people to adopt gas cars would be impossible.
Wait, since when did electric cars stop having brakes?
1 pedal driving doesn't use brake pads to slow down your car. You still have brakes in case of an emergency, but if you're using them enough to wear out your brake pads then you're doing something wrong. As someone else pointed out, you're much more likely to rust off your brake pads rather than wear them out.
The amount of braking force that you can apply with that is relatively small, so if you want to either brake quickly or come to a complete stop, you'll still use the actual brakes. While your brake pads would last longer than typical car, they would still need wear down.
The saddest part is that EVs were invented first, but it was easier to tanker fuel everywhere, rather than building out the electric grid in low-density areas.
Tbf, battery tech was also shit back then.
Many people fail to appreciate just how much consumer battery technology has improved, in their lifetime.
Yes. And another thing people don’t appreciate is that gas always had the inherent advantage in that the oxidizing agent is just sitting around wherever you go. You don’t even need to carry all the chemical agents. If gas cars had to carry around their own oxidizer like rockets do, batteries would have surpassed them long ago.
First, just to be pedantic, EVs did exist first. They go all the way back to the early 1800s. But battery technology didn't advance enough to make them a good option until recently, so your point remains.
I fully agree with you that the only thing keeping gasoline going is inertia. There have been parodies applying the same logic to other fields, like the gas-powered phone.
There's a reason why 80%+ of EV owners say they'll never go back, and a good chunk of the remainder are just waiting on the field to mature a bit.
"those fluid is VERY flammable, it's insane people wanted to sit above one"
"it stink when it's running."
“the wear and tear from containing thousands of internal explosions will inevitably wear parts down over time.”
"leave it running in a closed garage and it will kill you in minutes with poison gas"
EVs still use brake pads. lol
Also electric cars, gas, and steam has a bit of a format war in the 1890’s-1920’s or so, and people really did make a lot of these points back then. Unreliable and sometimes unsafe chargers (basically due to people not understanding electrical engineering as well as we do now) were a big part of why gasoline won out
not really. almost all EV breaking is regen, unless you drive like shit.
EV brake pads can last a lot longer on one pedal cars. Henry Ford's wife drove an EV, she hated his gasoline cars because they were loud, stunk, and could not be started by most women.
Chiming in from experience, our EVs brake pads were rusting faster than they were wearing down. We bought used, so maybe the previous climate was humid, but around 80k miles may have been their first change.
Many (most?) EVs now periodically apply friction brakes to reduce corrosion issues. If an EV doesn't have it, you can do it manually.
Also, that place is disgusting and you have to step over the rotting corpse of 600 soft drinks poured out next to the pump, then touch a handle which is visibly soiled and often sticky, and then you will probably smell like gas for at least the next 20 minutes.
Ha, I never thought of it that way but yes, that tracks perfectly. The "inconveniences" of EVs aren't worse than gas cars, it's just that the gas car inconveniences are considered "normal" right now.
A year later, we still haven’t even gotten a 240V fast charger at home. Still just pluggin’ in to the old wall with a regular old cord. We still manage to get all the charging we need done during the cheap-metered hours, too.
I laugh when I think back to buying the EV. I was so panicked about getting fast charger as soon as possible. I thought the wall plug would get us through the weekend while we tried to find an available electrician, but then we’d get desperate. It just never happened.
After 100k miles in an EV, road trips add about 20 minutes for every every 3 hours of driving. That's all. It's basically a trivial difference which gets statistically lost in the noise of traffic variability. If this causes an issue, it's a lack of prior planning.
Yep, though that depends on destination in some regions. When my partner and I planned our trip to their parents' place, what's normally a 9 hour drive turned into a 13 hour one because we ended up having to charge up to 100% from 5% for one of the intervals due to lack of CCS stations, which was nearly a 60-70 minute charge each way.
That may have changed in the intervening year, and I'd love to have that drive only extended ~1hr instead because we can do ~15% -> 80% charging intervals instead.
I fully agree with you, but you should check out the rest off this thread. I have someone who literally said:
I'm unwilling to plan out two 20 minute stops in my day long road trip that happens maybe once or twice a year in order to have the lowest maintenance lowest fuel cost vehicle I have ever owned. Not to mention the other two options if you seriously cannot do it. People are so carbrained/gas brained I just can't even. I will never go back to owning an ICE vehicle, literally why would you?
I can vouch for this 100%. Have had an electric vehicle for 6 months now.
The vast majority of my charging has been done at home on 120v. Granted, my wife and I both work from home most of the week and have short commutes. Our grocery store has free 240v charging so I top up while I shop.
We took one long trip in those 6 months and rented cars for the drive to/from and used public transit while we were there.
I used a fast charger for the first time this weekend to drop off a kid at the grandparents a couple hours away on Friday and then picked them up in Sunday. Didn't have enough time between trips for the trickle charge to leave me in a comfortable range. 20 minute fast charge did the job for about $15.
It assumes when you want to eat coincides with when you need to charge. It assumes there's something you want to eat within walking distance of the charging station. Also assumes you eat as often as you charge. I almost never find any of those to be true.
okay so a few times a year your meal isn’t exactly when you want to eat. or you can’t eat exactly what you want to eat.
i’ll take that over having to go to a gas station weekly to fill up and pay $50 for the privilege.
Good thing I wrote up two other options if it doesn't work for you. It works perfectly fine on our car trips.
And what will happen to all those gas stations when we are at 90% EVs adoption, as is the goal? Where will you find a gas car to rent? How many gas stations will be left? EVs still need to be much faster at charging if we are going for high adoption
Is your argument both in the same breath that EVs will catch on too quick that all gas stations will disappear in a matter of days and also that EV adoption will not catch on quick enough because charging is too slow?
I want EVs, but they're simply not good enough yet. They need to be much better before they can reach 90% adoption
EVs are perfectly fine, even with current charging speeds. the problem is not fast charging but AC charging coverage. everyone should be able to charge their cars at home or work.
The thing with charging times is mostly anxiety based on fear of the unknown rather than anything tangible
This thread is full of people telling you the opposite. I own an EV and am telling you it's the best car I've ever had and will never go back. If you don't believe they're good enough then you need to analyze why you believe that, because it's simply not true. If you want to ask me questions about what they are actually like, feel free, but I won't sit here and help you "feel" better about them when all the facts show that they're great vehicles to own.
This thread is full of delusional evangelists who are out of touch with what most people actually think about EVs. I owned an EVs for 10 years and the range anxiety is not just some imaginary mental block, it's a real issue that isn't going to be solved anytime soon. I tell you this from first hand experience
it's literally called anxiety, it's a personal issue. We don't call a small tank "tank anxiety". I get a week's worth of commuting out of a single charge. If you owned one for 10 years then you know you can charge at home, and unless you're driving literally the max every day, which right now is about 250 miles every day, then range anxiety is a non issue because you just plug it in when you get home.
If you are worried about road trips, then you need to analyze your personal road trip habits. I already spoke elsewhere in this post about options if you roadtrip, but even frequently I highly doubt it's more than 1% of your total trips.
I'm not willing to compromise on my road trip plans. The car can either handle the trip or not. And right now there doesn't exist an EV that can
So we're just going through the standard ~~propaganda~~ excuses. Since apparently we're hung up on the probably 1% of driving you do (where you go more than 250 miles in a single day), let's refer to what I already said above you:
Your "compromise" feelings are unjustified. Even if you it's just iMpOsSiBLe to drive your EV on a road trip (it's not) you can do other things. Like I said, if you're one of the 80% of North American households who own 2 cars you could take the EV for 99% of your trips, and on the 1% road trips you could... take the other car. If you are like me and only own one car you still have the option to rent a car.
Renting a car is relatively cheap and has the added bonus of not wearing down your car with added miles. Now I lived in the Midwest, I remember family car trips that were long. Driving over multiple states in one day. Those trips were rare, thinking once every few years rare. Maybe once a year. Numbers just make sense, a rental car for that infrequent of a trip is cheaper.
And that's all assuming that again you just cannot take your EV on a road trip. Which is absolutely false. I did a 800 mile roadtrip just earlier this year.
You call them excuses when you are simply unwilling to accept the reason.
No you don’t need it 99% of the time, but in that 1% when you need it, you really need it. 99% simply isn’t enough because that 1% is really important.
Time on a road trip is way more important than time in regular drives. I don’t mind being 30min late getting back home from work, that happens all the time from traffic, but 30min late on a roadtrip means you’re missing daylight, or an appointment, or that restaurant you really wanted to try is closed. These are not imaginary hypotheticals, all of these situations have regularly happened to me even with gas cars.
You say this like this is trivial burden. It is not. The mental load of constantly needing to plan stops around fueling is a significant difference from gas cars in experience and is a significant barrier to adoption. This is a real problem and must be overcome in the future if we are to reach higher EV adoption.
We are not talking about today, we are talking about increasing EV adoption, to say 90-100%. If 80% of households have a gas car, you're not getting there.
Again, we are not talking about today, we are talking about a future where EV adoption is 90-100%. How many gas stations will remain in that future?
This has gone in a full circle now, because this one was your first comment or something. I'm not arguing in circles. I've addressed everything you brought up and now you're just back to your first "argument".
Your worries are over a future that you are predicting from... feelings it seems like. Taking all the worst conjured possibilities and rolling them up, like "there won't be any gas stations" but somehow charging infrastructure and speed also hasn't improved? What is your mind just imagining the lone gas station in the dusty town, closed forever, with a tumbleweed because of shakes fists EVs?
Like I said earlier, I'm dealing in facts right now, I'm not arguing with emotions or a future that you've made up for yourself with no backing.
Freaking, man I don't even know. If planning ahead is a cognitive load on you, we don't have much else to talk about.