408
Trump's Voter Raids Have Begun (www.motherjones.com)
submitted 1 day ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 13igtyme@startrek.website 14 points 1 day ago

Aside from Kamala, the others had primaries. Primaries historically have 10% voter turnout. Blame the people that don't vote in primaries then bitch about bad candidates.

[-] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world -1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

It is that easy! It's not like progressives and leftists are sandbagged by the "vote blue no matter who" Dems right?

https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-skewered-republicans-funding-these-maga-losers-1758128

It's not like the Dems sabatoged Bernie, twice, right? Vote in the primaries, it's that easy

They wouldn't sabotage PROGRESSIVES to help REPUBLICANS AND CENTRISTS if you voted in the primaries "The DCCC released opposition research against progressive candidate Laura Moser in Texas and pressured progressive challengers out of races in Colorado, Pennsylvania, and California to support centrist or well-funded establishment candidates." https://inthesetimes.com/features/dccc_left_progressive_challengers_laura_moser_campaign_finance.html

"In Nebraska’s 2nd District, the DCCC lent a hand to Brad Ashford—a former Republican who favors abortion restrictions—at the expense of his more progressive primary challenger Kara Eastman, who supports reproductive rights, Medicare for All and other progressive policies. Over in Virginia’s 2nd, the DCCC swung in early behind businesswoman Elaine Luria, a military veteran who twice voted for her Republican opponent, over Karen Mallard, a union member who supports a $15 minimum wage and universal healthcare."

Same source as above and there way more.

So it seems pretty simple, Dems can tell anyone they want to fuck off (except fellow centrists and Republicans), while the rest of us are automatically MAGA if we don't support "blue no matter who" despite constant opposition and disdain from a party that hates us because they are RIGHT WING

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

Yeah these people are just blind party loyalists who would gladly watch the world burn just so long as they feel like they got a 'win' out of it. That's why they're willing to nonsensically blame everyone except those controlling the levers for how the levers are being controlled.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

It’s not like the Dems sabatoged Bernie, twice, right?

Bernie lost the popular vote in the primaries both times. Voters didn't show up for him.

[-] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Wrong and conveniently ignored everything else.

20,000 emails from seven senior DNC officials, including Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz disagrees with you. The correspondence revealed that party leadership privately favored Hillary Clinton and discussed strategies to undermine Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign, such as questioning his religious faith and dismissing his campaign manager Jeff Weaver as a "liar."

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/democratic-national-committee-apologizes-to-sanders-over-emails-idUSKCN1052BN/

They admitted it was sabotage and formally apologized. The disclaimer that the emails didn't "reflect the views of the DNC" is hard to swallow since it was 20,000 emails from leadership.

the Obama White House and Senate leadership, coordinated to suppress Sanders to prevent him from facing Donald Trump. Allegations include limiting debate appearances, media blackouts, and the strategic withdrawal of rival candidates to consolidate votes behind Joe Biden in 2020. Elizabeth Warren and former DNC Chair Donna Brazile have acknowledged the 2016 primary was "rigged" against Sanders.

https://time.com/4362402/how-president-obama-will-pressure-bernie-sanders/

Examples of the DNC / party establishment opposing progressive candidates in elections:

The DCCC blacklisted any consultant who worked with progressive candidates. Marie Newman lost four consultants within a month.

  1. DSCC / Senate Majority PAC 2020 Primaries Spent $15M+ to help moderate candidates defeat progressive primary challengers.

  2. Nina Turner vs. Shontel Brown (OH-11, 2020) Biden and Clyburn intervened to back corporate-friendly Brown over progressive Turner, with help from a pro-Israel super PAC.

  3. Jessica Cisneros vs. Henry Cuellar (TX-28, 2022) Pelosi, Clyburn, and other House leaders backed Cuellar (under FBI investigation) over progressive challenger Cisneros. AOC called it "an utter failure of leadership."

  4. DCCC Endorses Bains over Villegas (CA-22, 2026) DCCC endorsed centrist Bains over progressive Villegas. The Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC called it "undemocratic."

  5. Michigan Senate Primary (2026) Establishment-backed Haley Stevens vs. progressive Abdul El-Sayed drew $58.6M in super PAC spending, mostly against El-Sayed. AOC personally transferred $1M to help. Pressley called the DSCC's spending "shameful."

  6. Colorado Primary (2026) National Democrats injected $2.4M via super PACs against progressive challenger Kiros to protect incumbent DeGette.

  7. DCCC Spending Disparity (2018) DCCC spent $340K on progressive Rob Quist (MT) vs. millions for centrist John Ossoff (GA). A DCCC-commissioned report discouraged members from campaigning on Medicare for All.

  8. Team Blue PAC (2022) Hakeem Jeffries co-founded an explicitly anti-progressive PAC to protect establishment incumbents.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

They will never understand this simple fact. There either weren't enough Bernie supporters in the first place or far too many stayed home for the primary. And very nearly every Bernie voter in the primary went for Hillary in the general. There wasn't a conspiracy, progressives just don't vote. If they did, we'd have a progressive democratic party.

Delegate voters are who matter, and the "super delegates." Not popular vote and of course you're ignoring the fact they hamstrung his campaign otherwise it doesn't fit your narrative.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

Except he still lost the popular vote too, overwhelmingly, because progressives don't vote in primaries. With no DNC shenanigans he still loses handily, BECAUSE PROGRESSIVES DON'T FUCKING VOTE IN PRIMARIES.

Much like in the general election for President, POPULAR VOTES DON'T MATTER WITH THE DNC. It comes down to getting either a winning amount of the delegates or the "super delegates."

And let's try addressing the elephant in the room now, why would the DNC go to such means to ensure Bernie Sanders doesn't win the nomination?

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

Because "you protest voters refused to vote for him and handed the election to Trump" right? Or does that only apply when you need to absolve the people running the party from responsibility for their actions?

[-] teslekova@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

Pretty big "aside from" there...

[-] 13igtyme@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

1 out of the mentioned 3. Meaning the other person is 66% liar.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
408 points (99.0% liked)

News

39662 readers
2132 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS