this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
578 points (98.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32833 readers
1670 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What about joe? Because the engineer who bootstrapped the project mistakenly put his name as the mainline branch and we realized it far too late during the lifecycle and the team decided to keep the branch name because it's hilarious.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Branch on every commit. Never delete. If something needs to be rolled back, merge it back into HEAD. Conflict resolution only through melee combat.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 46 points 1 year ago

Never merge. Only cherry pick.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 21 points 1 year ago

You have met every team I have ever worked with apparently

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How have you survived in this world without exploding into a million little fiery merge conflicts?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I let the interns handle those. If they survive, they get bragging rights.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Conflict resolution only through melee combat.

Wrestle with Jeff, Prepare for death.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 year ago
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 32 points 1 year ago

It's master3. Don't question it!

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kubica@fedia.io 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like prod because it makes less assumptions on stability. It is what is being used, good luck with the rest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“live” didn’t make it onto the list, I see.

[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Live and let die?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnotherPenguin@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 29 points 1 year ago

Why would you name a branch just 7 asterisks?

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 20 points 1 year ago

Boring answer: older repos are master, newer ones are main. I've worked at companies that did other things such as having the prod branch be a branch called prod.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Chaotic Evil should be the current sha hash.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

🤡 for master

👽 for test

💩 for dev

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Develop should be Chaotic Evil.

[–] roanutil_@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what is used where I work. I have never and will never understand why.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 14 points 1 year ago

belay your panic. even mommy cannot save you.

"testing"

don't wake up. fourth row just dropped.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 1 year ago
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Feel like lawful evil fits better for master

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It's goshujin-sama

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yall have multiple branches?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"fuck it, it''s friday"

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] tamlyn@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago

we use git-flow in our company. So release is already another branch.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Untitled-project2_final_fixed-3.zip

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

(empty string)

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

it's a one way ticket to having "who's on first?" problems

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If you never pu5 anything into production then you never fail

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Moab is “mouth over anus & balls”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pohart@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

qa.

All development happens in feature branches. Someone other than the original developer needs to build and test the feature on our development servers. If successful it gets merged into qa, where it gets built and tested against it qa servers. Production build are tags on qa.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cute_noker@feddit.dk 6 points 1 year ago
[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Some of my repos on github use either main or master.

[–] dosuser123456@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

branch (i always commit directly to the main branch so i only have one, so why bother naming it. also YOU CANT STOP ME FROM DOING IT BWAHAHAHAHAHA)

[–] enbipanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago
[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] RiQuY@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Mithre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Our development branch is "working", then we have specific dated snapshots where we run our datasets through our programs.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Main is QA. Production is release branches.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hey Linus did you merge my branch into mommy? I really want to get it out.

load more comments
view more: next ›