176
That’s wild. You should have no problem releasing the files then. You know to prove your theory.
Getting by on the most technical basis possible, Epstein did traffic girls to his own properties and then invited the other perverts there. So he only trafficked girls to himself in the way that someone throwing a party only buys a 30 rack of beer themselves, not with everyone who will drink out of it there with them at the liquor store
But even then that’s demonstrably false. So many of the women and girls that “worked” as “massage girls” for him ended up married to his rich and powerful friends… His accusers all confirm they were many times “given”, for a limited time or permanently, to other powerful men.
This pathetic sycophantic yes man is literally betting we’ll forget things that were in mainstream media, being talked about by everyone, just a few months ago.
Who narrowed the scope of the investigation?
Alexander Acosta
Do you know that name, he was trump's first secretary of labor back in his first term.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Acosta
Also, for fucks sake, we know they trafficked Guiffre to Prince Andrew
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Giuffre_v._Prince_Andrew
Right, there's a shitload of credible information all over the place that contradicts what he's saying today. Are they that stupid or just assume we all are?
They are confident their propaganda machine still works
Seems pretty defensive. So he did traffic women and girls, but only to himself? That's like claiming the drug dealer is the only one using the drugs.
In particular when they've already announced over 1000 victims.
How the hell did Epstein have time to rape 1000 victims... and still have so much time to party with and manage money for so many powerful people.
Also yeah, the trafficking itself is such a crazy concept. You don't solo traffic so many people by yourself.
Patel is lying. Here's one from Epsteins Birthday book that got released. 
That is a picture of mar-a-logo in the background. The picture comes from Joel Pashcow who put it in the book.
'Pashcow introduced Epstein to Trump in the 1990s when all three moved in the same social circles in both Palm Beach and in New York' according to the Daily Mail
Meanwhile on 9/11, one day after Kirk was killed, Maga Senate Republicans defended Trump by stopping the release of the Epstein Files with a 51-49 vote. What a convenient time for a narrative changing event for the media.
Well if he says it, it must be true. Why do people even bother posting these stories? "Trump says.." "Patel says..." All it does is spread and give credibility to their lies, by posting their lies in the freaking headline.
It is an official lie that shows they are actively and publicly obstructing justice instead of just trying to let it fade away through inaction.
Right, you and I know that, but I worry most people just casually browse the headlines quickly, scanning the news highlights, and don't put much thought into it. The way I worry it plays out is someone reads the headline, puts no thought into it, ends up in a social situation later where the topic comes up with and then person says "wait, wait I thought I just saw they said...[regurgitates headline lies]" and now the lies have spread and have some legitimacy to them in the social circle, muddying the waters of the topic and causing confusion on truth, or if the social circle is in agreement of the headline, then just causing more of an echo chamber
Soooooooo..... did Kash Patel just say that Bill Clinton and Bill Gates are NOT implicated in all this? Like, now NO ONE is involved? The Epstein list is 100% fake?
How can any human being say that with a straight face?
What an incredibly stupid lie. Like Epstein was the Santa Claus of raping children, he somehow managed to get into all those houses all by himself in just one night!
Well if Kash Patel said it, it must be true.
Lies, all lies! Like telling the truth would make them physically sick.
Politicians amirite
Patel told senators the FBI's investigative files on Epstein were limited because a U.S. attorney in Florida improperly narrowed the scope of an investigation into Epstein two decades ago.
And who would that be, Alex Acosta who was given a cabinet position in Trump's last administration?
What reality has Patel arrived at this one from? Does coming from another reality make him an illegal immigrant?
He's here on the same visa that Melania used.
He was told what to say, and he said it, that's how.
Yeah. Just a bunch of 1st hand, eye-witness testimony. But, no one listens to the victims, in any real investigation. That would be rude to the accused. /s
Uh huh. Hey Kash ol' buddy ol' pal, who decides what's credible and what's not? You?
Okay Qanut MAGATs. This is your fuckin’ mess. Well?!
What would a flunky involved in a cover-up say?
Is the meeting with senators public? does anyone have a link?
edit: 4 hour stream by AP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eMs_dDFEIc
(does anyone have tips for youtube frontends for hotlinking nowadays?)
Hey everyone, let's take this fascist enabling deer caught in headlights at his word.
Anyone see a problem with that?
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
176 points (99.4% liked)
News
39243 readers
2910 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS