437

>Mr Oppen, I'm afraid to inform you that your creation, "Japmelter 3000 Megaladon Ultrakill" has been used in...an unexpected manner.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yakko@feddit.uk 22 points 16 hours ago

Pretty sure different people made the film. What, are they supposed to be proud so it's more fun to hate them?

[-] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 13 hours ago

I think the film would have been much "better" if we showed the horror and devistation that we caused. American media purposefully hides the death and destruction that we do, and paints ourselves as the good guys.

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 13 hours ago

I really agree. For genuinely talking about the senseless horror of those bombings, especially the callous afterthought that was Nagasaki, I prefer Dan Carlin's podcast series.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Grave of the Fireflies should be on every American school's curriculum.

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

On the one hand, yes, it's different people. That said, this particular movie specifically chose to hide the damage to victims and solely focus on the emotions of the man who enabled the tragedy. I'm all for stories of people trying to redeem themselves, but deliberately ignoring the victims was a bad choice, imo.

[-] Enekk@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

One gripe I have with the film is that none of it focuses on the poor, mostly Hispanic, population that lived in New Mexico at the time. These people had their land taken from them (their sole source of generational wealth) and died of horrific cancers post-tests. I think most of history just pretends nobody lived out there.

Here's just one article about it

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 13 hours ago

Really?

...Shit, I guess I need to actually see this film before I talk about it. I assumed it was mere Oscar-bait and just absorbed information about it osmotically. I wasn't even mad at them, just thought oh, they found a guy who looks exactly like David Byrne, of course they wanted him for their Oscar bait film.

Those are not the choices I would have made if I was telling a story about the guy who built the bomb. I would have probably drawn a lot more from sources like Barefoot Gen, myself.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

they found a guy who looks exactly like David Byrne

You may ask yourself
Why the big bomb?

[-] NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago

They're not supposed to melt the civilians.

[-] Tango@piefed.ca 10 points 15 hours ago

Pretty sure Christopher Nolan did not, in fact, melt any civilians.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

He got lazy and used CGI. Directors these days, no sense of what makes a good movie.

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Kubrick would have melted some actors.

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 6 points 14 hours ago

You're conflating the people who did that and the people who made a movie, if you want to throw a "nukes are a war crime" party I'm already on the guest list, but your comment reads like you're talking shit about people who don't like nukes and didn't nuke anybody, are you confused about that?

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
437 points (98.4% liked)

Greentext

8826 readers
740 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS