this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
56 points (93.8% liked)
NZ Off topic
413 readers
1 users here now
This community is for NZ discussion about random non-NZ things, or whatever you want! Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, something you found funny, anything goes!*
*except for:
- anything against the global instance CoC
- anything too controversial (keep it light-hearted)
If you want to have a serious political discussion, take it to !politics@lemmy.nz.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have heard the USA is not divided amongst states but urban/rural boundries. Even within a state you can leave a city and find yourself in the middle of a religious fundamentalist haven run by the english speaking taliban of the district.
Can confirm; I am in Florida.
It's both. That urban/rural divide has been growing for about 50 years and is currently the main point of conflict, but just under the surface are much older regional divisions. Consider this map based on voting habits and cultural trends.
Where does that map come from? What is the granularity of it? I find it astonishing to believe that not one city in those red regions didn't vote for Biden.
Colin Woodard in his book American Nations. It's divided on a county level, and the colors are averages across all counties in each region. Obviously it's not a perfect representation, but it's one way to map out the subtler differences that exist on a larger scale than cities or states.
It's not only not a perfect representation it's actually deceiving because it hides the urban/rural divide. It's also not measuring the number of people voting, it's looking at acreage which is a useless metric.
It doesn't show the urban/rural split because that's not the focus of the map. There are many layers to American politics, one of them happens to be regional. If you believe that anything other than red v blue or urban v rural, is "deceptive" and irrelevant, then you're either an extremely sheltered American or an uninformed foreigner. As someone who has lived their entire life on the border between two of the highlighted regions, I can assure you they are very real and relevant. The reduction down to an urban/rural dichotomy is the result of fifty years of polarization in the two-party system, which ignores 500 years history.
So why did you post it in response to a post I made about the urban/rural divide?
America is not a unified country. This isn't a new thing, it's been that way for decades. Half of the country hates the other half.
If you look up, you'll see that your original post was in response to mine, where I was talking about regional differences. No offense, but you clearly are not well versed in the history of American politics and the way that history impacts the present, and I would recommend you do a little more research if you're going to pretend otherwise.
I told you that regional differences were not as important or significant as the rural/urban divide and I am right.
Even in those regions the cities voted for democrats.
I would recommend you do get some information outside of whatever bubble you are in before you spew your sanctimonious condescending bullshit.