11
Harry Mowbray calls Coatesville mansion summit to get rid of MMP
(www.rnz.co.nz)
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom ~ Alternate frontends ~ Donate
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
It could get really ridiculous; there is a theoretical maximum of 78 overhand seats. 71 from main electorates and 7 from Maori electorates.
Obviously this is super unlikely; but if Nat/Lab said give all of your party vote so X and just give us electorate vote; some big overhang numbers could eventuate.
Is it super unlikely? Or is it going to start to be the only way to get in if "the other side are doing it"?
Unlikely to hit 60+ overhang; but I could see 20-30 seat overhang becoming "normal" if we don't fix it.
With minister salaries and extras; 30 "extra" MP's is getting dangerously close to $10M/yr
Realistically $10m is nothing in the budget of the country. My concerns are around democracy and the disproportion from people manipulating the system. As someone else mentioned in another post, Germany didn't really solve the issue but disincentivised it by basically cutting off the overhang if the party didn't get enough votes. If the overhangs are going to come from manipulation of the system instead of genuine desire for particular representatives then we should probably do something similar. I'd be ok with some limit like max overhang of 1 per party or something that would allow some flexibility without the purposeful manipulation. That would make the vote splitting strategy a lot riskier compared to the payoff. It might incentivise more smaller parties by TBH that's what I'd like.