this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
1658 readers
19 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
[USA here]
Interesting, $52k sounds like a rounding error. But how bad do the official lodgings suck if he wants to live in an apartment?
From what I understand its a couple of nights a week while he's in Wellington for say cabinet meetings, or a session in the house. Its much more like a hotel you go to regularly than an actual house.
But, its basically a tax free allowance of NZ$52k, I think I saw someone calculate it out as being around NZ$80k that a regular person would need to earn to have that much money after tax.* In terms of the cost to the taxpayer its nothing, the issue is that it was basically a rort, because the actual cost to himself for that mortgage free apartment is nowhere near the $52k - and we have to pay for the upkeep of the Prime Ministerial apartment whether he uses it or not. He was also the first Prime MInister in about 30 years to claim the benefit; and in that time there's been a couple who also owned their own homes in Wellington but didn't claim it.
His claim is that the official lodgings are really bad, but he won't let any media in to take footage of it to see how bad it really is; and just over a year ago Jacinda Ardern lived there when she was in Wellington often with her toddler child - so the assumption is that it can't be that bad. One suggestion I heard was that his private apartment doesn't have to keep a register of guests so he could meet with anyone there. But I think the truth is that he's just a classic rich ex-ceo, book every expense against the company (or now the country) and milk the job for all its worth while you're there.
*This is more than the median wage in New Zealand, so its a pittance for a guy worth millions like Luxon, but a lot of money for a regular Kiwi.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/what-you-need-to-know/511123/big-expensive-and-not-fit-for-purpose-what-you-need-to-know-about-premier-house
Pretty grody, by the sound of it.
To me it sounds dated, like a 70s house or so. It was good enough for the last PM and her kid. I'm sure it's tired and a bit cold, but nothing worse than a lot of renters put up with.
No insulation etc is pretty bad, it's not that hard to fit double glazing. It does seem to me the place is due for a big renovation.
Oh I have no doubt about that. And I've flatted in Dunedin, so I know what those old shitbox houses can be like. I think the point of all this is that it's dated and needs work, but isn't unlivable.
Of Luxon had come out and said "my bad, I didn't really think about it as it's one of the entitlements of the job, but now that it's been brought up you're right I don't need the allowance. Why am I not staying in the Premier House? I just find my own apartment more comfortable is all", I honestly reckon it would have been a 24h story.
Luxon is not a 24hr story kind of guy 😂