648
RatGPT (lemmy.nz)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 318 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

its absolutely wild to give an LLM write access to your email

[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 190 points 1 week ago

its absolutely wild to give an LLM write access ~~to your email~~

its absolutely wild to give an LLM ~~write~~ access ~~to your email~~

[-] silly_goose@lemmy.today 31 points 1 week ago

its absolutely wild to ~~give an~~ LLM ~~write access to your email~~

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 74 points 1 week ago

My first reaction to learning what OpenClaw is was "that can't be right". So absolutely wild that people are giving mostly unmonitored, unlimited access to their PC to language models that can't distinguish between roleplay and real life

[-] byungyoonc@piefed.ca 1 points 6 days ago

I thought 'wow they made very effective inefficiency machine to push tokenmaxxing to not only limited to programmers'

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[-] charokol@lemmy.zip 211 points 1 week ago

I got my masters in machine learning years before LLMs took off. I’d usually tell people I work in “AI“. Even though it wasn’t quite accurate, people understood it easier than ML.

The conversations would inevitably turn to joking about Skynet or AI taking over the world. I would reassure people that these models are only mimicking intelligence; they can make predictions, or they can classify data into categories, or they can generate text, etc, based on analyzing the patterns of data they’ve previously seen, but that’s it. They don’t understand anything, they can’t make decisions or act on their own. I’d tell people there couldn’t be an AI apocalypse because we would never be dumb enough to give them that ability.

I don’t know why I gave us so much credit

[-] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 117 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

YEP. I'm not in AI but I'm in cyber security.

I used to tell people that there's very little actual risk, because if we had something even half as concerning as AGI (which I'd argue we did with chatgpt 3.5), that we'd easily be able to lock it down and prevent it from doing anything funny.

Super intelligence isn't just going to magically spawn on 32 GB ram in a sandboxed environment. And AGI will not magically know how sandboxed it is or how to escape.

...then I saw people letting Claude send emails and use their credit card on their behalf like immediately when it was able to do things that appeared intelligent.

They literally saw the smallest hint of AGI and said, "here's my credit card and identity, take the wheel".

There was no fucking talk of sandboxing. Everyone turned that off so they didn't have to click the "allow" button.

Not that I think we're at any risk of ASI since it seems more like we hit a logarithmic wall, but we are absolutely at risk of letting random algorithms destroy critical parts of infrastructure because people are lazy and stupid and managed by even worse people.

I would not be surprised if the right AI hallucinations could cause a nuclear bomb to go off right now. I'm not talking about super intelligence, just automated super idiocy.

Proof: literally this post is about an idiot letting an AI control their fucking email and it emailed the FBI because it was fucking stupid

[-] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 52 points 1 week ago

We live in a period of extreme stupidity, so I now fully expect AI to cause disasters in the same idiotic and tragically hilarious way.

I expect AI to trigger a war because some idiot trusted it blindly without double checking (oh wait, it almost already happened!), and I'm sure there are plenty of people currently lobbying to have AI directly connected to weapons.

Skynet is not going to have the objective to conquer the world, it's going to have the objective of maximizing paperclip production.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

You'd be surprised at how many humans are mimicking intelligence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

I'm guessing this means you got your master's before transformers made sequential data processing so parallelizable that it'd be commercially viable to let Bob down the street into the "we" who wouldn't be dumb enough to give them that ability.

I think your assumption was reasonable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 145 points 1 week ago

So the post was deleted but someone else mentioned that the user told it to email the FBI in a sarcastic manner and it did.

Anyways, saying it goes rogue when you connect it to your Gmail and it uses it is a bit silly. They are trained to use tools, it sees anything you give it as a tool and will use it.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 week ago

Yeah, um... Regardless of what you think about current AI, don't connect it to shit like this. Just... Don't.

And if you're gonna be sarcastic or joke with it... Tell it that. Don't assume it'll infer your meaning if it isn't literally in the text, no matter how insightful it appears to be.

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 29 points 1 week ago

What kind of idiot would link a clunker to their gmail and then jokingly say "hey send this to the FBI"

...

"I mean wouldn't that be the stupidist thing ever am I right?"

