this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)
NZ Off topic
412 readers
1 users here now
This community is for NZ discussion about random non-NZ things, or whatever you want! Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, something you found funny, anything goes!*
*except for:
- anything against the global instance CoC
- anything too controversial (keep it light-hearted)
If you want to have a serious political discussion, take it to !politics@lemmy.nz.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think that anything with such narrow operating parameter is always limited. Just the way things work. Take rockets - ones to put humans in orbit are very different than say sounding rockets, or other sub-orbitals, or even ones for satellites (and those vary based on LEO or GeoSynch).
Soviet Union used ground effects planes as naval vessels with missiles (Ekranoplan), which I guess the tradeoffs made sense.
The Soviets also crashed one of their ground effect planes, killing all the crew. I understand they were also very costly to operate.
Electric ground effect has a major advantage vs the jet turbine driven ones.
It does not have to suck in massive volumes of air close to the ground....sea water is not good for jet turbines.
Sea water is a nightmare for anything mechanical, in my experience, but electronics can at least be sealed effectively. Usually.
The biggest reason I'm so sceptical about this, is every other use case I've seen for electric vehicles or vessels has been something that's already a proven concept. Cars, trucks, planes, harbour ferries, they are all a proven concept, we're just moving to a different fuel.
Ground effect planes, on the other hand, have never been proven with any fuel type.
Good point.... We will just have to watch and find out. Ground effect theory, and somewhat practice is sound.