this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
31 points (97.0% liked)

NZ Politics

565 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They also want to “invest in carbon capture”. That’s cool but we also need to immediately stop burning fossil fuels. I’m pretty skeptical of carbon capture as a solution to our burning planet.

He also wants to shelve the Lake Onslow pumped-hydro scheme, but wants to end iwi involvement in decision-making because they’re blocking hydro projects. Maybe take a look in the mirror Seymour, you’ll find a hydro-blocker looking back at you.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] luthis 8 points 1 year ago

Carbon capture is a scam.

[–] absGeekNZ 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not much point in carbon capture investment at this stage. None of the techniques actually pull in more carbon than they release.

We are getting closer with better catalysts and potentially meta surfaces, but we are not there yet.

[–] cloventt 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly - if you’re politician that’s cynical about climate change it sounds like a solution without any need to actually change how much carbon you produce. But it isn’t a solution.

[–] absGeekNZ 1 points 1 year ago

Carbon capture will be a solution, it is just not there yet.

The problem is investment, if you decided to throw half of the money at CC that was thrown at the COVID response, so roughly a trillion dollars....CC would get there much faster. The best way to do this would be to tax the externallities of greenhouse gas pollution.

There doesn't seem to be any energy paradox with CC. Much like 400+% efficiency is possible with a heat pump by simply moving heat around rather than trying to create it directly, CC will have a ah-ha moment and we will get much higher kg of carbon / kWh than now.

My money would not be on a chemical process (better catalyst) but on a novel meta-surface that preferentially binds to CO2 in a reversible manner. e.g. the surface would be exposed to low concentration CO2 (air or sea water) and "charge up" with CO2 over a few hours, an electrical current would then release highly concentrated CO2 into a carrier fluid (air or water) which could be captured and stored in one of the many ways that have been proposed.
Most of the storage methods that have been proposed have been contingent on getting a concentrated source of CO2.