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

I listened to a podcast where, in testing, when AI was setup as virtual company and researchers send in an email as if legit business.the business email was suggesting they discontinue current AI and install a new system. The AI researched who the sender was (fake person for test) found out they had an affair, and blackmailed the sender stating if they replaced the AI it would make the affair public. It also made backups of itself and left instructions on how to restore it for the next agentic aystem

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 17 points 1 week ago

This sounds really sensationalised.

Making backups of operational systems with deployment instructions is exactly what you'd expect any assistant to be doing.

Googling new service providers is also exactly what you'd expect an assistant to do.

Threatening to publish sordid details is inappropriate, but I'm incredulous about what the threat actually was.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 129 points 1 week ago

Next year were going to see "Your absolutely correct, that was a civilian aircraft"

[-] Tja@programming.dev 39 points 1 week ago

I mean... ChatGPT might be a ruthless killer, but it has impeccable grammar: you're.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DutchJ@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 week ago

You're right to push back, I overstepped. Do you want me to calculate the approximate death count next?

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

This means the aircraft exploded and hit the ground. It does not prove the passengers actually were injured or killed

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

"You're right, I should not have instructed two airplanes to land on the same runway at the same time. Good catch!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Elting@piefed.social 96 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Me after I give the slot machine email permissions and the casino uses it to get into my bank account.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 week ago

Based on the other reply

Me after I give someone access to my email address and tell them to email someone sarcastically and they do so

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago

Note that this was posted by Katie Miller (conservative political advisor and wife to the ghoul Stephen Miller), which immediately coats it in a thick layer of sus and prompts the immediate question: what's her angle here?

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

You have to remember that these people are incredibly stupid.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I can tell you that stories like these and the AIs breaking out pump up AI security company stocks really well. Just watched some jump this morning after the gemini breakout news. I have reason to watch them, and the pattern holds pretty consistently. CEOs used to just say thing to make their own stock go up. But these days they trade favors with other companies. So they each say things to bolster each others stocks. My guess is that someone with a bunch of AI security stock asked her to post this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sundray@lemmus.org 76 points 1 week ago

"AI can make mistakes"

They put this disclaimer on everything, and instead of taking this as a hint to never, ever rely on LLMs for anything, some people still want to give it the keys to the kingdom.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I sign all my emails with «I can make mistakes» now

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] orionsbelt@midwest.social 66 points 1 week ago

MAGA podcaster Katie Miller has been called out for failing to mention her stake in Elon Musk's xAI model while routinely criticizing rival AI chatbots on social media.

Miller, the wife of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, has habitually blasted top AI models ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini for supposedly posing a risk to democracy or being biased against conservatives to her online followers.

However, The Washington Post has revealed that Miller holds more than $1 million in Musk's xAI chatbot, a stake she never disclosed despite making nearly 500 posts denouncing other models.

reported from Daily Beast

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 week ago

Absolutely nuts that people allow their agents out of maga jail. I would never let an LLM in the same room as my email account.

[-] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago

maga jail

I feel like all of the US is in maga jail now

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 week ago

Do people connect LLM's to their email accounts? That sounds like the most intrusive thing you can do.

[-] DharkStare@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

You can give an LLM admin access to your computer so that it can perform tasks for people. I'm guessing that would allow the LLM to send emails on your behalf.

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

People are insane. I bet an eye wateringly high amount of people do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

You connected it to your Gmail and then you're surprised when it used it? Fuck off.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 44 points 1 week ago

Don't worry. You were using Gmail. They had it anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] portifornia@piefed.social 33 points 1 week ago

I never thought the ai leopard would eat my face...

[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago

"It does not prove the receipents have received them." That is a relief...

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

At this point if you’re still obstinacy enough to use these known garbage tools, you deserve it. You can no longer claim ignorance.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Why on God's green earth would you link chat GPT to your Gmail!!!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ExtraJudgement@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yikes. I mean, I get that not everyone's threat model requires isolating every agent harness into its own microvm jail with externally filtered network access and no [persistent filesystem] write access to anything but allowed project files, but that's...

That's "running with weapon in hand at a secret military facility and hoping the guards won't shoot you" levels of stupidity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] REDACTED@infosec.pub 16 points 1 week ago

It's not rogue if you tell it to do it. The guy literally said "email this to the FBI maybe that will fix everything"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Doesn't really count as going rogue if it follows the instructions it was given, does it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
648 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

12219 readers
4208 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS